Vault101 said:
Mansplaining is a portmanteau of the words "man" and "explaining" that describes the act of a man speaking to a woman on the assumption that she knows less than he does about the topic being discussed, even if it is obvious that she knows more. ...
The problem is, is there a necessity for a term to exist for this specific situation? I mean, people talk at others like that all the time, but we don't have a word for every instance of it. If a conservative poster is trying to tell liberals he knows more about the liberal folks then they do, what's he doing, is he "conservasplaining"? If a geek talks to a jock allegedly knowing more about how jocks act than the jock does, is the geek "geeksplaining"?
Besides, what using "mansplaining" unironically often means is "Hey hey, look at me, I took two words and made a new word and now I'm using this new word to dazzle you with my rhetoric skills so you'll fall silent in amazement, aren't I
smart and awesome?"
Or
"I used the word 'mansplaining'! Instant I.W.I.N., suckazzzz!"
Often. Bottom line is, I find it incredibly pretentious.
the OP made a mistake turning this into afeminism thing when it really didnt need to be
It's not the OP who turned this into a feminism thing. She's just pointed out a trend and said "Hey, folks, I think we better nip this one in the bud". And I'm quite in agreement with her and think it was a good idea.
And I'm not only saying that because she looks good wearing that hat. ("Suspiciously Specific Denial" would be the trope for this, but am I playing it straight? Am I?)