Then you read more of the article, which points out how in the 1950s, Captain America became a psychopath that went after communists because that was where the money was, and things don't seem quite so sacred anymore. The fact that this was later retconned to change it to someone else in no way undoes the bit where these characters are not so immutable as people make them out to be and it is absolutely ridiculous to call anything after "Captain America...Commie Smasher" a slap in the face.Caramel Frappe said:To me, Marvel pulling a 'Captain America was a Hydra agent all along' stunt really got to me, and not in a good way.
I mean ... and I quote from Wiki (yeah not the best reliable source but it's usually accurate).
Simon said Captain America was a consciously political creation; he and Kirby were morally repulsed by the actions of Nazi Germany in the years leading up to the United States' involvement in World War II and felt war was inevitable: "The opponents to the war were all quite well organized. We wanted to have our say too."
Captain America was created as WW2 propaganda for disposable funny books. And then he became...whatever the hell else his writers wanted him to be at the time. At that point, the creator's intent borders on irrelevant.
The problem seems to come up only when one's personal idea of a character is infringed upon. Now, this may be something in common consciousness (Superman doesn't kill, Batman doesn't use guns), but the problem is it is betrayed by the fundamentally mutable nature of comic books. And the thing about Captain America is that even as an icon of the cultural zeitgeist, he is someone where opinions divide. Some people think he should be a Christ figure, and some people think he should be out there punching Muslims and hippies. That's how we got "Commie Smasher" Cap in the first place.
...come to think of it, both are technically Christ figures depending on who you ask. Some people want Jesus to be Hippie Dave, all Chillax and such, and some want him to be out there slaughtering the infidels...whoops, wrong word. Point remains, this is what happens when you're talking about a vague idea. There's that whole Team America "America Fuck Yeah" thing, but the reality is that's parodying actual people. Actual ideologies. Captain America can very well stand for imperialism and militarism and a ton of other things that really are part of someone's "American Dream." And to some extent, he has. And Marvel pissed people off when Cap went the other way, too, and renounced his title.
Same thing happened with Superman. The problem with these characters is that their implementation will always step on toes and always "get to" people.
But I say all this knowing it's pointless, because as I do I'm watching people complain that Peter Capaldi is the worst Doctor because he used a gun and the Doctor never uses a weapon. Unless you're Matt Smith, David Tennant, Christopher Eccleston, John Hurt, Colin Baker, Peter Davison, Tom Baker or Jon Pertwee. But dammit, their idea of the character is more important than anything else. Even facts.
I don't understand it, but I do know it's a thing.