GamerGate's Image Problem

Recommended Videos

Quadocky

New member
Aug 30, 2012
383
0
0
entelechy said:
Louzerman102 said:
I'm sorry I guess I was not clear enough. Vivian James did not exist before August 22 2014 iirc. She was not talked about before because TFYC had not launched their fundraiser before this shitstorm started August 18 2014. It's kinda hard to create a character because your donations hit that reward tier when the fundraiser does not exist.

Again:
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/vivian-james
Wait, hold the phone. Did I just read that the color of Vivian James' clothes are a reference to a rape joke?

I don't even . . .

So, it turns out there is something that gamergate could do to improve its image without a name change or denouncing the sexists in their ranks. They could stop using this mascot, for one.
Would you mind posting the info about that? This I gotta see.
 

Dragon Rage

New member
Aug 25, 2014
3
0
0
entelechy said:
Wait, hold the phone. Did I just read that the color of Vivian James' clothes are a reference to a rape joke?
Specifically they're a reference to a 4chan meme wherein Piccolo, a character from Dragon Ball Z, has anal sex with Vegeta, another character from Dragon Ball Z.

So not only is this an act between two men, but it's between two men in a show wherein the character receiving sex is actually an order of magnitude more powerful than the one giving it. By the show's own logic, it would be impossible for Piccolo to subdue Vegeta.

/explaining the joke
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Quadocky said:
entelechy said:
Louzerman102 said:
I'm sorry I guess I was not clear enough. Vivian James did not exist before August 22 2014 iirc. She was not talked about before because TFYC had not launched their fundraiser before this shitstorm started August 18 2014. It's kinda hard to create a character because your donations hit that reward tier when the fundraiser does not exist.

Again:
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/vivian-james
Wait, hold the phone. Did I just read that the color of Vivian James' clothes are a reference to a rape joke?

I don't even . . .

So, it turns out there is something that gamergate could do to improve its image without a name change or denouncing the sexists in their ranks. They could stop using this mascot, for one.
Would you mind posting the info about that? This I gotta see.
It is a reference to gay DBZ anime sex, if memory serves. Also, last I checked, Vivian was a mascot made for TFYC and represents the movement in so far as being created out of protest.
 

generals3

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,197
0
0
AkaDad said:
She puts out a video asking if games are sexist and doesn't even answer the fucking question. Strawmen, cherry-picking, and name-calling aren't facts.

She's a propagandist and a bunch of people fell for it.
Actually she did address it somewhat. She for instance said: since the vast majority of gamers playing these games are men and men tend to like sexy women and play as men it's normal the games feature sexy women and male protagonists. And she also added there are plenty of games which show women differently.

And all the other points she addressed weren't strawmen, these were all arguments actually used.

The only thing that she did wrong was making it so short which means the "analysis" couldn't be anything more than very shallow.

But there is one thing that she brought up and that I think those pseudo armchair socio-psychologists need to do; go on the field and talk to gamers. Let's not forget that when you play a game, like let's say CoD, you may always have a troll or idiot but you also have 30-40 other players who say nothing in the chat or do nothing wrong. Yet the modern trend seems to be to totally ignore that vast majority and act as if that tiny minority represents "gamers". What the hell? Might as well pretend ISIS represents all muslims.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
BobDobolina said:
It's a fair question. Why am I trying to get anyone to leave the "movement"? Frankly I don't believe there is a "movement." I believe there's a hashtag that's been thoroughly implicated in some pretty low, sorry, and even criminal shit -- whatever the sins of Zoe Quinn or gaming journalism may or may not be -- and given that that it is simply a brand that cannot be rescued, period. Associating yourself with it can only tank your credibility. Whether or not that's fair, I simply think it's the truth.

I also think you've come to an incredibly sorry pass if Milo on Breitbart is the last significant ally you can dredge up -- given his demonstrated attitude toward gamers in general and that site's journalistic standing if you genuinely want to engage in a campaign for journalistic ethics -- and it kind of beggars belief that so many of you can't see it. Ultimately I don't dismiss the #GamerGaters as evil or subhuman or terrorists, but that kind of thing is proof positive to me of how utterly wrong-headed and futile the whole exercise is.
I made a reply and it was eaten...
Time for take two.

I disagree that the movement is permenantly tainted. To make that claim would be to claim that all christians are permanently tainted as baby-murderers, wife beaters or worse described in the bible itself. Or to make a generalization that all liberals are like Alex Jones or all conservatives are like Glenn beck. It is the mindset of the lazy or the dishonest to cling to that sort of thinking and I don't think they were going to be able to have their minds changed regardless what we do, so I don't think that particular subset was what the thread was abound.

as for Milo and the rest, you seem very determined to try to attack their credibility but I honestly fail to see why. They are a conservative rag with some crazy ideas, I know that much, but so what? So far the extent of your reasoning is "I don't like them" which is noted but not really worth something. Right now they are one of the few sites willing to cover the story and invest actual investigation into it. Furthermore, the gamergate thing seems to pride itself on diversity considering how many of its members used the #notyourshield tag to try to stop journalists from dismissing their identity. The movement, (regardless if you dislike the term, it is a concentrated effort towards a general goal by a good chunk of people) is made of a lot of different types of people, so I would be hesitant to try to distance myself from a political ideology simply for a "I dislike them and they hurt your credibility for it" claim. When picking between having no media representation and having less then ideal, I would at least have the less then ideal unless there was something genuinely disconcerting about it. Being a conservatively slanted news site is not enough for that warning to go on I think.
 

entelechy

New member
Sep 1, 2010
168
0
0
Dragon Rage said:
entelechy said:
Wait, hold the phone. Did I just read that the color of Vivian James' clothes are a reference to a rape joke?
Specifically they're a reference to a 4chan meme wherein Piccolo, a character from Dragon Ball Z, has anal sex with Vegeta, another character from Dragon Ball Z.

So not only is this an act between two men, but it's between two men in a show wherein the character receiving sex is actually an order of magnitude more powerful than the one giving it. By the show's own logic, it would be impossible for Piccolo to subdue Vegeta.

/explaining the joke
I suppose it's possible that knowyourmeme is in error, but they do describe it [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/piccolo-dick] as "Piccolo anally raping Vegeta."
 

Kimozabi

New member
Sep 1, 2008
30
0
0
Kellee Santiago invests in Polytron and stands to gain financially from the sales of Fez in its first year.
In 2011, Kellee Santiago becomes the Jury chair of IndieCade 2011.
The Jury chair works closely together with every juror when they vote for winners.
In 2011, Fez wins 2 IndieCade awards, 1 of the being the biggest of them all.

The Jury chair's investment in Fez is disclosed to absolutely nobody

Anybody knowing about this and still claiming that everything is about Zoe Quinn is directly contributing to the image problem.
Just putting that out there.
If you are against the movement and you yourself are unwilling to move past Zoe Quinn, you're one of the reasons why it has such a bad name.
 

Dragon Rage

New member
Aug 25, 2014
3
0
0
entelechy said:
I suppose it's possible that knowyourmeme is in error, but they do describe it [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/piccolo-dick] as "Piccolo anally raping Vegeta."
It could be interpreted either way, really. I believe that the consensual sex angle makes more sense given the characters, but that's just me.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
entelechy said:
Dragon Rage said:
entelechy said:
Wait, hold the phone. Did I just read that the color of Vivian James' clothes are a reference to a rape joke?
Specifically they're a reference to a 4chan meme wherein Piccolo, a character from Dragon Ball Z, has anal sex with Vegeta, another character from Dragon Ball Z.

So not only is this an act between two men, but it's between two men in a show wherein the character receiving sex is actually an order of magnitude more powerful than the one giving it. By the show's own logic, it would be impossible for Piccolo to subdue Vegeta.

/explaining the joke
I suppose it's possible that knowyourmeme is in error, but they do describe it [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/piccolo-dick] as "Piccolo anally raping Vegeta."
I thought it was some very poorly rendered porn video made gif. If that is the case though, perhaps they use the word "rape" as liberally as the porn industry does in describing videos? How many porn titles have the word "rape" in the title or description and use that to describe rough sex as opposed to non-consensual sex?

I'll be honest on this one, I don't know.
 

Nikolaz72

This place still alive?
Apr 23, 2009
2,123
0
0
generals3 said:
Might as well pretend ISIS represents all muslims.
Many do, many do.

-----------------------------------

It's my main problem with those that dismiss the entire movement due to a fringe conservative mysoginists, the vast majority of us are just regular gamers, and out of all the issues in the movement none of them has anything to do with people being conservative, socialist or liberalists. Every ideology can more or less agree on these various issues, corruption is always bad. It doesn't matter whether you're leftwing or rightwing.

The unfortunate fact is that all that journalists on various mainstream sites are afraid from speaking out due to the repercussions such as being blacklisted or fired (A Journalist from Kotaku admitted to that) means conservative talkpieces that are traditionally against those traditionally liberalistic sites will end up being the only platforms available from which to critisize them.

Once the movement gets properly going, more journalists gets fired for slipups, more of them will speak out about the corruption in the industry. The Breitbart journalist has yet to reveal the email discussions on 'Death to All Gamers' and 'Censorship'. It will be interesting to see what happens when he does, and I hope the insider-source doesn't loose her career over this.

We will overcome the stigma, the corrupt games media will pay for their mistake.. Literally, as people and ad-revenue abandon their sites. In favour of non conspiratory-non corrupt websites like http://www.escapistmagazine.com. Seriously guys, visit that site, give them attention, they deserve it!
 

Velventian

Left here for the world to see
May 17, 2013
164
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Been a gamer for 23+ years. At the end of the day, this entire thing started because a woman had sex with someone, and people got angry. In my mind, that's always going to be what I associate Gamer Gate with, and all the negative connotations that comes with it (as well as the stupid name, Gamer Gate? Seriously? It's fucking video games for christ's sake).

A gross simplification perhaps? Maybe, but I find a movement is only worth as much as what sparked it in the first place, and anything that uses the term SJW unironically isn't something I want to associate with, or be associated with.
The American revolution was basically sparked by a bunch of people throwing tea into the harbor... What sparks a movement and the movement itself are in many cases 2 very different things
 

Velventian

Left here for the world to see
May 17, 2013
164
0
0
JoJo said:
As a neutral observer, one thing that might help is avoiding mentioning Anita Sarkeesian in the context of GamerGame. I've seen her name crop up quite a bit when browsing the super GamerGate thread (old or new), she's even appeared in the banners some people have made, and yet as far as I can see she has nothing to do with this other than being another feminist a lot of people here don't like. Regardless of people's intentions, it does give the impression that they have an axe to grind over feminism rather than journalistic integrity.
There was an article about it somewhere, sure we may keep talking about her but its the other side that keeps dragging her into the spotlight. Just look what happened with @neros atricle.
Action: Article about secret email group between devs (no mention of anita)
Reaction: Kotaku Article "ANITA RECEIVED BOMB THREAT 6 MONTHS AGO"

When ever they run out of answers they pull up anita or zq as a shield to deflect any attacks.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
BobDobolina said:
runic knight said:
I disagree that the movement is permenantly tainted. To make that claim would be to claim that all christians are permanently tainted as baby-murderers, wife beaters or worse described in the bible itself.
Being the dupe of a pissed-off ex, which effectively was the genesis point for GG, does not make you the equivalent of the early Christians, sorry. And insisting that You're Not Like the Few Bad Apples in a context where the "movement" you're supporting has thoroughly implicated itself in deceit and harasment just doesn't work. It's like trying to join the KKK and claiming you were just there because you admire the aesthetic purity and theological irony of a burning cross. Expecting people to believe you is just unrealistic at a certain point, and you all were at that point weeks ago.

as for Milo and the rest, you seem very determined to try to attack their credibility but I honestly fail to see why. They are a conservative rag with some crazy ideas, I know that much, but so what?
They're not "a conservative rag with some crazy ideas." They're a conservative rag with literally less journalistic credibility than Faux News or The Drudge Report. If you can't see the relevance of that to staking your hopes on their output to your campaign for ethics in journalism, there's nothing more I can do to help you. It's basically like declaring a crusade against pedophilia and then allying yourself with NAMBLA because one of their newsletters has some content that seems momentarily useful.
My point was something that Velventian put far more eloquently, what sparked an event does not have to forever define it. also I find it interesting you say "being the dupe of" someone who;s claims have been verified on at least two accounts and not disproven on any of the rest.

The KKK has a defined goal of racial purity or some such nonsense but that goal there? That is what people are against in the KKK. Gamergate is being called something that is not its actual goal and this people are against an aspect thatdoesn't define the movement like hatred and racism actually defines the KKK, there is a difference there. Gamergate's goal is against journalistic corruption, and is being written off by people, such as yourself, for being for harassment when it is not.

As for milo, you mentioned you dislike him, you keep mentioning it, but you never actually back it up beyond your assertions that it is bad. You'll forgive me if between that and your insistence that I am "too far gone" that I largely dismiss your concerns on that part from here on.
 

Nikolaz72

This place still alive?
Apr 23, 2009
2,123
0
0
BobDobolina said:
runic knight said:
My point was something that Velventian put far more eloquently, what sparked an event does not have to forever define it.
Strictly speaking true; but it will be far more compelling if you ever reach the point where half of the so-called "movement" isn't still publicly and graphically obsessing about what an evil slut Zoe Quinn supposedly is. I personally suspect events will outrun your ever getting there.
To be honest, just look at the main thread. You'll be hard pressed to find 800 Posts about Zoe Quinn, let alone 800 posts of people 'obsessing graphically' over her, which you'd have to should you want your argument to hold water.

It's about journalistic integrity, currently it's people patting Greg Tito on the back for not censoring discussion, aswell as anticipation for the release of more of the discussion the secret email group (Once its been edited to censor personal information)

The times it becomes about Zoe Quinn is when some people ( I wont name names) comes into the thread to defend Sarkeesian/Zoe Quinn from imagined attacks. Last time they were mentioned was when the first round of emails were released and Kotaku released an article of a half year old bombthreat against a convention that Sarkeesian attended to 'again' steer discussion onto Anita and ZQ and away from them.

Kotaku and their ilk are afraid of the consequences tied to their lack of journalistic integrity, so when people want to target them they take cover behind the likes of Sarkeesian to deflect any legitimate complaints and concerns.
 

generals3

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,197
0
0
Nikolaz72 said:
To be honest, just look at the main thread. You'll be hard pressed to find 800 Posts about Zoe Quinn, let alone 800 posts of people 'obsessing graphically' over her, which you'd have to should you want your argument to hold water.

It's about journalistic integrity, currently it's people patting Greg Tito on the back for not censoring discussion, aswell as anticipation for the release of more of the discussion the secret email group (Once its been edited to censor personal information)

The times it becomes about Zoe Quinn is when some people ( I wont name names) comes into the thread to defend Sarkeesian/Zoe Quinn from imagined attacks. Last time they were mentioned was when the first round of emails were released and Kotaku released an article of a 6year old bombthreat against Sarkeesian to 'again' steer discussion onto Anita and ZQ and away from them.

Kotaku and their ilk are afraid of the consequences tied to their lack of journalistic integrity, so when people want to target them they take cover behind the likes of Sarkeesian to deflect any legitimate complaints and concerns.
Let's also not forget there is some kind of self-fulfilling prophecy going on. Those who claim the majority is about Zoe/Anita have a tendency to mainly comment on those aspects and put those in the spotlight. This further reinforces the image that it is truly about them.
 

MrHide-Patten

New member
Jun 10, 2009
1,306
0
0
MarsAtlas said:
MrHide-Patten said:
You can't fix whats already been pulverized into a fine dust. The KKK might have an easier time mending an image problem then Gamergate. Maybe if the inciting incident wasn't motivated and broadcast by misogynists* then yeah maybe, but at this stage, better luck next time. One can only hope for another rotting pile of shit like Kane & Lynch 2 or Aliens Colonial Marines.

*Not everybody who is involved with Gamer-gate and such is a Misogynist, but some of the loudest fuck-knuckles most likely were. I have now lost 15% more faith in humanity form having to clarify this.
Footnotes[footnote]Like this![/footnote] baby[footnote]Sexy baby, not actual baby.[/footnote], footnotes[footnote]I'll show you how![/footnote]

Like how you do brackets of "img" for an image or "spoiler" for a spoiler, you just use "footnote" with an open bracket and a close bracket, with the text you want as a footnote inside of the brackets. I'll footnote your post to show:

You can't fix whats already been pulverized into a fine dust. The KKK might have an easier time mending an image problem then Gamergate. Maybe if the inciting incident wasn't motivated and broadcast by misogynists[footnote]Not everybody who is involved with Gamer-gate and such is a Misogynist, but some of the loudest fuck-knuckles most likely were. I have now lost 15% more faith in humanity form having to clarify this.[/footnote] then yeah maybe, but at this stage, better luck next time. One can only hope for another rotting pile of shit like Kane & Lynch 2 or Aliens Colonial Marines.
The more ya know. Looks much more... 'flashy'.
 

irishda

New member
Dec 16, 2010
968
0
0
Zontar said:
Daystar Clarion said:
Been a gamer for 23+ years. At the end of the day, this entire thing started because a woman had sex with someone, and people got angry. In my mind, that's always going to be what I associate Gamer Gate with, and all the negative connotations that comes with it (as well as the stupid name, Gamer Gate? Seriously? It's fucking video games for christ's sake).

A gross simplification perhaps? Maybe, but I find a movement is only worth as much as what sparked it in the first place, and anything that uses the term SJW unironically isn't something I want to associate with, or be associated with.
Your comment just reinforces the fact that GamerGate has an image problem. After all, you skipped the part where every video game website bar the Escapist tried to censor anyone talking about Quinn, as well as Reddit and, somehow, 4chan. That is the crucial missing part between "her sleeping with people" and "people getting angry", and rightly so.
Of course, could the "censoring" be the standard deletion one sees whenever a group of angry gamers start talking about a woman who makes them mad? No, it's probably far safer to assume she frequently has sex with mods and editors and janitors and writers and advertisers, etc., etc. And that this horde of people aren't professional enough to separate their work and sex lives, so they've all been tamed by her magic vagina.

I have no idea why the movement has an image problem.
 

irishda

New member
Dec 16, 2010
968
0
0
Velventian said:
irishda said:
Velventian said:
There was an article about it somewhere, sure we may keep talking about her but its the other side that keeps dragging her into the spotlight.
sure we may keep talking about her but its the other side that keeps dragging her into the spotlight
I'm not even going to comment. I'm just going to leave this here for the world to see.
Do all of your trousers come in smarty pants edition or do you have to turn them inside out every 2 weeks to avoid the smell?
Sure I may keep talking about you, but it's you who are dragging yourself into the spotlight.
 

Velventian

Left here for the world to see
May 17, 2013
164
0
0
irishda said:
Velventian said:
irishda said:
Velventian said:
There was an article about it somewhere, sure we may keep talking about her but its the other side that keeps dragging her into the spotlight.
sure we may keep talking about her but its the other side that keeps dragging her into the spotlight
I'm not even going to comment. I'm just going to leave this here for the world to see.
Do all of your trousers come in smarty pants edition or do you have to turn them inside out every 2 weeks to avoid the smell?
Sure I may keep talking about you, but it's you who are dragging yourself into the spotlight.

How to drag oneself for dummies

(yeah i know that post might earn me a warning but in that case its worth it...)
 

Jux

Hmm
Sep 2, 2012
867
4
23
Nikolaz72 said:
BobDobolina said:
runic knight said:
My point was something that Velventian put far more eloquently, what sparked an event does not have to forever define it.
Strictly speaking true; but it will be far more compelling if you ever reach the point where half of the so-called "movement" isn't still publicly and graphically obsessing about what an evil slut Zoe Quinn supposedly is. I personally suspect events will outrun your ever getting there.
To be honest, just look at the main thread. You'll be hard pressed to find 800 Posts about Zoe Quinn, let alone 800 posts of people 'obsessing graphically' over her, which you'd have to should you want your argument to hold water.
A couple of things I want to point out Nik. First off, there is probably a good deal of the movement that isn't posting on the Escapist. Second, the rules were laid down in that thread that talking about Quinn's personal life was not going to be acceptable at the Escapist. Pointing out that people weren't making this about Quinn here specifically doesn't really mean much when it was explicitly said that they couldn't talk about her private life.