Uh, maybe I have more faith in my nurses than others do, but I feel confident even a first year student on any medical vocation will spot the difference pretty quick. In fact I think anyone who's sensation of touch works is going to rumble you.
Presented without comment.
Form a contract with similar stipulations with another company, I would imagine, though they would probably bail it out before that. But no, Novo Nordisk does not operate without oversight or regulation. They wouldn't be maintaining such a surplus if they did.Sadly that's how it usually works. Like what is the UK going to do if Novo Nordisk goes under for some reason?
My argument does not require elected representatives to be career politicians. I'd generally prefer they weren't, in fact, though I would want members of the Cabinet to have broad political experience.It makes a world of difference based on your argument.
Lol, nice twisting of my argument. Suffice it to say I do not believe the national response to climate change would be better under direct democracy. People have demonstrated their unwillingness to adapt their behaviour time and time again, and personal convenience matters more to most than sustainability or responsibility.Glad to know climate change is just one of those things that happens, no worries.
No, the vast majority of elected representatives are not wilfully spreading Covid misinformation. New Zealand has experienced... what, 28 deaths in all?That seems to be all of them, from what I can tell.
Give people access to those advisory groups, and almost nobody will bother to go to them. In truth, most detail on the votes in the Commons is all publicly accessible. Yet people simply do not bother to read it. People don't check how their MP voted. People don't read the proposals. Hell, plenty of NGOs do publish their reports, and the public do not read them. The overwhelming majority of the public do not bother to even access the information that they do have access to on the political votes/ process.Give people access to those advisory groups and suddenly that's not a problem anymore. What you've really been arguing this whole time is that elected representatives are better at listening to advisors, which is also laughable.
Well, yes, that much is known, but at the time most of us had the naive assumption that the next election would be accepted by most republicans if Trump lost, even if he didn't accept it himself. The extent of the brainwashing his followers have presented now is unprecedented in the modern era of politics and is frankly quite frightening to see continue in real time, along with financial and ideological backing by powerful psychotic individuals and institutions to keep them fed and motivated to God knows what actions we've yet to look forward to.Remember when Trump put in 300 judges around the country over the course of his administration
It's already happening
Novo Nordisk isn't a UK company, the UK can't provide oversight to them. There are only 3 companies in the west that produce insulin, all three are contracted by the UK to provide their insulin (along with everyone else's) and none of them are in the UK or have production facilities within the UK. You import 100% of your insulin from foreign private companies. If one of them goes under or is for any reason unable to fulfill their contract, you're hosed.Form a contract with similar stipulations with another company, I would imagine, though they would probably bail it out before that. But no, Novo Nordisk does not operate without oversight or regulation. They wouldn't be maintaining such a surplus if they did.
Cool, then I don't see why you object to direct democracy.My argument does not require elected representatives to be career politicians. I'd generally prefer they weren't, in fact, though I would want members of the Cabinet to have broad political experience.
You are correct. When policy is explained straightforward it is popular, when it's explained intentionally poorly, it does poorly, who knew?Lol, nice twisting of my argument. Suffice it to say I do not believe the national response to climate change would be better under direct democracy. People have demonstrated their unwillingness to adapt their behaviour time and time again, and personal convenience matters more to most than sustainability or responsibility.
People may respond to polls in support of the broad principle of renewable energy. But they'll also steadfastly refuse to live near windfarms or accept higher taxes to fund it. Remember what I said before, about how you can word the same question in different ways in a national poll, and get completely different results?
I actually meant the unrepresentative part. Though I will always say, be careful in using a low population island country as a point of data in a pandemic. Not saying they handled COVID poorly or anything, but still.No, the vast majority of elected representatives are not wilfully spreading Covid misinformation. New Zealand has experienced... what, 28 deaths in all?
Because right now reading them does nothing. People don't have any sort of direct voice and trusting politicians to keep promises is a meme. There's no incentive to read reports, and even following raw voting records can be misleading.Give people access to those advisory groups, and almost nobody will bother to go to them. In truth, most detail on the votes in the Commons is all publicly accessible. Yet people simply do not bother to read it. People don't check how their MP voted. People don't read the proposals. Hell, plenty of NGOs do publish their reports, and the public do not read them. The overwhelming majority of the public do not bother to even access the information that they do have access to on the political votes/ process.
Yes, and I also remember when conservatives went absolutely apeshit over a Democrat being elected President, started forcing Republican legislators to actually live up to campaign promises and primary the ones who wouldn't, turned out en masse and flipped both House and Senate from previously "filibuster-proof" supermajorities. And replicated those results on state, county, and municipal levels.Remember when Trump put in 300 judges around the country over the course of his administration
It's already happening
Remember when we were all making fun of China for being super-dictatorial and demanding that men be "manly"? Texas saw that and thought "I like the cut of their jib."
Did we warp back to 1967 when I wasn't looking?
Trump is utterly incapable of giving credit to others when he can claim it all for himself.Mastodon does use an open-source code, but with caveats including giving credit and attribution to the original creators. As is typical, Trump has bypassed all that in his effort to create a MAGA knockoff of Twitter.
What I find deliciously ironic is that he apparently wants credit for the Covid Vaccine but he completely squandered that by spending months and months ranting about the "Stolen Election" instead and now the same people who actually want to listen to him talk are the same people who distrust the vaccine.Trump is utterly incapable of giving credit to others when he can claim it all for himself.
Would now be a good time to point out Australia is currently being run by a Conservative government federally? And in at least a couple of states?So this happened and this isn't just the Guardian reporting this either. And while I hate to signal boost idiots this'll get remarked on eventually.
Rightwing US pundit Candace Owens compares Australian government to the Taliban, calling it a ‘tyrannical police state’
The high-profile conservative commentator quips: ‘When do we deploy troops to Australia?’www.theguardian.com
Candace Owens says US should invade Australia
A conservative US commentator has suggested America should “invade” to liberate Australians from “tyrannical” Covid-19 restrictions, likening the country to the early stages of a dictatorship under Hitler or Stalin.www.news.com.au
I don't really know if she's jesting or this is just another Freedom Loving Conservative looking for an excuse to beat someone else with the American Freedom Stick because she's triggered. "You're not free enough for me, so we should subjugate you to make you free! You'll learn to appreciate Freedom when we take yours away!"
I mean, the fact she mentions about spending billions and 2 decades to lose in Iraq then to go on a rant about invading another democracy makes me wonder if she's just fucking insane or stupid or just doesn't know what argument she's trying to make?
ScoMo is left of Sleepy JoeWould now be a good time to point out Australia is currently being run by a Conservative government federally? And in at least a couple of states?
Pretty sure that to American right wingers that just makes them slightly less commie then they would be otherwise.Would now be a good time to point out Australia is currently being run by a Conservative government federally? And in at least a couple of states?
It's true. We live in a country where even duck-beaver hybrids can kill you, and the damn grubberment won't let us have guns.Pretty sure that to American right wingers that just makes them slightly less commie then they would be otherwise.
After all, Australia has universal healthcare and that's basically Communism right there. I'm not even joking a lot of America right wingers see it that way
*Don't mention the Emu War, Don't mention the Emu War*It's true. We live in a country where even duck-beaver hybrids can kill you, and the damn grubberment won't let us have guns.
It's true. We live in a country where even duck-beaver hybrids can kill you, and the damn grubberment won't let us have guns.
We have all the BEST fences. Fences you wouldn't believe*Don't mention the Emu War, Don't mention the Emu War*
So, how about those rabbits and the fences that contain the rabbits? Pretty crazy, eh?
Remember the time of the Black Panther who policed the streets and did a better job generally. And then the second amendment somehow wasn't that importantSee, if the government let the citizens have unfettered access to guns, then the citizens could shoot cops and none of that would be happening, back the blue!