I guess "least harmful" was kind of an unfortunate way to describe genetic manipulation on my part, but I'm simply getting tired of the general idea that the whole idea is somehow evil and will eventually lead to apocalypse and/or a genetically perfected army of evil soldiers from North-Korea. Possible, but doubtful. There's still nukes, and those are WAY easier to handle.Blood Brain Barrier said:Not at all. There's a difference between saying something's a bad idea and saying it's potentially harmful. I don't think we can stop our own progress. We'll keep going until we know everything there is to know, even if that may be our downfall. Plus there are beneficial aspects of gene manipulation.Cactoos said:Sure, but then again, I don't think stopping all scientific research simply because it might (I can't stress the word 'might' enough, seeing as you decided to go with 'will', as in 'I can and will predict the future') someday be used for something evil is rational. Electricity has been (and, I guess, 'will' be) used to torture and kill people; surely you don't think lamps and computers are a bad idea?Blood Brain Barrier said:Yeah... not really. The difference is it can and will be used for warfare and to control the population, just like almost every other scientific discovery.Cactoos said:Genetic manipulation is probably one of the least harmful things the human race has come up with recently. We've been manipulating genes through blind chance for thousands of years. The only difference is that nowadays it can be done precisely.
When I said "least harmful", I meant actually that it will (in my opinion) in the end do more good than evil. I think the answer to curing all diseases lies in perfecting gene manipulation. Oh, and also, future technology will probably be based on DNA, simply because it's such a perfect way of saving and sending information. But in order for that to happen, I do believe we need to learn everything there is to know about genes.
Let's hope I'm right, eh?