Cherry picking, ain't it something? If you're asking me to weigh up my enjoyment of Disney films --and yeah, they're alright, although I enjoy the originals more than the ones lifted from existing stories-- against the fucking deluge of slashfic bullshit that floods the internet I think I could live without The Jungle Book existing.1337mokro said:Why is there a right to not have shit floating around? Why not be allowed to use something as inspiration several decades after it was first made?rob_simple said:Then why not go make up your own stories in a completely different world, instead of desecrating the work of others with fanfic nonsense? If you concede that anything that does get done after his death is not going to be canon, anyway, then it's still abiding by the guy's wishes.1337mokro said:.....No.
I don't agree. Sure it would be a sad thing but in the end you are dead. Your idea now belongs to humanity rather than just one person. Now thanks to Disney though we still have to wait 60 years after you croak before we can start desecrating your work but it will and should happen.
Such is the nature of ideas. They can't be yours forever.
Imagine if we still had to pay money to build airplanes and could only build biplanes just because the original inventor didn't want his "vision of biplanes sullied by single winged planes" (yes powered flight, all flight with engines, WAS patented at one time).
You can have the original books be the only thing that is actually canon but you can't section of a part of our culture as private territory forever.
This is why the world is full of over-saturated bullshit nowadays, because people never know when to leave well enough alone.
Also, your plane analogy doesn't work at all, since air travel is actually hugely beneficial to international trade and hindering it would have a catastrophic effect on the global economy.
The only reason to bastardise a classic work of fiction is to line the pockets of the greedy and serve as a masturbatory aid for fanboys who don't know what's good for them.
Seriously imagine if George Lucas did not have copyright till fucking 2070? The time around which I fucking retire from the job I don't even have yet and I was born after the movies were made! Imagine what you could do to salvage that universe with someone who actually can make movies at the helm?
You see you focus on the bad parts. I can ignore the bad parts. What I can't do is ignore the possible gems I might never get to enjoy because of restrictive copyright and auteur mentality.
Though please do explain to me how bastardizing a work of classic fiction worked out for Disney. Are they not some of your favourite movies from your childhood? What BASTARDS!!! It's a good thing they lobbied long and hard to make sure no one else could build an empire on public domain work... not even small time fans who just enjoy to write short stories or make small fan movies or fan mods for games. What horrible greedy people those are.
Like the Middle Earth Skyrim mod that was slapped in the face righteously so because these horrible disgusting scummy people were bastardizing the Tolkien works by making a mod for a game for it...
Narrow views. They are abundant.
There's a difference between 'taking inspiration' and just jumping on the bloated cash cow corpse to try and wring out a few more sequels to an already convoluted universe. I don't think there's a single author in existence who doesn't admit to taking inspiration from other great authors, but the ones we remember are the ones who use that inspiration to build their own stories, rather than just hitch their wagon to whatever's popular.
Case in point: J.K. Rowling. She gets a lot of shit for ripping off Tolkien, and while the accusations aren't entirely unfounded at least she created her own universe with some borrowed ideas, and as a result has created a story that is now just as beloved by a generation as Tolkien's work was.
Other than that, you talk almost entirely in hypothetical situations, with this stuff about 'gems I might never get to enjoy,' but I say, if there really is someone fit to take Martin's place as writer to this Game of Thrones stuff, but he is not allowed to do so, then they will use their inspiration to create their own worlds with their own characters.
A good writer will create good material no matter what they are writing about; a hack writer will only succeed by cashing in on an established universe.
And I'm sorry but I don't really understand your Star Wars point? Given that it's the strongest argument we have in this day and age for leaving a property alone.