NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Covarr said:
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Funny. When this happens to Sony, everyone on here says Sony is such shit and they'll never use a Sony product again.
When it happens to Steam, you make TF2 jokes and pretend like its different. Bottom line is both companies had an obligation to protect user info and failed miserably at it.
Just saying.
Except Valve didn't store passwords in plaintext. Sony did. Valve didn't spend weeks lying to us. Sony did. Those two things alone make a HUGE difference.
P.S. Thanks
I seem to miss when Sony lied. I know they withheld all the details so that they could assess the damage properly, and not have the internet community freaking out.
Also, information was stolen both times. That's the important fact.
No, it's not. Saying information was stolen both times, and that's the important fact, is like saying during WWII the US killed hundreds of thousands of people, and that's the important fact. It's missing a huge amount of context and completely distorts the message.
We can assume that any place that hackers want to break into will get hacked at some point. What differentiates the responsible corporations from the irresponsible is what they do to prepare for this. Sony stored sensitive information in unencrypted plaintext databases. Valve stored passwords and credit card numbers in an encrypted form. This is roughly equivalent to having two banks, one of which (the Sony bank) stores money in cardboard boxes in an unlocked walk-in closet with a big sign on the door saying "MONEY". The Valve bank, on the other hand, stores it's money in a locked vault. If these were actual banks, the Sony Bank would clearly be neglectful.
Context. It makes a lot of difference.