The only thing I'm upset about is that I have to re-post my other post from the double-thread.
OT: I'm not for gays/lesbians/bisexuals, just as I am not for heterosexuals/asexuals/demisexuals, so I assume you mean, that I harbour them no ill-will and do not discriminate or think less of them for their sexual orientation, in which case, you are correct, I do not place heterosexuals/homosexuals/bisexuals/asexual/etc on different levels, I consider them equal.
The reason why?
1. What harm does homosexuality/bisexuality/you-get-the-picture cause?
2. Where is the evidence that people are directly responsible for their own sexual orientation?
... yeah that's pretty much it, it doesn't hurt anyone, it isn't counter-productive or detrimental to anybody or anything, and while that in itself is enough, if it ever becomes (for some logic-defying reason) harmful to others then how is that the fault of the *insert sexuality here* individual? So people, no matter their sexuality, cause no harm as an intrinsic quality of their sexuality, nor do they appear to have a level of control over their orientation, so there is neither cause (a.k.a. choice of lifestyle, whether hetero-, homo-, other-) or effect (negative repercussions to sexual orientation), so therefore there is no crime, sin, or harm, and no intention to cause any, so their is neither victim nor culprit and therefore nothing wrong in any way, shape or form.