Seeing as how the game play in X2 was better then X.Gizmo1990 said:Did anyone actually want a re-release of X-2? I like the bonus ending (I like it when something has a happy ending) but the rest of the game is crap. Whenever I replay X I just go and watch the X-2 bonus ending on youtube so not seeing the appeal here.
Do you remember what happened literally 10 seconds after the awkward laugh scene?Tanis said:SEE: No TEE-DUS, or 'laughing scene'.
Considering $40 for an HD collection usually gets you 3 games, I'm going to say that no, it isn't worth it. $40 for 3 games is $13.33 per game, so price this at $26.66 and maybe I'll think about it, Square.CardinalPiggles said:Though I'm not sure if $40 is worth it though, even with both included.
I really think that 10 and 10-2 get a pass because they where the first final fantasy games to have full voice acting, next to real-life facial movements and cgi that was unheard of in 2001-04. Listen I do understand your frustration in this area. Still I really consider these games to be the last true in main franchise. This is due in part of if it's development team that worked on the games which are sadly no longer at square.Doomsdaylee said:Uh... wow...I was expecting much worse reactions.
Really people? X and X-2, the two games that STARTED the downfall of Final Fantasy, and everyone's creaming themselves over it? Granted, X was.....playable? in a pinch...and X-2 had a half decent battle system...? But are our expectations of FF so low that even these two turds being re-released in HD is such a big goddamn thing? Hell, the most enduring entertainment value from these two games is theory making in that "Tidus' name was never spoken, not a once in X, even in voiceless dialog. Is that a plot point?" (It's not, Squeenix isn't smart enough for that.)
I mean, I'm not going to bang on the "We need a FF7 remake!" drum, but if we're remaking old, less than perfect FF games, why not go to 8 or 9?
However, to play the devil's advocate here, it IS nice to see Squeenix following Yahtzee's idea of "Remake bad games, not good ones." Even thought this isn't a REMAKE it's a RE-RELEASE, so, so much for that.
Doomsdaylee said:Uh... wow...I was expecting much worse reactions.
Really people? X and X-2, the two games that STARTED the downfall of Final Fantasy, and everyone's creaming themselves over it? Granted, X was.....playable? in a pinch...and X-2 had a half decent battle system...? But are our expectations of FF so low that even these two turds being re-released in HD is such a big goddamn thing? Hell, the most enduring entertainment value from these two games is theory making in that "Tidus' name was never spoken, not a once in X, even in voiceless dialog. Is that a plot point?" (It's not, Squeenix isn't smart enough for that.)
I mean, I'm not going to bang on the "We need a FF7 remake!" drum, but if we're remaking old, less than perfect FF games, why not go to 8 or 9?
However, to play the devil's advocate here, it IS nice to see Squeenix following Yahtzee's idea of "Remake bad games, not good ones." Even thought this isn't a REMAKE it's a RE-RELEASE, so, so much for that.
I counter your video with the Japanese Version Dang I sell my ps3 and now this.Cecilthedarkknight_234 said:Hey i'm am perfectly fine with this on all levels. X-2 was not the best game in the main franchise but still it was playable and had some memorable parts.
It's just a remnant from the olden times when you could name your whole party. That obviously wouldn't work in a voiced game, so they settled on only being able to name the protagonist. That's all there is to it. The narrative of the game is driven by Tidus' fourth-wall breaking dialogue aimed directly at the player. He's not supposed to be a self-insert avatar for the player. It is his story after all...Tiamattt said:Think the whole not saying the name thing was a failed attempt to do the whole "insert yourself as the main character" thing games like to do. (Which imo in itself a dumb idea, so it's failing at a bad idea, ugh.)Of course that just made parts feel just pointlessly unnatural, and no idea why the entered name can't even show up in text. Overall it was a really stupid idea, sad that no one in development noticed it.
Fair enough, but either way it still felt like a unnecessary bad idea that hurt the game rather then add anything to it. It was his story, not blank person who is never mentioned's story.excalipoor said:It's just a remnant from the olden times when you could name your whole party. That obviously wouldn't work in a voiced game, so they settled on only being able to name the protagonist. That's all there is to it. The narrative of the game is driven by Tidus' fourth-wall breaking dialogue aimed directly at the player. He's not supposed to be a self-insert avatar for the player. It is his story after all...Tiamattt said:Think the whole not saying the name thing was a failed attempt to do the whole "insert yourself as the main character" thing games like to do. (Which imo in itself a dumb idea, so it's failing at a bad idea, ugh.)Of course that just made parts feel just pointlessly unnatural, and no idea why the entered name can't even show up in text. Overall it was a really stupid idea, sad that no one in development noticed it.
Better yet they can sell the game they don't like on ebay.Covarr said:Eh, it's not like X-2's presence somehow makes X any better or any worse. People who liked X and hated X-2 will easily be able to ignore the second one on here.
P.S. Thanks