Jesus, get this woman to a Hobbycraft or something, there's got to be more to life than this.
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
Isn't it possible for someone to sue this clown or something?
Look at that: another butt-fuck with nothing better to do and never had any action in their life.
You're talking about the same mindset which claimed that legalizing gay marriage was a slippery slope to legalizing bestiality. (Because gay people are less than human, you see.)
The dual claims of "she hated reading as a kid" and "none of this was in books when I was a kid" are fucking wild. Like, all of this shit is in Shakespeare...if you pay attention and parse old English.
Interesting discussion about the Tim Ballard type beliefs of modern rightwing LDS groups like that victims of sex trafficking (though they use "child" in their rhetoric for emotionally manipulative marketing tactics, all ages of sex trafficking victims are equally in need of support, and trafficked just the same anyway) can only be saved through subsuming them into the Mormon covenant instead of, you know, changing material conditions, focused therapy and strong non-judgemental support networks. Also what was that about believing indigenous Americans aren't the true original inhabitants of the land??
Is suitable for just audio listening podcast style also if important shits gotta get done.
Is suitable for just audio listening podcast style also if important shits gotta get done.
She needs something like state-mandated videogames to keep her thug behaviour off the streets.
Last edited:
I try not to give click baiters and fake outragers any attention, but I am glad Sistah Punk called out those assholes' bullshit. Considering the great reception Castlevania Nocturne is already getting, I am glad these idiots/"fans" have been drowned out and most actual sensible people are enjoying a great show for what it is.
Yes, it's missing almost an entire world's worth of culture, history and insights to fragile existence developed by other groups of people, and therefore tolerance and appreciation for all that is 'other'.
Societies need exposure to alien stuff, that's how they grow and mature.
(well, the respectful type of exposure, not "let's enslave the natives and mine their lands and force capitalism on them" type of exposure)
Last edited:
Right, because you said it was unrealistic for people to act different than their "basic biological urges".
I'm pretty sure by the logic here, Batman is responsible for every AIDS death. Batman didn't do anything to stop those deaths.
Sex is one of the most basic biological urges there is.
You consider the government's level of responsibility for dealing with a public health crisis to be no greater than the responsibility held by a single private citizen? How incredibly bizarre.
You, as a person, can choose to act contrary to your biology.
A single, fictional private citizen, thank you very much.
I can indeed. I can choose to suppress perfectly natural urges, to eat and sleep and mate and seek shelter. I can choose to live a pointlessly celibate, puritan life, and eat only unprocessed grains and seeds, if I want. I don't, because I don't want to live a life of self-repression, but you're right that I could make that choice.
But expecting people to do so? Expecting it of millions upon millions of people? That's unrealistic, yes, to a ludicrous extreme. And as public health policy its just a non-starter.
And here I was, thinking we elect governments in order to use their mandate & tax money to protect society and act in ways that are communally beneficial. Silly me!
Donald Trump has been highly vocal in attacking Arthur Engoron, the judge presiding in his fraud trial. Has called him a "Democrat operative", "should be disbarred", "interfered in an election" etc.
...so it's more than a little odd that Trump's legal team did not submit a request for damages to be decided by jury. It was an option available to them, in the form of a routine form. His legal team didn't do so, meaning the damages will now be decided by... Arthur Engoron.
Several commentators have suggested it was incompetent oversight on the part of the legal team. I would've thought that was unfeasible a few years ago in a trial concerning a former President, but this is the man that hired Sidney Powell.
...so it's more than a little odd that Trump's legal team did not submit a request for damages to be decided by jury. It was an option available to them, in the form of a routine form. His legal team didn't do so, meaning the damages will now be decided by... Arthur Engoron.
Several commentators have suggested it was incompetent oversight on the part of the legal team. I would've thought that was unfeasible a few years ago in a trial concerning a former President, but this is the man that hired Sidney Powell.
Trump is obviously scared, otherwise he wouldn't be so vocal and adamant about it.
His legal team knows they got nothing. So they are not going to even bother. I consider that a good thing.
I have a weird feeling it’s only contempt of court if you do or say these things IN court. Uttering them outside of that is just an exercise in opinionated speech.
My thought is that you typically do this kind of thing only when you believe that a jury would absolutely soak you. Judges tend to be more reserved in deciding damages.
It's contempt for the court, but "contempt of court" generally only applies if you don't comply with some direct order or ruling, or break rules or customs.