Depends how eclectic your tastes are, actually. Plenty of people like every single one of the ridiculously varied things Radiohead's put out for different reasons.Twilight_guy said:No. If a band only produces song that you like, then they have no variation, sing the same thing over and over and thus are crap. If they have variation and do different things then I can guarantee you that at least one song will be different from what you like and thus they aren't flawless. Luckily it doesn't really matter since you have the ability to choose things and listen to things you like as opposed to those you don't.
Yeah I know there is always that joker that likes everything, but I'm always inclined to think that either he/she is lying to try and make themselves seem music savvy, or don't have any taste (someone who could enjoy listening to a leaking faucet and enjoy it as music).OhJohnNo said:Depends how eclectic your tastes are, actually. Plenty of people like every single one of the ridiculously varied things Radiohead's put out for different reasons.Twilight_guy said:No. If a band only produces song that you like, then they have no variation, sing the same thing over and over and thus are crap. If they have variation and do different things then I can guarantee you that at least one song will be different from what you like and thus they aren't flawless. Luckily it doesn't really matter since you have the ability to choose things and listen to things you like as opposed to those you don't.
Nah, sorry. As hard as it is to believe, there really are people out there who like multiple things for multiple reasons.Twilight_guy said:Yeah I know there is always that joker that likes everything, but I'm always inclined to think that either he/she is lying to try and make themselves seem music savvy, or don't have any taste (someone who could enjoy listening to a leaking faucet and enjoy it as music).OhJohnNo said:Depends how eclectic your tastes are, actually. Plenty of people like every single one of the ridiculously varied things Radiohead's put out for different reasons.Twilight_guy said:No. If a band only produces song that you like, then they have no variation, sing the same thing over and over and thus are crap. If they have variation and do different things then I can guarantee you that at least one song will be different from what you like and thus they aren't flawless. Luckily it doesn't really matter since you have the ability to choose things and listen to things you like as opposed to those you don't.
Wow, people actually read those things?xplosive59 said:Are you not a fan of Drone music or do you just not think GY!BE did them well? I did read your review on Sputnikmusic a while back and I was not sure what your opinion on the genre was, I happen to love Drone music and thought that GY!BE were able to translate their sound well into a genre that is disliked by the majority of casual listeners. Just curious.AnarchistFish said:OT: See, Godspeed You! Black Emperor are my favourite band of all time but their music isn't really divided into songs... I love all their work apart from their occasional drone tracks.
Do you actually think it's hard to have a range of tastes? It's not rare for me to make my morning playlist and put in a hip hop song, an ambient/electronic song, a pop rock song and a hardcore punk song all together.Twilight_guy said:Yeah I know there is always that joker that likes everything, but I'm always inclined to think that either he/she is lying to try and make themselves seem music savvy, or don't have any taste (someone who could enjoy listening to a leaking faucet and enjoy it as music).OhJohnNo said:Depends how eclectic your tastes are, actually. Plenty of people like every single one of the ridiculously varied things Radiohead's put out for different reasons.Twilight_guy said:No. If a band only produces song that you like, then they have no variation, sing the same thing over and over and thus are crap. If they have variation and do different things then I can guarantee you that at least one song will be different from what you like and thus they aren't flawless. Luckily it doesn't really matter since you have the ability to choose things and listen to things you like as opposed to those you don't.
Oh yay, another Nadja fan.AnarchistFish said:Well no, I don't really listen to drone. Not much anyway. I just didn't find much in these tracks to really bite into although they're nice to have in the background. To me they just felt like bits present to fill in the spaces between the main tracks and I'd rather they'd fitted them in with the main bodies of music. The drone-y bit at the end of BBF3 (can you call it drone?) is pretty amazing though and there's the odd bit of drone, in one form or another, that I like here and there. E.g. The Angelic Process, Nadja. But then again, those bands include other styles too.
SlaveNumber23 said:System of a Down
Ninja'd twice... I had one job...Zacharious-khan said:System of a down
So you're telling me my pick, Florence + The Machine, released these:Twilight_guy said:No. If a band only produces song that you like, then they have no variation, sing the same thing over and over and thus are crap. If they have variation and do different things then I can guarantee you that at least one song will be different from what you like and thus they aren't flawless. Luckily it doesn't really matter since you have the ability to choose things and listen to things you like as opposed to those you don't.
Ah HIM, I like everything before Dark Light. Dark Light and everything afterwards was complete crap in my opinion.EcoEclipse said:My 'flawless band' is HIM.
I just. It's so good. All of it. Absolutely, 100% all of their songs are awesome.There are, of course, songs I like less than others (typically slower ones, as I'm not keen to slow songs by default). But none of them do I dislike.
Something about the way everything sounds, and just the general emotions in HIM's music resonates with me. I also heavily enjoy the more ethereal and metaphoric lyrics (e.g. from the above song, "I unlit the light to embrace the dark, to be near but not to turn into you"). It kind of pulls me out of a song when the lyrics are more grounded in reality.
I completely agree, I feel as though their new album would of been better if they incorporated the two Drone tracks actually into the two main songs instead of having them separate otherwise they feel like filler tracks IMO. Also, The Angelic Process fucking slay, I have been listening to a mix of them, Type O Negative, Alcest, Boris and Jesu today while finishing up my coursework.AnarchistFish said:Wow, people actually read those things?xplosive59 said:Are you not a fan of Drone music or do you just not think GY!BE did them well? I did read your review on Sputnikmusic a while back and I was not sure what your opinion on the genre was, I happen to love Drone music and thought that GY!BE were able to translate their sound well into a genre that is disliked by the majority of casual listeners. Just curious.AnarchistFish said:OT: See, Godspeed You! Black Emperor are my favourite band of all time but their music isn't really divided into songs... I love all their work apart from their occasional drone tracks.
Well no, I don't really listen to drone. Not much anyway. I just didn't find much in these tracks to really bite into although they're nice to have in the background. To me they just felt like bits present to fill in the spaces between the main tracks and I'd rather they'd fitted them in with the main bodies of music. The drone-y bit at the end of BBF3 (can you call it drone?) is pretty amazing though and there's the odd bit of drone, in one form or another, that I like here and there. E.g. The Angelic Process, Nadja. But then again, those bands include other styles too.
They're ok, I just didn't really get into them like I did with the main pieces of music. I'm thinking of Yanqui and Allelujah here, when the drones were separate to the main songs; I actually I think they had really good drone elements on Lift Your Skinny Fists, where they let those moments build out of the music. The ending of Static, for example.