Hmmm, well I can see both sides of this equasion.
In general despite his profession giving him alleged expertise, he didn't seem to be making any comments on behalf of the company. What's more he was being honest, and the information he relayed about torrents and such is general knowlege at least within the gaming community since game companies complaining about piracy themselves mention torrents and the like (Pirate's Bay, etc...). The point being that anyone who wants to pirate could just search for a torrent and find sites like that which are contreversial for a reason. You don't have to be a pirate to know this since at least within the game community people have more or less been screaming it from the rooftops whether they agree or disagree with piracy.
I tend to think that if he was fired for this it was wrong, free speech and all that, since he was not speaking FOR the company, or attempting to slander them. If he had a union behind him or whatever, chances are it wouldn't have happened (at least not for this).
I can see things from the company's perspective though, and not wanting to encourage their people to speak to the media so they can control as much information as possible, especially if people are calling them "experts". After all Gamestop could in theory charge money to send a rep to the media to provide expert testimony... IF people are willing to accept Gamestop as an expert source (which apparently at least someone in the media is). A point I think is not being considered.
Also I suppose simply having an employee associated with a rape game might panic their PR people.
In general despite his profession giving him alleged expertise, he didn't seem to be making any comments on behalf of the company. What's more he was being honest, and the information he relayed about torrents and such is general knowlege at least within the gaming community since game companies complaining about piracy themselves mention torrents and the like (Pirate's Bay, etc...). The point being that anyone who wants to pirate could just search for a torrent and find sites like that which are contreversial for a reason. You don't have to be a pirate to know this since at least within the game community people have more or less been screaming it from the rooftops whether they agree or disagree with piracy.
I tend to think that if he was fired for this it was wrong, free speech and all that, since he was not speaking FOR the company, or attempting to slander them. If he had a union behind him or whatever, chances are it wouldn't have happened (at least not for this).
I can see things from the company's perspective though, and not wanting to encourage their people to speak to the media so they can control as much information as possible, especially if people are calling them "experts". After all Gamestop could in theory charge money to send a rep to the media to provide expert testimony... IF people are willing to accept Gamestop as an expert source (which apparently at least someone in the media is). A point I think is not being considered.
Also I suppose simply having an employee associated with a rape game might panic their PR people.