Gaming crossovers; which would you propose?
- Thread starter Saladfork
- Start date
Recommended Videos
That would be nice if they did the stealth elements well. Along with planning out the assassinations as well.Keoul said:
Now that would be awesome to see xDFreezy_Breezy said:
My two cents though: Mass Effect X EVE Online
RPG Action Shooter + Massive fleet combat with your mates. Kinda in the same vein as EVE Online and Dust are planning to become.
SureKorten12 said:
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/8126014/1/
Take note that it's a work in progress though.
Starcraft meets Gears of War.
Now I know what you're saying "hurrr durr Gears? What is this kid like 12? This is fer realz games" but listen.
Gears of War, despite being the go-to third person shooter for the "bro-gamer" demographic is actually really well made and a LOT more in depth than 90% of third person shooters out there. The combat is great, the guns are fun, the enemy variety is LEAGUES AHEAD of most games out there. I guess you could say Battlefront instead of Gears, but only for the scale, because Battlefront is very floaty in its combat.
Replace boring space marines with Terran and locust with Zerg and then add Protoss for good measure and BAM I just made the best thing ever. Also you would need vehicles, can't go without those. Throw in a map editor for replay value.
edit: not so much a crossover, just a crossover in genre. But still, Starcraft could do well in plenty of other genres, I really don't know why Blizz doesn't get on the potential they have.
Now I know what you're saying "hurrr durr Gears? What is this kid like 12? This is fer realz games" but listen.
Gears of War, despite being the go-to third person shooter for the "bro-gamer" demographic is actually really well made and a LOT more in depth than 90% of third person shooters out there. The combat is great, the guns are fun, the enemy variety is LEAGUES AHEAD of most games out there. I guess you could say Battlefront instead of Gears, but only for the scale, because Battlefront is very floaty in its combat.
Replace boring space marines with Terran and locust with Zerg and then add Protoss for good measure and BAM I just made the best thing ever. Also you would need vehicles, can't go without those. Throw in a map editor for replay value.
edit: not so much a crossover, just a crossover in genre. But still, Starcraft could do well in plenty of other genres, I really don't know why Blizz doesn't get on the potential they have.
yeah they could but not in an assassins creed themed game. That tower defense was terrible! maybe if it was more like Orcs Must Die then It would be good but not Revelations stylerhizhim said:
What makes Hitoshura, the Protagonist from SMT: Nocturne, a threat to the 40K cosmos? The fact that his nature has elevated him to a position on the cosmic food chain that defines him as a predator of deities, and leader of an army consisting of just about any and all creatures ever, Angels, Demons, Gods, You name it, he's probably been to a reality and recruited it or beat it down to cosmic dust and then resurrected it and drafted it into his army. He killed the concept and embodiment of Multiversal reincarnation because he could.Jynthor said:
The Embryon, the main protagonists from the DDS duo of games, aren't on the same level, but can each become gods unto themselves in terms of power. While they wouldn't pose a threat to the gods of the 40K setting like Hito would, they could each singlehandedly floor the mortal armies, as well as Demon and Daemon armies of 40k universe, not to mention the 'Boss' Creatures that required them to work together after having achieved these levels of power to defeat.
Please don't misunderstand, I'm well aware of how potent the beings of the 40k Setting are. But looking at the two realities, at peak conditions, and then viewed objectively, I have to tip my hand towards Hito and the Embryon, The Other Protagonists of the SMT series I have little first hand experience with however, and can only vouche for their power letting them hold their own against far more than something from the 40k world would allow in a 1 vs Many scenario. Again, at peak of their power. Anything less and they would be floored.
You may want to note that Capcom origionally didn't intend for that at all. Shortly after MvC3 came out that Disaster hit japan, and Capcom halted it's DLC plans for MvC3SweetShark said:When the MvC3 came out, after few months Capcom announced this:Diablo1099 said:
I did the math though before I decided to get it. I checked the DLC prices of Jill and Shumagorath, counted how many new characters I was getting, along with a further refined combat system? I spent less money buying MVC3 ultimate than I would've if they had released all the DLC characters as Actual DLC. Instead they bundled it all up at a discount to what they could make for quick money to try and build up releif funds. They're now making their profit off of skin/Costume DLC instead of Character DLC as far as that game is concerned.
Dark Souls x Prince of Persia
Devil May Cry x Prince of Persia x God of War
Bayonetta x Bullet Witch
Devil May Cry x Prince of Persia x God of War
Bayonetta x Bullet Witch
Mount & Blade: Warband meets Crusader Kings.
The map, lords and fighting of Mount & Blade meets the intrigue and dastardlyness of the Crusader King characters plus the random events. It would be the ultimate game, repackaged with that combo it could even be a good ASOIAF game.
The map, lords and fighting of Mount & Blade meets the intrigue and dastardlyness of the Crusader King characters plus the random events. It would be the ultimate game, repackaged with that combo it could even be a good ASOIAF game.