Funny events in anti-woke world

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
8,727
2,892
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Here's some good news. Suspending teachers over QR Codes

Summer Boismier of Norman High School in Oklahoma gives kids QR codes on Brooklyn library’s list of banned books – Oklahoma News (darik.news)

We finally saved the children

Also, I'd like to draw your attention to a link later in the piece

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/07/30/crt-oklahoma-tulsa-schools-shame-white

A bunch of teachers did a 20 mins training session on becoming aware of biases. This is apparently shaming white people. The school district has been given a lower grade
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,364
8,864
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
I'm sure that chump is a conservative, but this is an interesting aspect of modern libertarian thought.

Experience has suggested to them that the problem with democracy is that the people as a whole tend to like and vote for things liberatarians don't like: taxes, welfare, social programs, etc. As a result, many libertarians have started to become extremely ambivalent or even hostile to democracy. I would personally argue that this is deeply problematic to any libertarianism short of outright anarchism (which solves the problem by rejecting the existence of the state).

If the proposal is to limit the vote, that's kind of interesting, because how do they propose to do that? Let's suggest that banning women and non-whites from the vote is a massive problem they aren't going to solve. But imagine minimum wealth/income criteria to vote: is that actually going to turn out a conservative / libertarian government? In the immediate term, polls suggest yes. But long term... one might recall that this was what the UK was in the 1800s, and the middle and upper classes just ended up voting in a series of social programs, and extended the franchise.

If the aim is to restrict voting to guarantee a relatively narrow political ideology, you don't want a democracy at all. What you want is a single party state (akin to China under the CCP) where people can vote for representatives, but the representatives are all vetted and selected by the party.
You've put too much thought into it. They only get as far as "the country would be great (for me) if only people like me had power".
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,224
3,362
118
So this is legit good news if it goes through, but I don't want to make a thread for it
What's the unhinged right wing reactionary rhetoric going to be to denounce this, I hear you all ask.

Screenshot_2022-08-24-22-54-56-82_4641ebc0df1485bf6b47ebd018b5ee76.jpg


Bad first?



Followed by whatever the opposite is?



Followed by the inevitable rip back to predictable reality.



Ok just a tiny bit of sugar maybe.

 
Last edited:

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
6,557
930
118
Country
USA
What's the unhinged right wing reactionary rhetoric going to be to denounce this, I hear you all ask.
The perfectly rational right wing (or really any wing) reaction is "we're in an aggressive inflationary period, why the hell would you free up hundreds of millions for specifically the college educated? That's just going to drive up costs further for the poorest people!"

Seriously, this is a directly regressive policy, one that disadvantages those with the fewest advantages while further incentivizing colleges to pump up prices without any expectation that the degrees will be worthwhile.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,355
6,856
118
Country
United States
Followed by the inevitable rip back to predictable reality.

Who could've possibly thought that "we actually won and if we didn't it's cheating" could come back to bite them so quickly?

Ok just a tiny bit of sugar maybe.

Good ol' conservative empathy gap. It's wasn't a problem until it directly affected them
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
8,727
2,892
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
The perfectly rational right wing (or really any wing) reaction is "we're in an aggressive inflationary period, why the hell would you free up hundreds of millions for specifically the college educated? That's just going to drive up costs further for the poorest people!"

Seriously, this is a directly regressive policy, one that disadvantages those with the fewest advantages while further incentivizing colleges to pump up prices without any expectation that the degrees will be worthwhile.
Ah, so like a company tax cut or a tax cut for the rich (or a cut to the IRS so they can't chase down tax dodgers.) It cuts the budget of normal tax payers and increases company prices and profits
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dalisclock

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,355
6,856
118
Country
United States
The perfectly rational right wing (or really any wing) reaction is "we're in an aggressive inflationary period, why the hell would you free up hundreds of millions for specifically the college educated? That's just going to drive up costs further for the poorest people!"

Seriously, this is a directly regressive policy, one that disadvantages those with the fewest advantages while further incentivizing colleges to pump up prices without any expectation that the degrees will be worthwhile.
Rick Scott and the GOP specifically want to raise taxes on the poorest people for no fucking reason while defending right wing YouTube channels and podcasts getting hundreds of thousands of dollars for free from the government, sit down

 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,355
6,856
118
Country
United States
You know, I think I understand why conservatives are hyperventilating about adding more IRS agents. No way these are all legit

 
  • Like
Reactions: Dalisclock

Kwak

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2014
2,210
1,716
118
Country
4

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,364
8,864
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
Rick Scott and the GOP specifically want to raise taxes on the poorest people for no fucking reason....
Well, it's technically not "no fucking reason", but pretty close: There's a conservative line of thought which posits that, if poor people had to pay income tax, they'd suddenly agree with rich conservatives that taxation is unfair and start voting Republican.

Of course, there's others who think that poor people don't pay any kind of taxes ever and are leeches on society, because apparently things like sales tax don't exist.
 

McElroy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2013
4,582
377
88
Finland
Or just donate thousands, so every inch of wall is covered. Put the totalitarian farce on full display.
It's pretty obvious they only have to display one in each building. The donation part must be a funding thing so the schools don't have to set up shoddy prints or gouge money for the posters.
 

Schadrach

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 20, 2010
2,003
358
88
Country
US
God fucking forbid you accept the consequences of your actions, "party of personal responsibility"
I'd tell him to start his own gaming convention if he hates what GenCon is doing so much, but nobody should have to deal with the OpSec requirements to run an event that would upset the people doing that would upset.


What the fuck


"One from Many" but Latin used to be our motto before that got too commie in the red scare. Was a much better motto.
The authors of that law were very concerned with attempts to use it to troll, they very clearly and specifically defined what must be on such a poster to be required to display it and that anything not required is forbidden. Everything except requiring it to be in English. I kind of want to see a bunch of posters translating the motto into Russian be donated so they are required to be displayed.

They should donate some rainbow-colored ones, too.
Not sure you can get away with that - a patterned background might be seen as imagery in a way that a solid background isn't.

It's pretty obvious they only have to display one in each building.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 1.004, Education Code, is amended to
read as follows:
Sec. 1.004. DISPLAY OF NATIONAL MOTTO. (a) A public
elementary or secondary school or an institution of higher
education as defined by Section 61.003 must [may] display in a
conspicuous place in each building of the school or institution a
durable poster or framed copy of the United States national motto,
"In God We Trust," if the poster or framed copy meets the
requirements of Subsection (b) and is:
(1) donated for display at the school or institution;
or
(2) purchased from private donations and made
available to the school or institution [in each classroom,
auditorium, and cafeteria].
(b) A poster or framed copy of the national motto described
by Subsection (a):
(1) must contain a representation of the United States
flag centered under the national motto and a representation of the
state flag; and
(2) may not depict any words, images, or other
information other than the representations listed in Subdivision
(1).
(c) A public elementary or secondary school and an
institution of higher education may accept and use private
donations for the purposes of Subsection (a).
SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
Act takes effect September 1, 2021.


I could see the argument for that reading, but I'm not sure it's necessarily right. I mean, the law says that a poster that meets 1.004.b if donated must be displayed. There's nothing that specifies a limit on how many to display. To be fair, there's also nothing that specifies a limit on how long it is to be displayed, so you could hypothetically have one spot and just swap out for the most recently donated poster whenever a new one is donated.
 

McElroy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2013
4,582
377
88
Finland
I could see the argument for that reading, but I'm not sure it's necessarily right. I mean, the law says that a poster that meets 1.004.b if donated must be displayed. There's nothing that specifies a limit on how many to display. To be fair, there's also nothing that specifies a limit on how long it is to be displayed, so you could hypothetically have one spot and just swap out for the most recently donated poster whenever a new one is donated.
It also says schools may accept and use donations. I don't think they will end up displaying any posters they don't want (unless they dislike the whole thing, of course).
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,355
6,856
118
Country
United States
Every conservative accusation is a confession, and the reason conservatives believe George Soros is behind everything is because they literally have their own pocket billionaires behind everything

 

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,224
3,362
118

SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Twitter have removed an influence operation from their networks that promoted U.S. foreign policy interests abroad, according to a report on Wednesday by researchers from the Stanford Internet Observatory and the research company Graphika.
It was the first time that an influence campaign pushing U.S. interests abroad had been discovered and taken down from the social media platforms. The operation, which ran for almost five years on eight social networks and messaging apps, promoted the views, values and goals of the United States while attacking the interests of Russia, China, Iran and other countries, the researchers found.
The accounts behind the operation often posed as news outlets or took on the personas of people who didn’t exist, posting content in at least seven languages, including Russian, Arabic and Urdu. The posts criticized countries like Russia for engaging in “imperialist wars” in Syria and Africa, while praising American aid efforts in Central Asia and Iraq.

Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, said the “country of origin” of the accounts was the United States, while Twitter said the “presumptive countries of origin” for the accounts were the United States and Britain, according to the report.

“It’s the first time we’ve seen something like this,” said Renée DiResta, research manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory. “It’s the first time we’ve seen a pro-U.S. foreign influence operation taken down by Twitter and Meta.”

Researchers have long suspected that influence operations promoting U.S. interests abroad have been active, though no specific efforts had previously been documented and studied.
The U.S. government does not comment on covert programs. Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder, a Pentagon spokesman, said the agency “will look into and assess any information that Facebook or Twitter provides.”

Twitter and Meta, which do not permit accounts that covertly work together to promote certain narratives, removed the accounts in July and August, according to the report. The other platforms that were used in the operation were Telegram, Google’s YouTube, and the Russian social media networks VKontakte and Odnoklassniki.

Twitter said it had no comment on the Stanford and Graphika report. Meta did not respond to requests for comment. While the companies have regularly revealed influence operations they remove from their platforms, they have not published a report on the pro-U.S. campaign.
The only U.S. operations that Meta has previously named were domestic efforts, such as when the company revealed in October 2020 that a marketing firm, Rally Forge, was working with the conservative organization Turning Point USA to target Americans.

In an email, YouTube said it had terminated several channels posting in Arabic, Farsi and Russian to promote U.S. foreign affairs, including channels linked to a U.S. consulting firm, as part of an investigation into coordinated influence operations. It said its findings were similar to those in the Stanford and Graphika report.

Ms. DiResta said the tactics used in the pro-U.S. influence campaign resembled those used by China. While Russia often seeks to sow divisions in its online campaigns, China is more focused on promoting a rosy picture of life in the country, she said. With the pro-U.S. campaign, the goal was also “to show how awesome the U.S. was in comparison to the other countries,” she said.

The researchers were notified of the pro-U.S. online campaign by Meta and Twitter so they could analyze and study the activity, according to the report. The researchers found that the operation largely focused on messaging that favored the United States and the West through memes and false news stories, while criticizing Russia, China and Iran.

The accounts tailored their language and messaging to different regions, the researchers said. In one effort, a group of 12 Twitter accounts, 10 Facebook pages, 15 Facebook profiles and 10 Instagram accounts were created between June 2020 and March 2022 to focus on Central Asia. Some pretended to be media outlets with names like Vostochnaya Pravda. At least one account posed as an individual using a doctored profile photo based on an image of the Puerto Rican actress Valeria Menendez.

Those accounts then posted about the food shortages caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in Central Asian countries and cheered on pro-Ukrainian protests in those places.

Another set of 21 Twitter accounts, six Instagram accounts, five Facebook profiles and two Facebook pages targeted Iranian audiences between November 2020 and June 2022, according to the report. Some of the personas used profile pictures that were likely created using artificial intelligence. Many tried to present themselves as real people by interspersing Iranian poetry and photos of Persian food between political messages.

Posts from the effort claimed that the Iranian government took food from its citizens to give to the Hezbollah militant group, or highlighted embarrassing moments for the country, such as a power outage that reportedly caused the Iranian chess team to lose an international online tournament.
On Facebook and Instagram, dozens of posts also negatively compared opportunities for Iranian women with those for women abroad. Other messages criticized Iran’s support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and claimed that the stance would invite economic repercussions for Iranians.

Another group of accounts focused on the Middle East, applauded efforts by the U.S. Agency for International Development in Iraq and discussed positive interactions between American troops and Syrian children.
The group of accounts that focused on Central Asian countries also mentioned U.S.A.I.D. 94 times on Twitter and 384 times on Facebook, while hailing Washington as a reliable economic partner that could help reduce the region’s dependence on Russia.
None of the campaigns reached a large audience. Most of the posts and tweets received a “handful” of likes or retweets, researchers noted, and only 19 percent of the covert accounts that were identified had over 1,000 followers.
.