Melopahn said:
Quaxar said:
Melopahn said:
Legalize and regulate all of them From heroin to weed. The most intoxicating drug on the planet is already legal, as is the deadliest (alcohol and cigarettes respectively).
The most... intoxicating and deadly drug on the planet... I, um... what? This is either trolling, ignorance in regard of various illegal substances or I'm missing an important point there. I'm sorry but care to elaborate please?
http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Addictive_Properties
Alcohol is the most intoxicating, and cigarettes clearly kill the most... if you haven't figured that out then your ignorance in regard of various illegal substances is hilarious

.
http://science.iowamedicalmarijuana.org/pdfs/safety/Nutt%20Rational%20Scale%20Drug%20Harms%20Lancet%202007.pdf
http://www.americanscientist.org/libraries/documents/200645104835_307.pdf
This info tells us that Heroin is the most likely to kill you as far as a substance go (they take into account street vendors failing to keep the product pure, and they state that if it was legal it would be moved down the list. They also show how Nutmeg and Datura are the 2nd and third deadliest while neither of them are illegal. Further they state that Marijuana and LSD have never been responsible for a death by substance?
Seriously though I can't tell if you were trolling or have just never looked up any science behind all things drug. I have a ton more sources as well.
So you're referring to the 2010 Nutt study, I see.
<spoiler=Short summary for those interested>http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2c/HarmCausedByDrugsTable.svg/600px-HarmCausedByDrugsTable.svg.png
Might I direct your gaze to a part of your very own second link:
Tobacco and alcohol were included because their
extensive use has provided reliable data on their risks and
harms, providing familiar benchmarks against which the
absolute harms of other drugs can be judged. However,
direct comparison of the scores for tobacco and alcohol
with those of the other drugs is not possible since the fact
that they are legal could affect their harms in various
ways, especially through easier availability.
Saying alcohol is more harmful than hard drugs is equal to saying cars are more dangerous than a F/A-18 Hornet. Of course, a driving license can be obtained by almost everyone with ease whereas there's far less people piloting a fighter jet plus they've got more experience in it than random drivers.
Heroin addicts know what they're doing most of the time, they do it in groups so as to watch each other, a lot carry naloxone to cancel out side-effects just in case and mostly you don't start with jamming needles in your veins. On the other hand every stupid little teenager can get his hands on a few bottles of booze because it's legal and culturally accepted and even if they get caught red-handed the worst they can expect is the cops confiscating the alcohol and maybe telling the parents. And of course there's not really anything of a "coke snorting game" or "binge snorting" or so.
And in any way I'd imagine the fact that the worst drugs are already legal should rather be a thought
away from legalizing yet
more addictive substances .