Dynast Brass said:
Loonyyy said:
Dynast Brass said:
The other irony here is that GG doesn't really seem to target big companies like Gearbox anyway. You hear orders of magnitude more every day about "Wu" or "Quinn" than you've heard in the lifetime of GG about Gearbox.
Could you not? I mean seriously, could you GGers not do this? It's an incredibly annoying derail, meant to start more petty bullshit. In fact, several of the people involved in various slap fights are in this very thread, condemning Pitchford. Hell, I don't think I've read a single post in support of him(Ok, maybe one, and it didn't mention GG). So could you please not?
I always find it's very helpful to read the posts I'm replying to; it helps me avoid mistakes like you just made, thinking I'm a "GG'er" when I'm not.
I did actually. You're talking about this GG shite. So I'm calling it what it is. I know you have a barely concealed contempt for Gamergate, and spend most of your time posting with GG users antagonistically. And that's just as much part of the problem. And you brought it into an unrelated thread. You couldn't even find someone to quote to bring it in, because no-one was talking GG stuff. Except you. You brought it in, and it's unnecessary. It's pointlessly aiming to start fights and arguments. You can already see the stuff starting. What purpose does that serve? Hell, people on all manner of side of that particular, overdone debate, were posting in almost in solidarity against Pitchford's frankly moronic comments.
Thanks you for skimming what I said and then responding though,
See, speaking of mistakes.
and also for assuming the worst of me.
There are worse things than GGers. The most annoying thing about GG stuff is the GG stuff. And you just tried to bring it in. Which makes your posting indistinguishable from theirs. At best, you are the bait that lures in the GG talk. Even the users on this forum who post in support of GG (And I also am not a fan of that, for the record), kept it to the topic, and were largely critical of Pitchford (Which of course, you ignored, to target a buzzword which would create controversy and strife).
But yeah, I did call you a GGer. If the boot fits. Can't think you'd be much a fan of it, but I thought it was the best way to convey the message. Because that's what this sort of posting looks like to others. I'm not assuming anything of you. This is how you present yourself on the forum, and this is how I see it. I'm not interested in making assumptions about your positions, or your character. I'm interested in the posts, and what you did there was entirely unnecessary.