These people are most likely gonna get sued big time.
Could they really just not wait another month?
Could they really just not wait another month?
There will be the temptation. It is always there lurking in the corners. Staring at you.Demon ID said:God damn it, I do hope they don't distribute this because I hate the idea of having too stay away from the internet until the 14th.
My opinion is right here.mad825 said:was it logical living it on a open network (on the sense of making it connected to the mesh,the internet) anyway? surely they must have seen something like this coming.
As strange as it sounds, it's actually very common for a hacker group to do something incredible and then keep it to themselves, especially in the console modding community.Therumancer said:It strikes me as bloody unlikely that a hacker group would admit something like this, but then not release the game. It sounds like a way of experimenting with having their cake and eating it too, all the publicity from a "we were hacked" stunt without giving away a few thousand copies via torrents before they "catch on" and stop it.
My first thoughts echo your post, but......Straying Bullet said:Proof or it didn't happen.
I am curious though.
Good Avatar.SlainPwner666 said:
Not necessarily. Various updates can cripple a modded 360, however modders can often counter this by updating newer versions of their firmware allowing (if only temporarily) online play. It's a game of table tennis basically. Each attempting to counter what has been done by the other side.zombie711 said:if a 360 game is pirated and put on the Internet don't you need a blank 360 disk to play the game, which essentialy means you need a moded 360 and when an update comes you get banned and have to stick to single player
Pretty much.0a0x0e0 said:So in other words "I can't understand why anybody else would have a view point different than my own!"Daystar Clarion said:Who would risk being sued by MS for a Halo game? If it was something like Kotor 3 I could understand.
That's BS, there are many hackers who do not announce when they've hacked anything, and simply do it for the joy of hacking.JakeTheSnakeMan said:Why wouldn't the hackers admit to it. That's the whole point. There would be no point in doing it if no one knew you did it. That would be like landing on Mars and not telling anyone. It's just a pissing contest; It's all for bragging rights. If they get caught, it means they did something worth catching. If they don't get caught it means they're better than those who would catch them.
Blizzard got $3 million, which was a reasonable amount given how said server made about $3 million worth of microtransactions during it's lifetime, the $85 million of "statutory damages" went to actishit.Mackheath said:Well, since Blizzard hammered a single person for $88 million, Microsoft will probably find them, get them in the courts and sued for their souls and every penny they have touched or will ever touch.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you here, but... how do you know?Arachon said:That's BS, there are many hackers who do not announce when they've hacked anything, and simply do it for the joy of hacking.JakeTheSnakeMan said:Why wouldn't the hackers admit to it. That's the whole point. There would be no point in doing it if no one knew you did it. That would be like landing on Mars and not telling anyone. It's just a pissing contest; It's all for bragging rights. If they get caught, it means they did something worth catching. If they don't get caught it means they're better than those who would catch them.