Funny events in anti-woke world

Cicada 5

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2015
2,797
1,384
118
Country
Nigeria
Didn't people vote for Kamala for her horrible policies?
You've yet to explain how these policies are even bad.


Or just try to find this stuff on the pages they cite, most of this stuff isn't there.
Condemn single mothers while promoting only “traditional families”: Partly false
The plan calls on the secretary of Health and Human Services to repeal policies that subsidize single motherhood, but it does not “condemn” single mothers. It does promote traditional family structures, however.
“For the sake of child well-being, programs should affirm that children require and deserve both the love and nurturing of a mother and the play and protection of a father,” Severino writes.



Eliminates federal agencies like the FDA, EPA, NOAA, and more: Partly false
There are no calls to eliminate the FDA or EPA in their respective sections of the document. In a chapter on the Department of Commerce, however, author Thomas Gilman argues that the president should consider whether “The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) should be dismantled and many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories.”



Raise prescription drug prices: Partly false
The report’s section on FDA policy calls for the repeal of a Medicare price negotiation program created by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that allows Medicare to directly negotiate the prices of certain high-expenditure drugs that don’t have generic versions. Other price control measures established by the IRA, such as a cost-sharing cap on insulin and an out-of-pocket spending cap for Part D enrollees, would be canceled if the IRA were fully repealed as advocated in the plan. However, the plan also encourages repealing laws that prevent pharmaceutical competition, which it argues would expand the availability of generic drugs and drive prescription drug prices down.



End civil rights and DEI protections in government: Partly false
Several sections of the plan argue for curtailing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations in government offices, but there is no call to end civil rights protections.
In his chapter on the Department of Justice (DOJ), Gene Hamilton writes that the department should spearhead “an initiative demonstrating the federal government’s commitment to nondiscrimination.” He adds: “The department should also lead a whole-of-government recommitment to nondiscrimination and should be working with all other federal agencies, boards, and commissions to ensure that they are both complying with constitutional and legal requirements and using their authorities and funding to prevent discrimination not only internally, but also at the state, local, and private-sector levels.”
Some of these "partly falses" seem contradictory. And the article does indeed confirm that the project proposes eliminating the Department of Education.
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
9,040
3,034
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Some of these "partly falses" seem contradictory. And the article does indeed confirm that the project proposes eliminating the Department of Education.
Well, it actually says it's just going to underfund it so it doesn't work. They don't really want to waste their time drumming up the super majority just to get rid of the DoE....

Or maybe they do. It's a really bad idea to think that anything and everything is off the table. Just as it is a bad idea to try to predict what Trump will do. He usually makes it up on the spot, so even he doesn't even know
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,208
6,477
118
Or maybe they do. It's a really bad idea to think that anything and everything is off the table. Just as it is a bad idea to try to predict what Trump will do. He usually makes it up on the spot, so even he doesn't even know
No they will almost certainly not can the DoE. Governments like power. For the most part, a government is rarely going to give up the means by which it could intervene if it wanted to. It can deregulate and empower entities to do as they please, but that's not necessarily the same as giving up power, or potential, over them.

Trump is not the issue here. Trump wants to be president, not to do the job of president. He wants to float around, give orders, command respect and obedience. His only ambition is self-aggrandisement - adulation and wealth. What really needs to be considered are what all his cabinet and all sorts of other appointees will do, because they are the ones with the ambition, work ethic, ideology and maybe talent to get anything done. Trump mostly won't pay much attention to any of it unless it causes him some bother that might give him negative rep.
 

Phoenixmgs

The Muse of Fate
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
9,620
830
118
w/ M'Kraan Crystal
Gender
Male
You've yet to explain how these policies are even bad.





Some of these "partly falses" seem contradictory. And the article does indeed confirm that the project proposes eliminating the Department of Education.
UNrealized gains tax is horrible, just google it. The housing plan would make houses more expensive and the president doesn't have control over what actually causes supply issues like local zoning laws. Price controls have been done in the past and only make things worse (FDR and Nixon).

So you mean there's nuance to a lot things vs something being the worst thing ever? Like I said, simply go to the pages cited for the most horrible things Project 2025 is claimed to have, and you won't find it on the pages. Stuff like cut social security or medicare for example. And several the complaints about getting rid of agencies is just them making said agency part of another bigger agency vs it's own separate thing. It's a shit-ton of misinformation in those social media posts.

Well, it actually says it's just going to underfund it so it doesn't work. They don't really want to waste their time drumming up the super majority just to get rid of the DoE....

Or maybe they do. It's a really bad idea to think that anything and everything is off the table. Just as it is a bad idea to try to predict what Trump will do. He usually makes it up on the spot, so even he doesn't even know
They've been wanting to get rid of the Department of Education forever (you guys are acting like it's some new evil thing when it's not). With how bad schooling has gotten in the US, it might not be a bad idea. I'd have to look into more to have an actual opinion on whether it would be good or not to get rid of it. There's probably a bunch of nuance to it that is always ignored and people don't actually look into it.
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
12,077
6,371
118
Country
United Kingdom
UNrealized gains tax is horrible, just google it.
I'm assuming you think this is terrible because of a misconception that it obligates people to sell. Am I wrong? That was the misconception last time this was discussed.
 

Phoenixmgs

The Muse of Fate
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
9,620
830
118
w/ M'Kraan Crystal
Gender
Male
I'm assuming you think this is terrible because of a misconception that it obligates people to sell. Am I wrong? That was the misconception last time this was discussed.