NED isn't the only thing. There's also the thirty different things mentioned at the very start; that's just one country.
It's just the example you quoted. And which fell apart almost instantly.
You can pile up all the examples you can find; it still won't constitute a good reason to end tens of billions in poverty relief and disease prevention.
Why do you always find an excuse to take the side of US empire?
It's more that I don't automatically assume anything that originated in the US must be evil for that reason alone, because that's asinine.
"Poverty relief"
[...]
"disease prevention"
Am I to understand from this that you simply don't believe the genuine programmes focusing on those issues
exist? That it's all conspiracy? I can't really tell what you're actually claiming, because it's just vague gesticulation as usual.