Flash Game Makes Players Beat Up "Tropes vs. Women" Creator

Recommended Videos

Fusioncode9

New member
Sep 23, 2010
663
0
0
I'm not the mad at her, I'm mad the moronic fanboys who donated over 160,000 to a woman just so she can create a few videos for YouTube. Go on indiegogo an see how many people actually need this kind of money yet idiots feel content with giving it to her so they can think they're solving a big issue.
 

clangunn

New member
Jul 26, 2010
21
0
0
AnAutisticDog said:
Meh, if it was about beating a man nobody would care.
Again, jumping in to address an older post but I think this is completely fallacious.

If it was a game to "beat up" either of the US presidential candidates then the opposing side's talking heads would cry offense. If it was an interactive beating of a religious leader (Billy Graham, Rick Warren, or the Pope) the mainstream media would cry foul. Hell, if a kid programed this game targeting another person at their school it would easily be understood as bullying. Targeting *any* specific individual for this type of vilification and victimization it would generally be considered offensive...

-edit to clean up my grammar a bit.
 

clangunn

New member
Jul 26, 2010
21
0
0
Fusioncode9 said:
I'm not the mad at her, I'm mad the moronic fanboys who donated over 160,000 to a woman just so she can create a few videos for YouTube. Go on indiegogo an see how many people actually need this kind of money yet idiots feel content with giving it to her so they can think they're solving a big issue.
Why are you mad at her "fans"? It wasn't your money. You have no right to feel morally self-righteous as to how they spend it.

Indiegogo is a great site. I have supported projects through Indigogo and Kickstarter. Why is one more praiseworthy than the other as a platform for "donations"? I don't think the majority of her supporters believe for one second that they are "solving a big issues."

I think they are contributing to raise awareness on a subject that is of personal interest and passion to them. Just like I don't think my donation to Tim Schafer's Adventure Game project is going to "save modern gaming"; or that my donation to Noah and his Family is going to "change the fact that health care emergencies are the leading cause of bankruptcy in America."

*ps: the captcha "two buck chuck" - why yes Mr/Ms Captcha Generating Algorithm, I would like some cheap wine to wash down this amazingly mature conversation.
 

meepop

New member
Aug 18, 2009
383
0
0
Irridium said:
John Funk said:
Of course, the great irony here is that the vicious response is not only giving Sarkeesian's cause way more publicity than it would have otherwise gotten, but does more to illustrate the problem of misogyny in nerd/gamer culture way more than a video series ever could.

Because seriously, making a videogame about beating a woman in the face for daring to express the point of view that a male-dominated industry doesn't always treat women and female characters like it should, is kind of just making her point for her.
Said it better than I could.

Seriously, why the hell are people so pissed about her making a video series showing that women aren't portrayed in the best light in games?
It might be (Now, I'm just gonna go out on a limb here) that because no one has actually watched her videos because: "Oh no! She's a woman! She doesn't know what she's talking about!" That could be part of it, along with the fact that people probably don't think it's going to help much.

Plenty of people have spoken out against sexism in video games before; this doesn't mean that her doing it is wrong, but I suppose those against it believe that it may not help anything, and it may just be her taking money and making a bullshit video series. Personally, I don't think the videos are gonna be badly made. I don't entirely agree with what she says; women are portrayed in a sexist way in video games, but it sells.

I'm just curious as to what she's gonna DO with all the money, because seriously, what is she gonna NEED $160k for anyway? Equipment? That's only a couple thousand dollars! This is probably yet another reason: She hasn't said what she's using the money for, other than equipment and stuff to make the videos. And she just gets to keep the rest? I know people decided to donate to her of their own free will, but honestly, not all of them considered the fact that she's probably gonna get to keep most of the money for herself.
 

toobie

New member
Jul 16, 2009
44
0
0
clangunn said:
Fusioncode9 said:
I'm not the mad at her, I'm mad the moronic fanboys who donated over 160,000 to a woman just so she can create a few videos for YouTube. Go on indiegogo an see how many people actually need this kind of money yet idiots feel content with giving it to her so they can think they're solving a big issue.
Why are you mad at her "fans"? It wasn't your money. You have no right to feel morally self-righteous as to how they spend it.

Indiegogo is a great site. I have supported projects through Indigogo and Kickstarter. Why is one more praiseworthy than the other as a platform for "donations"? I don't think the majority of her supporters believe for one second that they are "solving a big issues."

I think they are contributing to raise awareness on a subject that is of personal interest and passion to them. Just like I don't think my donation to Tim Schafer's Adventure Game project is going to "save modern gaming"; or that my donation to Noah and his Family is going to "change the fact that health care emergencies are the leading cause of bankruptcy in America."

*ps: the captcha "two buck chuck" - why yes Mr/Ms Captcha Generating Algorithm, I would like some cheap wine to wash down this amazingly mature conversation.
He doesn't say IndieGoGo is better than Kickstarter. He says the other causes need the money harder than she does, and gave IndieGoGo as an example.

The examples you give are games, made for your personal enjoyment. She claims to give a feminist look at gaming, which is supposed to change our viewpoint of sexism in our culture.

meepop said:
Irridium said:
John Funk said:
Of course, the great irony here is that the vicious response is not only giving Sarkeesian's cause way more publicity than it would have otherwise gotten, but does more to illustrate the problem of misogyny in nerd/gamer culture way more than a video series ever could.

Because seriously, making a videogame about beating a woman in the face for daring to express the point of view that a male-dominated industry doesn't always treat women and female characters like it should, is kind of just making her point for her.
Said it better than I could.

Seriously, why the hell are people so pissed about her making a video series showing that women aren't portrayed in the best light in games?
It might be (Now, I'm just gonna go out on a limb here) that because no one has actually watched her videos because: "Oh no! She's a woman! She doesn't know what she's talking about!" That could be part of it, along with the fact that people probably don't think it's going to help much.

Plenty of people have spoken out against sexism in video games before; this doesn't mean that her doing it is wrong, but I suppose those against it believe that it may not help anything, and it may just be her taking money and making a bullshit video series. Personally, I don't think the videos are gonna be badly made. I don't entirely agree with what she says; women are portrayed in a sexist way in video games, but it sells.

I'm just curious as to what she's gonna DO with all the money, because seriously, what is she gonna NEED $160k for anyway? Equipment? That's only a couple thousand dollars! This is probably yet another reason: She hasn't said what she's using the money for, other than equipment and stuff to make the videos. And she just gets to keep the rest? I know people decided to donate to her of their own free will, but honestly, not all of them considered the fact that she's probably gonna get to keep most of the money for herself.
I think the problem is that people HAVE watched her videos, and know she's bad at what she does.
 

Khazoth

New member
Sep 4, 2008
1,227
0
0
I promised myself I wouldn't post here, but its time I did.

Unless you are completely new to the internet this is inexcusable. Newground consistently brings out games that allows you to live through the worst tragedies.

Kaboom!: In mid-2002, Newgrounds received notoriety for hosting Kaboom!, a game in which the player controls an apparent Palestinian suicide bomber who kills men, women and children in Israel. Despite receiving criticism and calls for its removal from the internet by congresswoman Nita Lowey, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, and other groups, Newgrounds continued to host the game.

Oklahoma City Escapades: Newgrounds received more negative attention in 2004 by refusing to remove Oklahoma City Escapades from its site, which is a game that was developed by Joshua Bend, that spoofs the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. It was eventually removed when Bend deleted his account.

Jeff Weise: Jeff Weise, infamous for the Red Lake High School massacre, posted a violent animation on Newgrounds.com. Its existence was discovered and reported after the massacre.

The Virginia Tech Massacre media blowout: V-Tech rampage, Virginia Tech Shootout!, and others achieved fame from allegations of making fun of the Virginia Tech massacre.



All of that, but this is what you focus on? Yeah, this is a disgusting game, but its /NEWGROUNDS/. I think the plot of the game is disgusting and the person who made it is disgusting as well. But really? This is what you guys, and Newgrounds is gonna make a stand on? Yeah, she swindled people into paying her to make a webseries, of course dissenters are gonna happen and Newgrounds has a history of taking it too far.




So remember.. You can make a game about killing innocent people by the truckload, reliving horrible events that the survivors would like to forget.. But a tasteless game by a troll depicting beating up a woman? Thats the line.
 

clangunn

New member
Jul 26, 2010
21
0
0
toobie said:
The examples you give are games, made for your personal enjoyment. She claims to give a feminist look at gaming, which is supposed to change our viewpoint of sexism in our culture.
Actually, one was a game (but since I don't like adventure games it was more to support the developer) and the other was a donation request for a family asking financial assistance to cover the costs of providing assistance to a child that had a devastating accident. Most definitively not made for my enjoyment. Did I feel a certain amount of self gratification in that? Yes. Similar to how I felt for supporting a game I will probably never play.

Anita Sarkeesian never once claimed to be some messianic figure how has descended from the ivory tower to "fix" sexism in gaming culture. She is, and has, created online video content to try to raise awareness about the issues. Which she has, to the degree that even her most rapid detractors are still stuck on her. Kind of like Sarah Palin, actually...

toobie said:
I think the problem is that people HAVE watched her videos, and know she's bad at what she does.
Bad at what she does? What I think she does is make videos about topics meant to raise awareness of tropes in video games and then go out and raise money to continue doing so. If that is actually "what she does" then she is a hell of a success. In fact we can quantify it; she is exactly $152,922 more successful than she had originally anticipated needing to be.

Where is your cool extra $150k?

Capitano Segnaposto said:
OPINION TIME!

She is a dumb ****.
I don't like her.
If it wasn't illegal I would punch her in the face (albiet only once).
She is only in it for the money and doesn't care about improving video games as a whole.

Fuck. You. Anita Sarkeesian.
At least Capitano is open and honest. It is his personal belief, based on his long and storied ongoing, platonic, relationship to Anita Sarkeesian that she is "in it for the money."

However, if that is the case, can't we hold nearly all developers to the same standards? I was playing CS when it was still an open source mod for HL. Does that mean that I should want to punch the various Valve programmers for trying to capitalize on a product to continue to produce higher quality games based on the original mod? Playing beta through Source I can tell you that it (generally) only got better with time and funding.
 

Blade_125

New member
Sep 1, 2011
224
0
0
{
I almost called you a complete idiot for this post, but I see where you are going now. It's based on what kind of story is being told, the elements in it that would lead to how a character might dress.

So a better way to put it is not ask Lara Croft why she wears short shorts, but ask the creative team what kind of character and world are they trying to create, which will obviously influence the attire.

One problem with your line of argument is comparing a video game character to contemporary people. Yes plenty of girls show a lot of skin out in the street, and there is nothing wrong with that. But that is while walking in a city in their day to day lives. Would they wear the same thing while traversing through a jungle ruin? That is wear chinves point becomes important. Can the creative team justify their decisions. If the character is travelling in the arctic and she is wearing a bikini, then that doesn't make a whole lot of sence. You argue that women can wear what they want, which I agree with. But are these character wearing what most women would want in a specific environment, or wearing what the designers think young men want them to wear?

Too much of this argument devolves into argung specifics that detract from the main point. It isn't that female characters dress a certain way. It is do these characters have a real personality, or are they put there only for visual stimulation for boys. If most female characters do not have a real personality then that is sexist. If they do have real personalities then it is not. Maybe we should go through a large number of games and keep tally of women with depth and women who are window dressing. Or you know, get someone else to do it for us.

Of course even this is narrowing into specifics more than we should. The problem isn't video games. The problem is the general attitude that the average person has, and this is reflected in all media.

I don't think Anita is the best at these videos (but I applaud her for trying to open peoples eyes at least). If you don't like her pervious videos then watch a movie called Miss Representation. A great documentary that looks at media as a whole and how it influences attitudes. It even shows how boys are raised to be closed off from their emotions and it makes it very hard to treat women with respect (I am not doing this explanation justice). If anyone reading this feels they are not sexist, or mor importantly that sexism doesn't exist, and doesn't like Anita's videos then I challange you to watch Miss Representation.[/quote]

I've been camping and seen women in short shorts. And when rock climbing. I was taught to abseil buy a guy who was wearing uber short short I only remember because I looked up and saw as he was abseiling down his shorts had ridden up and his white buttcheek was exposed. He didn't see any problem with wearing short short and I'd only ever have remembered this guy wearing them from the sudden white buttock sight.

So Lara Croft wearing short shorts... Why is that so hard to believe? What is interrupting your suspension of disbelief? What is so inconceivable about a woman or anyone wearing short shorts especially in very hot climates? In Lara's home she wears long baggy trousers.

"If the character is travelling in the arctic and she is wearing a bikini"

But she never did that. I don't think any character has ever seriously done that. Lara went to the Arctic and Antarctic with thick full body covering clothes. She made a crash landing from a plane flying from a tropical climate to a snowy mountainous environment, she found a coat and donned it. It's all totally in line with what a character like Lara Croft might WANT TO WEAR. Without JUST the contrivance of what suits boys.

How about you actually play through the Tomb Raider series and you'll see Lara Croft is no playboy "playmate" who just acts flirtatious, she is never flirtatious, she has a very definite character motivation though not exactly refined for one of the first video games generations with voice acting. Any even attempt at physically encroaching on her is met with sudden violence.

I was really disappointed by the Angelina Jolie Tomb Raider films as they got the Lara Croft character so completely and utterly wrong, she seemed too much like Trinity from the Matrix at times and no where near animately harsh enough. Lara is an English rose with thorns... and a submachine gun. She's cruel and murderous, more like the anti-hero of a spaghetti western. She wasn't serene and in touch with local customs, she'd indifferent and condescending when she talks with a monk, only focusing on the next treasure.

"Maybe we should go through a large number of games and keep tally of women with depth and women who are window dressing. Or you know, get someone else to do it for us."

And what good would that achieve? Art by a quota? That's open to misuse and calamity.

Sarkeesian is totally unsuited to such an analysis as she is a sex-negative reactionary social conservative, who makes sloppy and facile arguments that only stand by to criticism by her censoring all criticism on her videos and straw0manning trolls.

I'll try to check out this "Miss Representation" when I can. But consider that if you except me to accept that boys are indoctrinated to think a certain way, also consider that girls are indoctrinated to think a certain way as well, such as to denigrate and think less of women who are openly sexual without any good reason to consider them that way.

You can see why apart from Lara Croft there are not many female protagonists. Because they don't want to have to deal with all this bullshit of every characteristic about them second guessed and people willingly refusing to suspend their disbelief and pull back the curtain and demand the writer explain why he did this for the audience rather than stop - just for a second, and consider the character in the fiction.}




You still have a problem with not seeing the forest for the trees, but at least you are arguing in the right direction. I meant to use Lara Croft as a hypothetical as the character is well known. Personally I have never done any of the activities that the character has, so I have no idea if her attire is practical. And that is the main point I am making. Does the outfit suit the character and activity/location. But even then that doesn't matter as much if she is a real personality and her decisions and actions make sense. (and yes I agree the movie was terrible. I didn't bother watching the second movie).

I think Ms Sarkeesian is over the top in her views, but there is a reason. Usually when someone is over the top in reaction it's because they have been mistreated. While she pushes to far in on direction it is because she realizes how most women are treated. Maybe instead of attacking her you can point out the flaws in her arguments. Human reaction is to push back when someone pushes us. Attacking her directly isn't going to help her see how to change her arguments, which is why all the idiots attacking her accomplish nothing (although most of them don't want this discussion, they want her to shut up and get into the kitchen).

Unfortunetly most young girls are brought up wrong just as young boys are. They don't feel they are worth enough, and unfortunetly so many things tell them this. One of the issues with dress is that the media makes it seem that girls need to dress slutty to impress boys and that is the only reason, which means their self worth is joined to how well they can impress boys. I'll totally conceed that boys grow up thinking how to impress girls. Hormones control a lot of what we do when we are young. The only problem is that most boys can still keep their own self worth, it is harder for girls to do. But this continues to improve which is why we have to continue to have these discussions. This is all discussed in Miss Representation.

""Maybe we should go through a large number of games and keep tally of women with depth and women who are window dressing. Or you know, get someone else to do it for us."

And what good would that achieve? Art by a quota? That's open to misuse and calamity.
"

Art by quota was not my point. THe question is are female characters in video games given depth and real personalites or are they complete window dressing there onyl to serve young males fantasies. I don't think you will find too many that will be hard to classify as one or the other. The point of this is to show how women are depicted in the genre overall, which is a greater reflection of how women are looked at in society.

Thanks for the professional response. It is nice to discuss issues with someone who doesn't resort to namecalling, making stuff up, or pulling in points that have no relevance to the argument.

Edit. I still have issues making the quotes work so sorry for the poor post.
 

clangunn

New member
Jul 26, 2010
21
0
0
Buretsu said:
clangunn said:
toobie said:
I think the problem is that people HAVE watched her videos, and know she's bad at what she does.
Bad at what she does? What I think she does is make videos about topics meant to raise awareness of tropes in video games and then go out and raise money to continue doing so. If that is actually "what she does" then she is a hell of a success. In fact we can quantify it; she is exactly $152,922 more successful than she had originally anticipated needing to be.

Where is your cool extra $150k?
I don't have a cool extra $150k because I don't have a vagina, and therefore people don't think me so worth protecting from all the mean, evil men in the world to throw money at me to tell all the mean, evil men in the world how mean and evil they are and how they should be ashamed to be men.
Two questions:

1) So, having a vagina is an economic benefit? I am sure that a sizable chunk of the world population would disagree with you on that one.
2) After seeing all the hate spewing on these forums I went and actually watched her videos. Out of the handful of videos I watched I don't think I ever saw her claim that "men are evil" or that "men are mean." Can you give me examples?

That is merely your frightened interpretation of an argument that far more nuanced than you seem to be willing to give it credit for.
 

Khazoth

New member
Sep 4, 2008
1,227
0
0
Buretsu said:
clangunn said:
toobie said:
I think the problem is that people HAVE watched her videos, and know she's bad at what she does.
Bad at what she does? What I think she does is make videos about topics meant to raise awareness of tropes in video games and then go out and raise money to continue doing so. If that is actually "what she does" then she is a hell of a success. In fact we can quantify it; she is exactly $152,922 more successful than she had originally anticipated needing to be.

Where is your cool extra $150k?
I don't have a cool extra $150k because I don't have a vagina, and therefore people don't think me so worth protecting from all the mean, evil men in the world to throw money at me to tell all the mean, evil men in the world how mean and evil they are and how they should be ashamed to be men.
This post, a thousand times, this post. Pretty much sums up the situation.
 

Bocaj2000

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,082
0
0
She asked for $6000 in order to produce a movie. Does anyone know how much a movie costs to make? Any idea at all? Indie movies usually cost between $500 and $500,000. She was asking for $6000 but made $160,000. This is still chump change as far as movie making goes. It is not a scam.

She only asked for $6000 in order to buy about 100 video games in order to be well researched for her upcoming video. You don't want her to be ignorant about her topic, do you?
 

Khazoth

New member
Sep 4, 2008
1,227
0
0
Bocaj2000 said:
She asked for $6000 in order to produce a movie. Does anyone know how much a movie costs to make? Any idea at all? Indie movies usually cost between $500 and $500,000. She was asking for $6000 but made $160,000. This is still chump change as far as movie making goes. It is not a scam.

She only asked for $6000 in order to buy about 100 video games in order to be well researched for her upcoming video. You don't want her to be ignorant about her topic, do you?

I honestly can't tell if your being glib or not. But let's assume your not.


She's making a youtube video, and I could send you to people who do that for free, with high production values...
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
John Funk said:
"but also uses the excuse that she is a woman to get away with whatever she damn well pleases. Any form of constructive criticism, even from fellow women, is either ignored or labelled to be sexist against her."
Aaaaaaand this is where I definitively call bullshit.

Having commented on, criticised and questioned her content on Youtube, I've gotten actual responses that were more or less open dialogue. While it is unlikely we will ever see completely eye to eye, she has hardly cried sexism because some big bad man (as far as she knows) has questioned her.

Maybe it's just the frothing responses people give her that are the issue. Maybe it's the fact that I seem not to have approached things with the same caustic outlook. In short, maybe it's because when I criticised her, it was not because my panties were in a bunch that someone was criticisng our precious video games.
 

clangunn

New member
Jul 26, 2010
21
0
0
clangunn said:
Buretsu said:
clangunn said:
toobie said:
I think the problem is that people HAVE watched her videos, and know she's bad at what she does.
Bad at what she does? What I think she does is make videos about topics meant to raise awareness of tropes in video games and then go out and raise money to continue doing so. If that is actually "what she does" then she is a hell of a success. In fact we can quantify it; she is exactly $152,922 more successful than she had originally anticipated needing to be.

Where is your cool extra $150k?
I don't have a cool extra $150k because I don't have a vagina, and therefore people don't think me so worth protecting from all the mean, evil men in the world to throw money at me to tell all the mean, evil men in the world how mean and evil they are and how they should be ashamed to be men.
Two questions:

1) So, having a vagina is an economic benefit? I am sure that a sizable chunk of the world population would disagree with you on that one.
2) After seeing all the hate spewing on these forums I went and actually watched her videos. Out of the handful of videos I watched I don't think I ever saw her claim that "men are evil" or that "men are mean." Can you give me examples?

That is merely your frightened interpretation of an argument that far more nuanced than you seem to be willing to give it credit for.
So I realized that I shouldn't just make trite statements about the fact that women are still recognizably economically disenfranchised. Here are some sources, if you have access to academic journal compilers you can get full-text otherwise you might be stuck with abstracts. These are (mostly) peer-reviewed pieces.

Here are results from a 20 second Scholar.Google.com search:

What works and what doesn?t: How to increase the representation of women in academia and business. Virginia Valian. GENDERCHANGE IN ACADEMIA 2010, 317-328 [http://www.springerlink.com/content/gu49787343507316/]

WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CORPORATE AMERICA: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION. Allied Academies International Conference, 2009 [http://www.alliedacademies.com/Public/Proceedings/Proceedings24/AOCCC%20Proceedings.pdf#page=6]

Changing Attitudes Toward Women IT Managers. 2010 [http://www.igi-global.com/article/changing-attitudes-toward-women-managers/45875]

Women at the Bargaining Table: Pitfalls and Prospects. 2009 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00222.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false]

The Effect of the Proportion of Women on Salaries: The Case of College Administrators. 1987 (forgot to put the date filter on and found this) [http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2392740?uid=3739672&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=47699125579767]
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Khazoth said:
She's making a youtube video, and I could send you to people who do that for free, with high production values...
But not everyone does, and a lot of people do it for money either professionally or to recoup costs. The major difference being that she's being singled out as if this were some sort of novel idea when it's not. Additionally, she was up front about where the money was going, which actually is kind of novel.
 

clangunn

New member
Jul 26, 2010
21
0
0
Buretsu said:
clangunn said:
Two questions:

1) So, having a vagina is an economic benefit?
When begging for money? You better believe it.
So, again, two responses:

1) Can you somehow prove that the majority of successfully crowd-funded projects are posted by females? Where is the evidence? I am not trying to be rhetorical. I personal don't know the gender split in successfully funded crowd sourced projects.

2) If your right, and having a vagina increases the probability of success in "begging for money" why is it that most panhandlers I have encountered in metropolitan markets across the world are primarily males?
 

Khazoth

New member
Sep 4, 2008
1,227
0
0
clangunn said:
2) If your right, and having a vagina increases the probability of success in "begging for money" why is it that most panhandlers I have encountered in metropolitan markets across the world are primarily males?

Mainly because when a woman has low scruples and wants money, she doesn't need to panhandle.


(Reference Material: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Nicole_Smith)
 

mfeff

New member
Nov 8, 2010
284
0
0
The part I personally find the most amusing is that this "game" by all accounts is an "art game".

Let's see what the criteria is here...

...or whose structure is intended to produce some kind of reaction in its audience

yup

Art games typically go out of their way to have a unique, unconventional look...

yup

...an art game/sculpture is using its very structure to produce some kind of reaction

goodness...

...art games are artistic creations from the outset...

of this I have little doubt... my oh my...

As an aside since when was it a crime to solicit for cash moo-la money as it relates to the continued pontifical espousing upon a topic, especially humanities?

All I see here is that this topic today is worth about 160k... nicely done.
 

tyriless

New member
Aug 27, 2010
234
0
0
Buretsu said:
clangunn said:
toobie said:
I think the problem is that people HAVE watched her videos, and know she's bad at what she does.
Bad at what she does? What I think she does is make videos about topics meant to raise awareness of tropes in video games and then go out and raise money to continue doing so. If that is actually "what she does" then she is a hell of a success. In fact we can quantify it; she is exactly $152,922 more successful than she had originally anticipated needing to be.

Where is your cool extra $150k?
I don't have a cool extra $150k because I don't have a vagina, and therefore people don't think me so worth protecting from all the mean, evil men in the world to throw money at me to tell all the mean, evil men in the world how mean and evil they are and how they should be ashamed to be men.
It sounds like your envious of her gender. I guess we could start a kick-starter so we could all help you with that.
 

Khazoth

New member
Sep 4, 2008
1,227
0
0
tyriless said:
It sounds like your envious of her gender. I guess we could start a kick-starter so we could all help you with that.

This woman and her supporters are truly the most upright, forward thinking people this humble planet has ever seen.