Thunderous Cacophony said:
I think that a lot of people have a shallow understanding of radical feminism (there's something called the patriarchy, and it's about men oppressing women)and they object to the idea that men are consciously trying to oppress women.
But what do I know? In my mind, everyone described as radical
looks like this.
Actually, they tend to object to the notion of women oppressing men. Because that's totes what feminism is.
Personally, I prefer tubular feminism.
erttheking said:
Heh, I'm not gonna lie, that was pretty funny.
You do know that this thread is going to explode now though, right?
I'm pretty sure they busted out their satirising stick for this one.
hazabaza1 said:
So is The Escapist just going "hey guys we need more traffic, make stuff that's guaranteed to create arguments" to their content creators now?
Who else is doing this? I mean, the closest I can come in the shows I watch on here is Jim Sterling, and he's always been a bit of an iconoclast.
Then again, most of the rest of the shows I watch involve LRR, and they're too Canadian to offend anyone.
Unless you hate Canadia. In which case, they're sorry.
Daystar Clarion said:
inb4 the radical feminists come to take our penises away.
Too late! Your wang has been NINJAD!
Lono Shrugged said:
I don't really see how anyone could be offended by this comic...
This is gaming media. People got offended that a woman was going to dryly read off tropes, called her a radical, and threatened to rape and kill her.
Oh, you meant....
I mean it is just a male writer using a strawman argument to make a spurious issue out of said strawman's semantic error of mixing up 2 definitions rooted in the same issue, and wheeling out a reference to a dated colloquial term that will register a humour response out of the demographic of readers, with a punchline so disconnected from the set-up as to make you wonder why he picked that paticular issue at all. Except of course, knowing hot button topics generate views...
Which, except for the "generating views" bit is a strawman in itself.
It's not really a semantic error, given the context in which it's used, re-used and clarified. On this site, no less.
Buuuuuut why let that stop you.
Scrumpmonkey said:
I have to go now. My planet needs me
Oh man, if Erin dies on her way back to her home planet, I will be a sad panda.