Jerry Seinfeld just compared the Free Palestine movement to the KKK.
Your principled opposition to the death of political opponents fell apart almost instantly, didn't it?Wow. Nevermind. You guys can all get shot for all I care.
Look, firstly, I've seen enough of CriticalGaming's posts to know he's got some substantial right-leaning sympathies, so that's a lot of it.As an aside, I would just like to as how you can look at the Republican party, then look at the Democrats (or the Left in general) and then point your finger at the Left and say they're the problem, and they're the cult?
Fundamentally, all states have the attitude that the state has a unique right to commit violence. In most states, particularly democracies, the state wishes it to be believed that the state, it's laws, its governance, are fair, neutral, representative of (with a mandate from) and for the good of the people.Why does the term political violence always refer to singular actions or events, but never the actual legislative violence that is done, by actual politicians, against the anonymous masses who are affected by their decisions?
The political violence being enacted by this administration, by those with power to abuse and use against out of favour demographics, is the real evil.
I don't know how you could have missed it. Basically during the Floyd protests, a bunch of protesters drove law enforcement and city personnel out of part of Seattle and declared it the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, renaming it to the Capitol Hill Organized Protest a few days later. Basically they took over part of Seattle, had a few scuffles with counter protesters and police, did a ton of property damage, someone died as a consequence, etc.The Seattle one is new to me but whatever happened happened.
I'd be curious what the per capita rates look like in comparison. Because the percentage of trans people I've met who have been plausibly accused of sexually assaulting a child is much higher than the percentage of cis men I've met who have been plausibly accused of sexually assaulting a child, but given the orders of magnitude difference in sample sizes whether or not that reflects anything real or if I just have bad luck in the trans folk I've happened to meet is a question worth withholding judgement over.Most trans people don't molest children.
It's ghoulish, but part of me wonders if in his last moments of consciousness he accepted his own immediately impending death as part of that exchange, or if he only said that because he believed he would never be the one handed the check. AKA, how strongly did he actually believe his own claimed beliefs? Or was he just a chronic masterdebater?His OPINIONS were that "some" gun deaths were a "rational, prudent deal" in exchange for second amendment rights, and famously mocked empathy as damaging New Age BS, so if anything you're embarrassing yourself by having any for him, whose violent death was consistent with his own views anyway.
Or someone who's kid died in a school shooting that Charlie Kirk saw as an unfortunate but necessary sacrifice in a prudent and rational exchange for his political views who decided that maybe he should be the next one handed that particular bill.I can't wait to find out that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a conservative for his about-face and downplaying of the Epstein files.
Harris was quite literally a DEI hire. To be fair so was Biden as Obama's VP. POTUS candidates almost always choose someone who's seen as "shoring up" their weak points based on imagery rather than any kind of competence, and sometimes that imagery is specifically about race and/or sex. Obama needed a boring milquetoast white corporate Dem, same as Trump needed someone who seemed as much like a boring traditional conservative with Pence because his cult wasn't really in full control of the GOP yet so he needed an "adult in the room", Biden needed someone who would act as contrast to him being the boring milquetoast white corporate Dem that Obama needed.
The USA is not a particularly violent place - certainly in the sorts of geographical and social areas the average political shitraker operates. Thus the odds are that he never expected he would be one of the people who would get it in the neck (if you'll pardon the pun).It's ghoulish, but part of me wonders if in his last moments of consciousness he accepted his own immediately impending death as part of that exchange, or if he only said that because he believed he would never be the one handed the check.
If this is the worst thing Kirk has said, this is not much. Him saying "These people are sick" is referring to the NCAA, not trans people. I'm pretty sure he's not talking about lobotomies based on the context of the rest of the what is said, plus who would even think to bring back lobotomies as well. I was trying to find the full interview of this, but I couldn't. In that bit of googling, I didn't find anything Kirk said about trans people that 80% of the population doesn't agree with. If that take merits being killed, then you're OK with over 250 million deaths. Outside of a couple videos of Kirk OWNING liberals on campus I clicked on on Youtube like 2 or 3 times, I know very little about him. He did seem genuinely up to debate in good faith (which is rare) as he would congratulate and shake a student's hand if the student made good points.Since evidently people can reply to me (even though I've been banned in the thread so I am unable to respond), here is my response to your quote Phoenix.
You didn't Google very hard @Phoenixmgs if you couldn't find his abhorrent views on Transgender people
Here's a video just in case you want to still figure out a way to whitewash his comments as a misunderstanding or some other bullshit
"We should have taken care of it like we took care of it in the 50s and 60s"
Spoiler Alert; that care included shit like classifying it as a mental illness (with good ol 50s and 60s methods like electric therapy and lobotomies being "The Cure"), getting arrested for "Crossdressing" and other flimsy things to persecute them legally, and then just good old social stigmatizing of 50s and 60s mentality.
"Someone should have took care of it the way we took care of it in the 50s and 60s"If this is the worst thing Kirk has said, this is not much. Him saying "These people are sick" is referring to the NCAA, not trans people. I'm pretty sure he's not talking about lobotomies based on the context of the rest of the what is said, plus who would even think to bring back lobotomies as well. I was trying to find the full interview of this, but I couldn't. In that bit of googling, I didn't find anything Kirk said about trans people that 80% of the population doesn't agree with. If that take merits being killed, then you're OK with over 250 million deaths. Outside of a couple videos of Kirk OWNING liberals on campus I clicked on on Youtube like 2 or 3 times, I know very little about him. He did seem genuinely up to debate in good faith (which is rare) as he would congratulate and shake a student's hand if the student made good points.
He is referring to just men being men and saying no essentially..."Someone should have took care of it the way we took care of it in the 50s and 60s"
You guys can have actual proof right in front of your faces about what guys like Kirk believe about Trans People and somehow can still just go NU UH! Oh but Kirk is POLITE about his nasty fucking racist, sexist, and anti LGBT points!
This is why neither of you are worth bothering talking to about this kind of stuff. Every piece of shit human being gets constant "benefit of the doubt" because they use pretty language and say GG after spewing their hatred.
Where the fuck were you when people were celebrating the murder of democrat senator a couple of months ago?Honestly I'm just surprised this place has fallen this hard. Even a decade ago you couldn't get away with actually calling for political assassinations on the forums.
Be happy all you want. Go be a terrorist somewhere else. Or preferably not at all.
Just waiting for "he only did it because leftists exist, this will keep happening until we get rid of them".Well look at that, I was right, it was a conservative who shot Kirk. MAGA world went from "death penalty" to "thoughts and prayers" real quick there.
View attachment 13819
www.techdirt.com
This is this weird position where Trump being a horrible person somehow makes the democrat bad. Yeah the dem tried to go after Trump, but for good reason, Trump deserved to be gone after even back then. If the cop go after a murder, should they just accept the murder trying to kill them?NOT DEFENDING TRUMP (I really don't like Trump, which ya'll don't believe me for some reason, I voted for Chase Oliver), but look at the democrat behavior after Trump won in 2016. Did the republicans try to remove Biden from ballots like the democrats did for Trump? Did the republicans endlessly try to remove Biden from office and make up court cases to try him on? Actions do lead to opposite reactions; again, not that that absolves said reactions but it definitely has a hand in them.
Hate the sin, not the sinner, eh.Well look at that, I was right, it was a conservative who shot Kirk. MAGA world went from "death penalty" to "thoughts and prayers" real quick there.
View attachment 13819