Goddammit...

Recommended Videos

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
Sieron said:
ShadowsofHope said:
Sieron said:
The site is mostly patrolled by self-righteous socialist/borderline communist. Those who refuse to "fall in line" get banned sooner or later due to the retarded amounts of idiocy and intolerance by those in power.

For example: Please observe as the intolerant Canucks attack this and hide behind the excuse of something totally unrelated.
Troll post, I'll assume?

..And we're Canadians, thank you. Not fucking "Canucks".
It was more of a reference to being banned for political viewpoint rather then valid evidence. Why else would i even mention politics? True I assumed everyone knew her particular opinion, but I figured her reputation proceeded her, especially when most posters at least in this thread seem to know her despite their opinions. The rest of it was designed to antagonize the moderators on this site, they are rather notorous for linear acceptance.
No, she was banned for the image of a middle finger at the poster she was responding to. Her political views had little to do with it, but please.. do keep the victim complex if it makes you feel better.
 

Jimmyjames

New member
Jan 4, 2008
725
0
0
To the OP-

I'd be inclined to say that forums in general have been getting worse and worse. It's amazing to see how many people are so ready to argue about stupid crap with people they don't know. It's one of the big reasons I haven't been very active around here for awhile.

I really think it's reflective of just how frustrated so many people are these days. Things are shitty lately so people are acting out their frustrations on random people they'll never meet.

It's safe, I guess. At least they aren't going crazy with a knife in the supermarket or anything.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
ShadowsofHope said:
Sieron said:
The site is mostly patrolled by self-righteous socialist/borderline communist. Those who refuse to "fall in line" get banned sooner or later due to the retarded amounts of idiocy and intolerance by those in power.

For example: Please observe as the intolerant Canucks attack this and hide behind the excuse of something totally unrelated.
Troll post, I'll assume?

..And we're Canadians, thank you. Not fucking "Canucks".
Relax and go with the troll... I'm sure no harm was meant.
Yes, sorry.. brief moment of loss of control there.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
Cuddly Razor said:
Did you actually read the post she was replying to?
He was directly insulting her, as Agema does constantly.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/for...l-Socialism-where-do-YOU-stand?page=2#8459179

Go on, tell me where exactly he "directly insulted" her. I've read the post over countless times, and find nothing to support such claim. Heck, we get people calling Socialist leaning individuals on this site "State worshippers", "Freedom haters", "Communists", "Power Hungry Elitists" and do you know how we put up with it?

Reasonable debate. Imaging "flipping the bird" at someone on the Escapist is a breach of forum rules. End of story.
 

Kortney

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,958
0
0
Cuddly Razor said:
If both are against the rules, then why are people able to flame teddy constantly?
I don't know, you'll have to show me a case by case example. I don't follow her posts.

I'm not arguing for the innocence of those who aggravate her, I'm just saying anyone who flames back like that is asking for a banning.
 
May 23, 2010
1,328
0
0
ShadowsofHope said:
The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
ShadowsofHope said:
Sieron said:
The site is mostly patrolled by self-righteous socialist/borderline communist. Those who refuse to "fall in line" get banned sooner or later due to the retarded amounts of idiocy and intolerance by those in power.

For example: Please observe as the intolerant Canucks attack this and hide behind the excuse of something totally unrelated.
Troll post, I'll assume?

..And we're Canadians eh? Not those Canuck hosers.
Chill out eh? No harm was meant.
Yeah, sorry eh... brief moment of loss of control there.
No problem :)
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
Cuddly Razor said:
*cough*
"User was not banned for this post but for being a consistent troublemaker. ~Moderator"
Not for the post directly, but over the sum of some of her more extreme posts that one didn't help her case.

Cuddly Razor said:
Which is rather odd, when you consider the fact that an admin considered her for moderator status when the new mods were chosen.
So? Being considered for moderator status doesn't give you immunity from being a prick to other posters.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
ShadowsofHope said:
The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
ShadowsofHope said:
Sieron said:
The site is mostly patrolled by self-righteous socialist/borderline communist. Those who refuse to "fall in line" get banned sooner or later due to the retarded amounts of idiocy and intolerance by those in power.

For example: Please observe as the intolerant Canucks attack this and hide behind the excuse of something totally unrelated.
Troll post, I'll assume?

..And we're Canadians eh? Not those Canuck hosers.
Chill out eh? No harm was meant.
Yeah, sorry eh... brief moment of loss of control there.
No problem :)
Wait a momen-.. Oh, Clever. Clever. ;)
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,911
0
0
Didn't know she had been booted, but...kinda surprised it didn't happen sooner. I've read her posts and cringed on many occasion.

OT: No, I'm out of the loop despite visiting this website everyday.
 

Kortney

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,958
0
0
ShadowsofHope said:
Cuddly Razor said:
Did you actually read the post she was replying to?
He was directly insulting her, as Agema does constantly.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/for...l-Socialism-where-do-YOU-stand?page=2#8459179

Go on, tell me where exactly he "directly insulted" her. I've read the post over countless times, and find nothing to support such claim. Heck, we get people calling Socialist leaning individuals on this site "State worshippers", "Freedom haters", "Communists", "Power Hungry Elitists" and do you know how we put up with it?

Reasonable debate. Imaging "flipping the bird" at someone on the Escapist is a breach of forum rules. End of story.
Thank you!

I agree. The post she responded to was not an attack what so ever. It was someone expressing their view on Fascism and she didn't like it so she flamed them.

To those who were not connected with her, it's a pretty clear cut issue. You guys defending her are friends of her - and I understand why you are defending her, but you should at least acknowledge the huge amounts of bias you are exhibiting.
 

manaman

New member
Sep 2, 2007
3,218
0
0
OP: You do realize directly insulting other users (even mods) is against the rules. Trying to add a addendum of your point being proved right if you do incur mod wrath for it doesn't make it so if you violated the rules in the process of stating that point.


OT: The rules exist to encourage a sense of community and discussion. Nobody would bother speaking up if there was a unquestioned elite due to popularity that where there constantly to call them stupid for disagreeing with them. Hence the insult rule.

They are usually pretty lenient on jokes (unless they don't realize it is a joke), and definitely lenient on calling an idea or opinion dumb, but they don't tolerate direct attacks. The reason enforcement can see so sporadic is because the mods don't exactly patrol the forums. The report button you see under every post is there so that you, the community can decide what you find offensive, and report it.

There have been times where reporting was so sporadic they lowered the bar on what becomes visible to the mods in the mod queue. At times it has been as low as one user reporting a post adds it to the mod queue.

The best thing you can do to help shape the place how you want it is to use that report button anytime you see a user breaking a rule, don't wait for you yourself to be insulted.

Sanguinius- The Angel said:
Oh no, someone got banned for flaming? I wouldn't call that the Escapist going to hell. I'd call that the Escapist staying right on the straight and narrow.
It happens every time a high post count celeb gets banned, even Indigo Dingo had people rooting for him and hardly everyone liked him while he was around. TheNecroswanson took to insulting people left and right before he got banned and still people where calling it unjustified, pointing to only the post he was banned for and asking it that was really worthy of a ban.
 

xmbts

Still Approved by Shock
Legacy
May 30, 2010
20,800
37
53
Country
United States
I just noticed that right before I saw this oddly enough.

I never actually talked to her but I remember liking her avatars.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,976
0
0
Who the hell is Demented Teddy?

edit: Oh she was a P.R.I.A.T.E. member.
Guys, I know you love your usergroup, but when you spend 99% of your time in there are rarely come out to the forums proper we really have no idea who you're talking about.

I dunno, I guess it's good she was banned. I want the escapist to return to the iron fisted regime it was in 2008, you people get away with too much now-a-days.
 
May 23, 2010
1,328
0
0
Sieron said:
The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
ShadowsofHope said:
The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
ShadowsofHope said:
Sieron said:
The site is mostly patrolled by self-righteous socialist/borderline communist. Those who refuse to "fall in line" get banned sooner or later due to the retarded amounts of idiocy and intolerance by those in power.

For example: Please observe as the intolerant Canucks attack this and hide behind the excuse of something totally unrelated.
Troll post, I'll assume?

..And we're Canadians eh? Not those Canuck hosers.
Chill out eh? No harm was meant.
Yeah, sorry eh... brief moment of loss of control there.
No problem :)
Well that was quite the sad attempt between the two of you to flame me; I actually chuckled reading that. I would make a return comment involving two Canucks and a light bulb in celebration of that, but I fear that may be too witty for you both.

OT: My argument is certainly not that she did not deserve punitive action for the particular post, but the concept of the previous offences which, as I observed, typically involved others attacking her political beliefs in general rather than criticizing her particular view on one topic.


You are a troll.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
Sieron said:
Well that was quite the sad attempt between the two of you to flame me; I actually chuckled reading that. I would make a return comment involving two Canucks and a light bulb in celebration of that, but I fear that may be too witty for you both.
Of course. /eyeroll

Sieron said:
OT: My argument is certainly not that she did not deserve punitive action for the particular post, but the concept of the previous offences which, as I observed, typically involved others attacking her political beliefs in general rather than criticizing her particular view on one topic.
Oh yes, because she is the only one whom has ever been attacked for her political belief's with or without due provocation.. [sub]Obvious sarcasm is obvious[/sub]

Seriously, the victim complex here is quite apparent. If the Hardcore Socialists, Communists, Capitalists, and anyone else can take a stingy post for their political affiliation, Fascists certainly can as well.. without crude imagery for the opposing poster.
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
Well, if the world was perfect, she wouldn't have been banned and everyone would get along just fine and dandy regardless of what their opinions and beliefs are. But, it's not.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,621
0
0
Cuddly Razor said:
ShadowsofHope said:
Cuddly Razor said:
Did you actually read the post she was replying to?
He was directly insulting her, as Agema does constantly.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/for...l-Socialism-where-do-YOU-stand?page=2#8459179

Go on, tell me where exactly he "directly insulted" her. I've read the post over countless times, and find nothing to support such claim. Heck, we get people calling Socialist leaning individuals on this site "State worshippers", "Freedom haters", "Communists", "Power Hungry Elitists" and do you know how we put up with it?

Reasonable debate. Imaging "flipping the bird" at someone on the Escapist is a breach of forum rules. End of story.
Reasoned debate huh? http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/528.236805-Poll-Socialism-where-do-YOU-stand?page=2#8462048
Now you tell me, why did he feel the need to bring Fascism up? Wasn't a jab at Teddy at all?
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/528.236795-Dude-you-have-no-Quran?page=3#8485186
Why the need to bring fascism up? Why the need to write it like that?

Oh wait, and here we have him admitting to saying stuff to her purely for amusement:
http://i1011.photobucket.com/albums/af233/DementedTeddums/Agemaslanderevidence.jpg?t=1286676110

I think the flipping off was rather justified based on this small example of his posts directed at her. She has debated with him on numerous occasions before, and yet he continues to intentionally post antagonist comments such as that.
Uh, no. It isn't. If the rest of us can take it without such posts, Teddy certainly could as well. And if you didn't read my post, I said in that post linked. Though no less, I have no doubt you could not actually find a direct insult at her person in it.

I'll give you the last one, but the first two? History speaks volumes on the nature of Fascism where it has been present, mate. Just because you don't like to hear it, or like to quietly discard those little devils in the detail (as we all do, at some point) doesn't make it less truthful than it is.
 

Ace of Spades

New member
Jul 12, 2008
3,302
0
0
I try to post what I feel while staying under the radar of the moderators, and as such, I am not a remarkable poster in any way, but I have yet to have them crack down on me.
OT: I left Heroes for a season and came back to find that what little sense of coherence had completely deteriorated. I actually really liked the first season, but it gradually became less interesting to me.