If anything actually comes from this, I think we will officially have to stop making fun of the French. I mean, discovering life outside of Earth sorta gives you immunity in my book.
To play the devil's advocate: The idea of the Goldilocks zone is itself somewhat controversial, since it ignores things like tidal forces causing heat. (Like Europa's hypothesized oceans.) Also is rather carbon chauvinistic, as it assumes fairly Earth-ish life, built around CHON compounds.Greg Tito said:If a planet is too hot, all water would be steam but if its too cold then it would be ice, neither of which can support life. Luckily, a group of astronomers from the National Centre for Scientific Research in France believe that the fourth planet - unimaginatively labeled Gliese 581d - is just right.
Dense CO2? Not very habitable after all.:/Greg Tito said:"With a dense carbon dioxide atmosphere - a likely scenario on such a large planet - the climate of Gliese 581d is not only stable against collapse but warm enough to have oceans, clouds and rainfall," the report said.
I thought it was more the post-9/11 unwillingness to join the "Coalition of the Willing vs. Axis of Evil" Iraq punch-up. Freedom Fries and all that.Hardcore_gamer said:Is there any reason for why this stereotype even exists, besides the fact that it gives people who hate the French some misguided reason to make fun of them?
Actually, thinking logically, (not scientifically; I am not sure about the science behind this claim) one would think that beings on such a planet would be built smaller. Muscle mass is heavy and in large quantities inefficient. Why do you think animals have been evolving SMALLER rather than LARGER.Lazarus Long said:I think the bigger news is that if it could support life, it could have evolved it. The bad news: With twice Earth gravity, our future alien overlords would be built like friggin' tanks. The good news: Presumably, they wouldn't be able to breathe our atmosphere if they invade before we turn it into theirs.
This is most likely right. If we had suits/vehicles able to withstand the gravity, we would almost definitely be the alien overlords.Zeekar said:With double the gravity to worry about, I'd imagine everything would be about twice as small as what we have to compensate for being twice as heavy for their size.Lazarus Long said:I think the bigger news is that if it could support life, it could have evolved it. The bad news: With twice Earth gravity, our future alien overlords would be built like friggin' tanks. The good news: Presumably, they wouldn't be able to breathe our atmosphere if they invade before we turn it into theirs.
Yes... the 'populating' part could become extremely painful at that gravity level...emeraldrafael said:double earth's gravity.
You know, earth doesnt have that strong of a gravity to begin with, but I think our bodies would be severely hurt if we just went there and started populating.
And yet, we complain when we have to drive 20 miles to someplace.KnowYourOnion said:Wow that's stupidly close..........I mean twenty light years is nothing.
Short blue people live there who hate the fact that their people have only one female.Angelblaze said:yup.VGC USpartan VS said:I wonder if tall, blue people live there.
And they hate marines.
Or they all hate spartans, whichever underhanded and slightly obvious joke you perfer.
It would just take more time to get used to. Anyone going there would have to be in really good shape to start with, obviously. But weighing twice what you would on earth is really a small hurdle to overcome compared to the hurdle of actually finding a potentially habitable planet. Besides, it's a long enough journey. The people who finally land there probably won't even remember what earth's gravity felt like. They'll have been conditioned over the long trip to be used to the gravity they'll find on their destination planet.emeraldrafael said:double earth's gravity.
You know, earth doesnt have that strong of a gravity to begin with, but I think our bodies would be severely hurt if we just went there and started populating.
Well what else can we search for aside from what we already know works? It might seem a narrow focus, but at least it's a focus. I don't think we look for such parameters because we're convinced it's the only way for life to show up, it's because it's the only model we have to work with. We already know the circumstances that lead to life emerging on our planet, it's the most-likely scenario we know of that could spawn life elsewhere.Deathfyre said:This is cool, though I'm not a fan of life having pre-defined parameters. Aliens could be radically different from what we're used to, but we're so convinced that life can be defined by the way it's found here that we could end up passing right by a planet covered in life, just because we don't think anything can survive there