CoD is amazing on its own merits tbh. its awsomeJourneyThroughHell said:Favorite series (probably former): Call Of Duty.
Here's why:
-Excellent gameplay mechanics
-Memorable set-pieces
-Good graphics
-Either it's IW or Treyarch, the campaign is always fast-paced and a real thrill.
But since I have no doubt that CoD won't really be good without West, Zampella, Alderman, Gigliotti... yes, I guess I'm waiting for a game by Respawn guys.
Modern Warfare 2 did not sacrifice anything - the campaign has always been pretty shor and there it was even shorter but it had coop.stuartclement said:CoD is amazing on its own merits tbh. its awsomeJourneyThroughHell said:Favorite series (probably former): Call Of Duty.
Here's why:
-Excellent gameplay mechanics
-Memorable set-pieces
-Good graphics
-Either it's IW or Treyarch, the campaign is always fast-paced and a real thrill.
But since I have no doubt that CoD won't really be good without West, Zampella, Alderman, Gigliotti... yes, I guess I'm waiting for a game by Respawn guys.
Xbox live/PSN killed MW2 by sacrificing the story for multiplayer, whitch is frustrating because multiplayer is repetative and infuriating when you get the steryotyped american 10 year old siging songs through his mic
But whe the series was good, CoD2 + 4 the single player was really good.
It doesn't really help the game if you need a book to explain everything in the story. The game should justify itself and not need to be explained.HG131 said:Halo. I know it's a bit cliche, but let me explain. When you actually read the books (GASP! READING!) you see how deep the story is. You see the politics behind the genocidal actions of the Covenant, you see how the UNSC abducted 6 and 7 year olds and trained them to become super-soldiers and then did things like covering their bones in metal or injecting them with different serums to make them stronger, faster, and all around better than anyone else, killing or disabling about half of them in the process. When you read the books, you get ALOT of backstory. Trust me, if you haven't read them yet, do yourself a favor and get reading.
Any game which needs books made after it to give the story depth, doesn't have a good story.HG131 said:Halo. I know it's a bit cliche, but let me explain. When you actually read the books (GASP! READING!) you see how deep the story is. You see the politics behind the genocidal actions of the Covenant, you see how the UNSC abducted 6 and 7 year olds and trained them to become super-soldiers and then did things like covering their bones in metal or injecting them with different serums to make them stronger, faster, and all around better than anyone else, killing or disabling about half of them in the process. When you read the books, you get ALOT of backstory. Trust me, if you haven't read them yet, do yourself a favor and get reading.
Both controllers are the exact same. Seriously the only reason you'd like one over the other is if you're not use to the other. The whole " TEH 360 CONTROLLER IS BETTER FOR SHOOTERS LOLOLOL" is a pathetic argument probably made from the fact that there's really no positives to owning a 360.Sober Thal said:I have a ps3 and tried the killzone demo..... I just can't play a FPS w/ a playstation controller, it doesnt feel right. Same goes for computer FPS, it's not good for your wrists, plus it's like playing on easy when you 'point and click', and I don't understand how people can say asdw is how you are ment to play FPS games, it's just awkward. That being said, I think I would like killzone w/ a 360 controller.
The 'twiddling my thumbs' is more of a challenge, and I prefer more difficult and rewarding experience than paying $500 for a computer that is obsolete in a year. Oh wait, 500 is is a really small number..... lets go back (sorry if I'm being a troll) I bought a 360 for $300 5 years ago, I bought a computer for $800 3 years ago. Guess which I can play Metro 2033 on.
I ain't no Senators son. I wish I was, then I might be on a different band wagon. But as far as FPS go, I am a single player type who prefers the more ergonomically correct 360 controller than anything else (I say correct cause it's my opinion).
I don't think FPS games can be 'the best' for long, they all get old eventually, so I would say the best as of today (that I have played, and yes this is only my favorite few) would have to be:
Metro 2033
Modern Warfare 2
Aliens vs Predator
Halo ODST
Total respect for this one.GrinningManiac said:TF2, because it's so well balanced that anyone can win, and everyone's (largely) a good sport about things
No, I agree. I loved the first game, I can't remember much about it though. I thought the second one was no were near as good, I just didn't enjoy it.Hardcore_gamer said:snip
Iwata said:Alright, first of all, I want this to be a topic proper discussion, so flamers, trolls and fanboys, check your prejudices at the door.
With the recent hub-ub regarding MW2, and what seems to be the overall declining quality of both shooters and their fanbases, I mean to ask you what is your favourite FPS series (or game) and why.
I'll get the ball rolling with the Killzone series. To me, it is my favourite FPS series based on a number of factors:
- It has a very strong cast of villains, with a very impressive voice cast to back it up. The Helghast are visually impressive and intimidating, and as you delve into the universe, their history is fascinating, to the point where you wonder if the ISA are really the good guys in the story after all.
- The visuals of the latest installment are amazing. Many complained that the game felt too drab and grey, and while I do agree that seems to be more the norm than the exception these days, I'll argue that if there's a world suited for such visuals, it is indeed Helghan.
- Likewise, much has been said of the weapon handling. I take a very strong objection to such criticism, and believe it stems from the fact that we have been "spoiled" by most shooters. Having handled firearms, Killzone 2 is the only, I say again, the only game I have ever played that properly transmits what a cumbersome and "heavy" experience it really is to handle such weapons. It felt realistic, whereas in most shooters, the weapona handle as if they are made of balsa wood, and it never feels "just right".
And that's it.
Your choice?