F'ing Up Isn't So Bad

murdeoc

New member
Jun 11, 2011
20
0
0
i would like to point out the game WORMS, i still play that because of the awfully beautiful fuckups that happen all the time...
to me its one of the time-less games that stay fun in online multiplayer, no matter how good you are you will stil get to experience the 'it almost worked' moments and the 'damn i did not expect to work out right' moments...

to me it has to do with a luck factor in games... if you want skill to be the only factor, go play chess!
 

Frylock72

New member
Dec 7, 2009
193
0
0
I'd like to mention that hilarious fuck-ups are part and parcel of Diablo 2 and 3's Hardcore mode. There's nothing funnier than watching someone who's gotten to max level (and supposedly Inferno difficulty but Hell is funny too) die due to some circumstance, known or unknown. It's like the money shot, you expect them to fail at some point and when they do, everything's golden.

I bet you could make a web series just about dying in hilarious ways on Hardcore mode in D3.
 

Mike Fang

New member
Mar 20, 2008
458
0
0
This EP makes a lot of sense. You can't appreciate successes if it's practically handed to you and you never risk losing it. Fun practically can't be had if there's no challenge, and there's no challenge without the possibility of losing or making a mistake.
 

Danceofmasks

New member
Jul 16, 2010
1,512
0
0
This is why I play competitive Starcraft. Or Street Fighter.

Or endurance-based games such as Tetris.

Or brutal strategy games such as XCOM.

Heck, it's one of the reasons I might actually play Guild Wars 2 for more than a month. 'cos there are quests that you don't even get to see unless other quests are failed.
 

Alexnader

$20 For Steve
May 18, 2009
526
0
0
Zhukov said:
It occurs to me that it would be nice if games could find a way for the player to fail every now and again without getting a game over and subsequent failure-cancelling time rewind.
Its been done before but guess which game is going to do that now! Call of Duty Black Ops 2. If you fail a side mission you fail it and the story changes in response to that. Or at least, that's the theory.

Anyway this is why I love multiplayer, it's inherently organic and allows for the greatest victories and the most hilarious fuck ups. In particular, this is why I like games like Battlefield and Tribes.
 

Zolcos

New member
Nov 21, 2008
3
0
0
Reminds me of how Losing is Fun in Dwarf Fortress. Even if everyone dies and all is lost, what happened there gets incorporated into the lore of your installation of the game, and you may see references to it in future forts, like a crafter making a commemorative statue of something that happened back there
 

Tim Chuma

New member
Jul 9, 2010
236
0
0
I am enjoying people making their own stories whilst playing the DayZ mod, in particular when they try and play it like a traditional FPS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBwKrFy3qhc

I have enjoyed this series as there was definite progression in the story
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL68854CD9F0A0C4A7&feature=plcp

Even getting a helicopter after all the effort it takes does not guarantee you will win
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gy373G-ttA

Every let's play for the mod seems to play out differently so far.
 

Xakk Zeliff

New member
Mar 21, 2012
9
0
0
Some of my favourite games are ones where dusting up doesn't end the game as often as it does. You want to really make the player feel their losses? Make them clean up the mess if Dr. Venereal manages to blow off the prison gates or make them live with a character who has to jump to attack every enemy because the good doctor is fond of knee-high buzzsaw traps. The best part is there's no interruption of play.
Also this kind of stuff, and organic gameplay too, seems to work better anywhere the devs aren't putting the big spotlight. The more casual and seeming-normal-to-gameplay something is, the less likely it is to be overly scripted to do whatever Tony Hawk thing the devs imagined when they coded it.