Praetox said:
Another vote for Duke Nukem Forever. Just bought it and really enjoying myself
I've actually been thinking of maybe trying that out. I mean, it looks like it's actually fun. Sure, buggy and all. But it looks fun. I see a lot of people hate it because certain aspects make it feel like a game from 2001 (yet, people like
Serious Sam a lot and got all hyped about a port of
Halo), while other aspects feel more modern. This actually interests me. The only thing holding me back is the content. I can deal with
Serious Sam,
Halo,
Left 4 Dead, whatever. But, the stuff in
Duke Nukem Forever seems a bit much for me. I've heard
Duke Nukem 3-D had a content filter, and even got a censored version called "Duke Nukem 64". However, I have just never been able to confirm if
Duke Nukem Forever has a content filter or not. Can anyone here tell me if it does or not?
Palmerama said:
Also Goldeneye: Rogue Agent! I thought the controls were tight & responsive, with challenging gameplay & a fairly decent story!
I've been thinking about looking into this one as well. I've been rather intrigued by Electronic Arts' take on the
007 videogames.
gigastrike said:
Super Mario: Sunshine. The worlds were great and I had a blast with the FLUDD. I honestly can't see why the fans don't like it.
Maybe it's because it isn't violent? (I wouldn't know for sure, but the ESRB content box only mentioned "Comic Mischief".) It's structured differently, Mario has this gimmicky tool the whole time, there's a darker plot reminiscent of
Sonic Adventure 2 in numerous ways, there's a lot more dialogue, there's a near-death scene, it's got an all-island theme... But, I'd like to try it as well! I often find myself liking things that are strange or unpopular.
I'd like to try
Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts and finally come to a true conclusion.
It looks like fun in it's own regard. Just different (
VERY different) from the classic titles.