Just for clarity. Just to make sure. Did you or did you not like 'femdom fan wank'?Well apparently they're not that big an audience.
Future answer = is just not watching.
Just for clarity. Just to make sure. Did you or did you not like 'femdom fan wank'?Well apparently they're not that big an audience.
Future answer = is just not watching.
Firstly: calling Batwoman a "major property" is like thinking Alan Scott is a major Green Lantern character
Secondly: your numbers for Stargirl are just wrong. The Batwoman numbers don't include the DVR recordings. And due to Covid, Batwoman's season got unexpectedly cut short, dropping the last two episodes
View attachment 1523
In short: if Batwoman's Going Broke after Going Woke, so's Stargirl.
Not that it matters. It'll get memory-holed as soon as it doesn't fit the narrative
Not a fan thanks.Just for clarity. Just to make sure. Did you or did you not like 'femdom fan wank'?
So why did we do this:Not a fan thanks.
You dont like woke/famdom fan wank. Why were you disagreeing with me that you dont like it here? You want your females to act a certain way or say the right things. You dont want them to be woke. Why are you disagreeing with me when you clearly think that?Trunkage said:
I’m pretty sure I said something like: women need to be leads only when they do it the way you like. They need to appease your sensibilities. Anything outside what you like is woke
Dwarvenhobble said;
Which I already debunked, you already made this claim and I pointed out how you seemingly Missed it. So did you miss it again? Or are you trying the same trite old narrative a 3rd time?
Yeah, how dare oppressed populations cheer on people who are trying to help them! Pay your fucking taxes, freeloaders!!yehs and I'm saying they managed to push the themes to a more extreme degree more the people demanding change than Robin trying to help them and being seen as fighting on their behalf.
Anything not done in service to the hobby hurts the hobby.Look, guys. Gotta ask.
You know that being Anti-Woke is a Free Speech issue right? You want movies using the right words. Right? That you want to take away the ability for people to say and do what they want. Right? Even if its this evil woke stuff
Being Anti-Woke is the Rights version of Cancel Culture. All about demanding business to make the products they like. Using social media to crack down on business and tanking review scores. Right?
You guys keep alluding to motives, pretending what the other side thinks. Does this make it clearer?
God, fuck off.Anything not done in service to the hobby hurts the hobby.
Anything not done in service to the hobby hurts the hobby.
Do you think stuffing a game full of microtransactions is "the creatives making the art they want to make"? Why or why not?Why can't you just let creatives make the art they want to make
No, that's capitalists coming in and fucking with the vision of the actual artists like they've always done since the dawn of time.Do you think stuffing a game full of microtransactions is "the creatives making the art they want to make"? Why or why not?
That's ma'am to you.( I don't think he'll answer this question )
1)Oh, but we do, actually. See, every time Wikipedia asserts a fact, it puts a little blue number next to it. That's called a "hyperlink" and clicking on it sends you to where Wikipedia got that information. This is where they got Batwoman's numbers: http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articl...cable-originals-network-finals-5-17-2020.html1) We don't actually know if Batwoman's overall ratings include DVR or not some do.
2) Batwoman is still connected to Batman ad a property, Batman is presently a bigger property than Superman for DC. Batwoman is fairly high up there she may not be A tier Justice League mainstay level but she's at least Green Arrow tier which Stargirl really isn't in terms of renown.
3) Even without DVR numbers Stargirl was still ahead of Batwoman by the season finale lol.
Yes, exactly. That's exactly what I'm against.No, that's capitalists coming in and fucking with the vision of the actual artists like they've always done since the dawn of time...
Or all the queer representation in media nowadays (as long as it's vague and meaningless enough to be edited out of the film so we can sell in the countries that still stone the gays.)
MadamWhy is there an apostrophe in "Ma'am"? Is it short for something?
Oh, that makes sense. Thank you, I learned something new today.Madam
1) No that only states some of the numbers1)Oh, but we do, actually. See, every time Wikipedia asserts a fact, it puts a little blue number next to it. That's called a "hyperlink" and clicking on it sends you to where Wikipedia got that information. This is where they got Batwoman's numbers: http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articl...cable-originals-network-finals-5-17-2020.html
2) lol, no. Batgirl, maybe, but not Batwoman. Green Arrow was on Justice League Unlimited at least, and Stargirl had an episode on the same show. Only thing Batwoman had going for her was Bat in the name
3) Slightly. the power of getting a full season instead of getting truncated by plague
Because no acting in 1 particular way is a pretty different set of desire to "Act only in a certain way".So why did we do this:
You dont like woke/femdom fan wank. Why were you disagreeing with me that you dont like it here? You want your females to act a certain way or say the right things. You dont want them to be woke. Why are you disagreeing with me when you clearly think that?
It's funny I was actually already ahead of this one and gave you an answer before you asked because I predicted this is where you'd go. I'd hoped you'd at least be somewhat original and not use the same playbook I've seen used so oftenLook, guys. Gotta ask.
You know that being Anti-Woke is a Free Speech issue right? You want movies using the right words. Right? That you want to take away the ability for people to say and do what they want. Right? Even if its this evil woke stuff
Being Anti-Woke is the Rights version of Cancel Culture. All about demanding business to make the products they like. Using social media to crack down on business and tanking review scores. Right?
You guys keep alluding to motives, pretending what the other side thinks. Does this make it clearer?
So tell me who is stopping these shows?Well apparently they're not that big an audience.
Future answer = is just not watching
Are you summoning me? here's an answer I prepared earlier #690Do you think stuffing a game full of microtransactions is "the creatives making the art they want to make"? Why or why not?
( I don't think he'll answer this question )
How pro-corporate interference am I?Iron: As was said before... good authors don't get promoted because of wokeness. They're being asked to pay a pound of flesh at the gates. That is why the only good comics nowadays are not of the major publishers or are self-published, and why the comic book industry (especially the stores) are failing. The products are garbage. They thought they were connecting with younger audiences but it didn't sell.
I don't care about the general offense people take when it's mentioned, I find it tiresome.
Trunkage: Artist dont make 'woke' thing. They just make. We apply the woke label later when we want to make it political
Edit: This is different from a studio note saying 'we need this in our movie." Because I don't agree with that, whether its conservative, progressive or libertarian. This includes all those studio notes from the 1930s to today who say "Only white males can make this movie work. Females cant do that. Black people need to die first. etc." Studio fucking with artistic visions is (usually) bad
more trying to have peasants be more the protesting and rioting by the sounds of things lolYeah, how dare oppressed populations cheer on people who are trying to help them! Pay your fucking taxes, freeloaders!!
Weird that because pointing out again that certain elements have seen so called "progressives" calling for "Moral restrictions"God, fuck off.
Why can't you just let creatives make the art they want to make without bitching about it 24/7?
You conservatives are such god damn snowflakes.
It really depends. Are you trying to ban pecan crunch ice cream? Or are you just leaving it alone to do its own thing? Because right now, you're analogy doesn't make sense. For this analogy to match what you're doing, you would be stating that pecan crunch is ruining the rest of ice cream and we need to get rid of it.Because no acting in 1 particular way is a pretty different set of desire to "Act only in a certain way".
Saying I don't like pecan crunch icecream vs saying I only like ice cream a certain way is highly misleading at best, at worst a disingenuous move to try and cast aspersions. (Not that you haven't been trying to do that already).
No, I had directed that question at FennekoAre you summoning me?