If they relabeled this, they'd have to relabel the romance genre.BeerTent said:I think it was advertised incorrectly, because it's about abuse.
...which would be funny.
If they relabeled this, they'd have to relabel the romance genre.BeerTent said:I think it was advertised incorrectly, because it's about abuse.
Equally surprised that Beyonce provided the song for the trailer. I'm pretty sure she doesn't know what the movie is about other than it is popular with women. I'm just going to wait here with a bowl of popcorn to see this blow up in her face.008Zulu said:So a badly written Twilight fan fic has got it's own movie. I am surprised that they would make a movie glorifying the abusive relationship that a man forces on a woman.
I see your Gilbert Gottfried, and I raise you Charles Dance.Anachronism said:I've not read the books, but I'm reliably informed that they're absolutely terrible. The only way this film could be of interest to me is if they go for the NC17 rating, which of course they won't because it's box office poison. It'll never be better than this, anyway.Tentheria said:The only reason anyone read this book was for the turgid and dull sex scenes, that in all likelihood they won't be able to show in their entirety on screen in a major film release.
Meh, I say to go with this review (and the subsequent sequel reviews) instead:Shamanic Rhythm said:Tame and borderline hilarious. I can't put my opinion of it into words, so I'll leave you with this:Ed130 The Vanguard said:I have not read 50 shades, but all this talk of porn has rendered me mildly intrigued. (Not enough to read it, or watch the movie). Is it tame? Kinky? Japanese? Weird? Banned in most civilized countries?
http://thingsboganslike.com/2012/09/14/253-fifty-shades-of-grey/
Not enough.Zombie Badger said:How many do you think were just seeing how bad it could possibly be?
And if you actually talk to any of the people who are fans of the book (ie: ridiculous numbers of women), you'll find that this is not the case. The women I know who were into the book are still very much interested in the movie, either in spite of the reductions to make the R rating, or in ignorance of it.Mcoffey said:I call bullshit. No one thinks this movie is going to be anything but bad twilight fan fiction robbed of the only thing people were interested in in the first place in order to secure the R rating.
Couldn't agree with this more.Vault101 said:its weird...because I actually cannot (for the life of me) figure out how it got so popularEd130 The Vanguard said:I have not read 50 shades, but all this talk of porn has rendered me mildly intrigued. (Not enough to read it, or watch the movie). Is it tame? Kinky? Japanese? Weird? Banned in most civilized countries?
and I don't mean that in a "hurr hurr bad twilight fan fic" way...I'm honestly baffled, if not for how badly its written but also because the erotica genre exist beforehand
It's porn. That's all it is. It's a Twilight story where the pale boring guy ties up the pale boring girl and does naughty things to her. It's utterly generic if you've ever read any erotica online or otherwise.Ed130 The Vanguard said:I have not read 50 shades, but all this talk of porn has rendered me mildly intrigued. (Not enough to read it, or watch the movie). Is it tame? Kinky? Japanese? Weird? Banned in most civilized countries?
To be fair, some men and far more women find it very sexy, abuse or not. It didn't get popular just because the bad writing is funny.BeerTent said:Something more surreal, that wouldn't happen in real life, I don't really think it's right to publish abuse and call it sexy.
No. No basically. He IS a rapist. He forces himself on the female lead without her consent and while she was drunk. Textbook rape. He even pulls the bullshit "Well you enjoyed it, so it can't be rape" excuse.razer17 said:This is some bullshit. Not in the sense I'm saying it's not true, just that it's fucking stupid.
Bad Twilight fan-fic makes the author ludicrously rich, and then gets her a movie deal. How can you even film that book? It's fucking nonsense. Apart from all the sex that they'll have to deftly avoid showing, the whole book is utter shit.
Grey, who is apparently idolised by millions of undersexed women the world over, is one of the most villainous people ever. He's basically a rapist, abusive, manipulative, stalking piece of shit.
Go look at Twitter or Facebook. People (mainly women) are excited for this turd.Mcoffey said:I call bullshit. No one thinks this movie is going to be anything but bad twilight fan fiction robbed of the only thing people were interested in in the first place in order to secure the R rating.
Heard a hilarious rumor that they're going to be pushing for PG-13. I honestly have no idea what they think they can put in the movie to manage that...Anachronism said:I've not read the books, but I'm reliably informed that they're absolutely terrible. The only way this film could be of interest to me is if they go for the NC17 rating, which of course they won't because it's box office poison. It'll never be better than this, anyway.
I can explain it perfectly. It fits into the trope of woman fixing man and winding up in a "perfect" relationship at the end. If you've never watched a rom com, watch one of those and you'll see exactly why it's so popular. Read the romance books too. It's all similar shit. Though, some of it is more humourous than others. At least to me. But people eat it up because this is how "romance" is "suppose" to work.Vault101 said:its weird...because I actually cannot (for the life of me) figure out how it got so popularEd130 The Vanguard said:I have not read 50 shades, but all this talk of porn has rendered me mildly intrigued. (Not enough to read it, or watch the movie). Is it tame? Kinky? Japanese? Weird? Banned in most civilized countries?
and I don't mean that in a "hurr hurr bad twilight fan fic" way...I'm honestly baffled, if not for how badly its written but also because the erotica genre exist beforehand
the only thing I can come up with is one hell of a snowball effect......at one point the "huh whats that?" affect got everyone talking about it..not to mention the "oh lord is it THAT bad? I have to see" thing
to say its badly written is an understatementits funny...for some reason I really want to watch this movie...like...out of morbid curiosityZombie Badger said:How many do you think were just seeing how bad it could possibly be?