lostzombies.com said:
A previous topic kind of got me thinking; has a game offended you? I Don't mean foul language but the subject matter or the way it was conveyed? I can say pretty honestly that I have played video games for around 18 years now and only one game has struck me as ''nah, that isn't right''
That game is the XBLA Toy Soldiers.
Now at first glance the game seems harmless, it's a bunch of toys on a table top in a classic towers defense game. but after playing for a few minutes, it dawned on me that the game was hiding its true content beind a playful name.
If you zoom in on individual 'toys' you see sa expressions as they walk into machinegun fire, while the gunners laugh and smile, the same when mustard gas is released, the gunners are laughing and slapping their thighs! All the while the enemy 'toys' walk slowly to their deaths, which are portrayed just as realistically as any death in COD.
I wasn't sure what offended me, I have played game where you shoot civillians, gun down animals etc and have never been offended. It dawned on me that it was because the game makers were making fun/light of the war. All shooters dealing with real events (D-Day etc) try to show the events realistically but with respect. It was blatently obvious that this game was accurately portraying the slaughter of WW1 but poking fun at it. They tried to disguise this fact by simply caling the game 'toy soldiers' when infact it had nothign to do with toys apart from the odd boss. The vast majority of the game comprises of you gunning down and gassing hundreds of soldiers who crawl around on the floor dying and choking, while your troops roll about laughing their asses off.
So games like GTA, Soldier of Fortune, manhunt etc never offended me in the least, it was eithre over the top comicbook violence or showed real events in a respectful way.
Has any game offended you either by suprise or just in general?
I found
Toy Soldiers affect me in quite a profound way too, but I'm not sure whether I was full blown offended by it...
I felt that it portrayed the horror and senselessness of World War 1 quite well, perhaps too well in fact, and I find that I can only manage a few levels at a time before I'm overcome with the feeling of senseless waste and get a bit depressed.
I'm not sure that I agree with you that it's poking fun at World War 1, but after playing I realised that any
game that makes entertainment out of that war can be in dubious taste, even if the soldiers are only tin toys which explode into gears and cogs.
The reason the soldiers are based on the old toy soldiers, I think is because that's the only way on earth they would have ever got approval to release that game on X-Box Live... it would have been too horrific to make that game with the soldiers being real instead of toys.
I think the developers had the idea to make a World War 1 trench defence game first, then made them toys when they realised that was the only possible way to approach the subject, by tying it in with the old toy soldier that boys used to play with before video games.
I think the reason slaughtering hundreds of virtual soldiers in this game is far worse than in other games is that, in other games it's quite funny to laugh at the dumb A.I. and it's poor path-finding, which sends wave after wave of grunts into your machine gun fire, but when you're doing it in this game it's not so funny if you realise that's what actually happened in real life.
The generals were the dumb A.I. and the brave soldiers were the lobotomised grunts with atrocious path-finding abilities, who were ordered to walk at machine guns or be executed for cowardice.