Because a dress isn't a kilt and only real men wear kilts!Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
Because a dress isn't a kilt and only real men wear kilts!Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
I've worn a skirt out clubbing. I am also a man. I was not called a pervert.Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
I think the key and lock analogy is actually used because it's hard to get a woman to sleep with you, not so with men. Men are up for almost anything with anyone.Break said:My favourite thing about that quote is that it's insulting on so many levels, you know? I mean, it doesn't just reinforce the whole "if a man likes sex, who cares, he's a man, but if a woman likes sex, she's a disgusting whore" thing - it also assumes the kind of backwards sexual and gender identity that women's rights movements have been railing against for decades. The key and lock metaphor implies that sexual pleasure, chastity, etc. is something a woman has to protect, otherwise she's failed at being a woman, while simultaneously encouraging the notion that a man's worth should be measured by the range of his sexual conquests, a concept steeped in discrimination and potentially harmful psychoses in its own right.Eukaryote said:Reposting here as it is necessary:
If a key opens many locks it is a master key, if a lock is opened by many keys it is a shitty lock.
And you don't even have to think that deeply - it basically calls promiscuous women "shitty" straight out, no pop sociology required. You rarely come across a sentence that can be so universally insulting and disgusting - it's really quite impressive.
It does...pervert.Daveman said:I've worn a skirt out clubbing. I am also a man. I was not called a pervert.Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
Or does it not count when you do it with a group of mates... or does it make it worse...
help me, social convention is my Achilles heel.
Despite agreeing completely with your point on bullshit fashion traditions (sounds like suitable material for one of your rants, if you haven't made one already) the burning question is, predictably enough, how did the situation arise that you actually discovered the comfort of panties, exactly? A bet, or simple curiousity, or to prove decisively that you don't care for marketing departments telling you what clothes you can wear..? I can only imagine that there's a story.Khell_Sennet said:I don't play by all the rules of fashion. To me, clothing is a necessary evil, but one I am not overly inclined to spend much money, time, or thought on. Comfort before all else, and my style is my own. I have a thing for black (though not exclusively), but I am no emo or goth. Brand name is nothing to me, I choose brands for fit and durability, and couldn't give two shits if it says Tommy Hilfiger or Mark's Work Wearhouse. I wear suspenders with T-Shirts, jogging pants aren't a sin to wear outdoors in my eyes, and I gladly wear a golf shirt with my woodland camo shorts. And here, in the anonymity of the internet, I will admit that under all my clothing I wear panties. Bikini cut mostly, typically plain white cotton ones, all because they are more comfortable than briefs or boxers. If wearing womens underwear makes me a pervert, I guess I must be one, but I do it because they are the only undergarments I've tried that keep me from crushing my family jewels every time I sit down. In the end, it's the same material, made by the same company, and used for the same purpose. So what if the cut is a little different?
In the UK our sports teams are so manly and sexually alluring that when we go out on "social nights" we have to dress up in such a way as to appear less attractive i.e. wearing skirts, dressed in tight lycra, pretending to be gimps etc etc. Plus it's a laugh.mesoforte said:It does...pervert.Daveman said:I've worn a skirt out clubbing. I am also a man. I was not called a pervert.Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
Or does it not count when you do it with a group of mates... or does it make it worse...
help me, social convention is my Achilles heel.
More importantly, why did a group of guys go out in a skirt clubbing?
Adrimor said:Bullshit.More men have hit women than vice versa.
Odds are very, very good that more women have hit men, because women don't automatically go to jail for it, and it is considered unmanly for a man to report being struck by women. In some places there's even hard data to back this up.
No, women earn less money on average because they're less likely to go for a raise or try to get more money from their boss.coxafloppin said:What? Aggressiveness? I allways thought it was because women cost a company more through maternity leave?ultrachicken said:It's less acceptable for women to be aggressive (this results in the average woman receiving a lower wage than the average man)
Yeah thats right, i read that article.S.R.S. said:Double standards?
Oh and a woman can get a man arrested for indecent exposure if she see's him undressing in an open window in his own house at (added) five in the morning after cutting through his yard "bringing her child to school".
I think of Eddie Izzard when I hear this. He puts it in such a genius way. "Women wear whatever they want, and so do I." People should follow his example.Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
You gotta love Eddie Izzard.CrazyHaircut94 said:I think of Eddie Izzard when I hear this. He puts it in such a genius way. "Women wear whatever they want, and so do I." People should follow his example.Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
i have yet to meet a man that looks good in a dress.Pararaptor said:I've got a question: Why is it that a woman can wear trousers & no-one so much as bats an eyelid, yet a man who wears a dress is "a pervert"?
Same here. Maternity leave also allows other men to potentially fill in for the women's position at the job. These men gets months worth of a head start to rise up the pecking order as a result. Of course there is nothing to say another woman couldn't fill this temporary role and get the promotion, but seeing as how female pregnancy is fairly common, the oppurtunities maternity leave will present, will occur regularly in offices.coxafloppin said:What? Aggressiveness? I allways thought it was because women cost a company more through maternity leave?ultrachicken said:It's less acceptable for women to be aggressive (this results in the average woman receiving a lower wage than the average man)
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Ha ha. Ha ha ha ha ha. Ha. Ha.Daveman said:In the UK our sports teams are so manly and sexually alluring that when we go out on "social nights" we have to dress up in such a way as to appear less attractive i.e. wearing skirts, dressed in tight lycra, pretending to be gimps etc etc. Plus it's a laugh.
edit: I didn't go on the gimp one...
What I have to say is very irrelevant, but just for the sake of the metaphor, a lock that can't be opened by any key is an equally shitty lock, so the metaphor should imply 1 lock=1 key.Break said:My favourite thing about that quote is that it's insulting on so many levels, you know? I mean, it doesn't just reinforce the whole "if a man likes sex, who cares, he's a man, but if a woman likes sex, she's a disgusting whore" thing - it also assumes the kind of backwards sexual and gender identity that women's rights movements have been railing against for decades. The key and lock metaphor implies that sexual pleasure, chastity, etc. is something a woman has to protect, otherwise she's failed at being a woman, while simultaneously encouraging the notion that a man's worth should be measured by the range of his sexual conquests, a concept steeped in discrimination and potentially harmful psychoses in its own right.Eukaryote said:Reposting here as it is necessary:
If a key opens many locks it is a master key, if a lock is opened by many keys it is a shitty lock.
And you don't even have to think that deeply - it basically calls promiscuous women "shitty" straight out, no pop sociology required. You rarely come across a sentence that can be so universally insulting and disgusting - it's really quite impressive.