Help me stop a zoophile

[Rikomag132]

I'm sorry, but this is just too ridiculous. It just screams trolling, I mean, you just so happened to be unable to post because captcha's not wo- wait, *checks post history* okay, I'll give you that one, but still.

However if you actually are being honest, I hope the lion returns the favor and goes anal. Why? Because lions have barbs on their dick.

 

[IamLEAM1983]

So, let's recap.

You know this guy who's a zoophile and who's about to go abroad to act as an animal caretaker for lions. The guy tells you he'd like to screw a lion because lions are so HAWT, HNNNG. He also tells you you'll have a hard time contacting him (which I can't really believe myself) and you've still put it in your mind to try and stop him.

At this point, assuming this is real and not some late and rather lame April Fools joke, I'd say you're too late. If he doesn't end up mauled or devoured, he'll probably end up prosecuted. Seeing as he's traveling abroad and I *think* you've eluded to him going in Africa, this may or may not be an issue.

In some African countries, zoophilia is treated in the same way it is here. In others... Well, I'll admit my knowledge of the Koran isn't up to snuff, but I'm pretty sure zealots out there made up some kind of anti-bestiality clause in the Charia.

Which would be bad news for your friend. The Charia doesn't have kid gloves, when it's being interpreted literally by a bunch of God-fearing folks.

 

[Risingblade]

Let him try to stick it in a lioness. This problem will take care of itself.

He never said it was a female lion...

 

[Elementary - Dear Watson]

No it wasn't "my first reaction" to post here. Did you not read what I typed? I said I sent the info to those email addresses a month ago. Also, i've posted in several different forums not just this one. I also don't get why there's all this hostility brewing in the topic. Have nothing helpful? That's fine. You're also aiming your satire at the wrong person.

Woah... calm it princess... my satire is aimed generally to anyone bothered to read it!

And no, I am probably not being helpfull... that's because the whole thing seems flipping rediculous... the stories just don't seem to make sense... surely the company he works for has a website with a phone number on? Or an email address? I don't see what anyone here is really going to do!?

Get on google, find an email/phone/address and tell 'em... it's common sense... by telling us, you are pretty much just giving us a free laugh! Cos that is hilarious stuff... A guy whose lifelong dream is to rape a lion... not even a Batman villain backstory is that genius... and that has a guy who killed his grandma because he wanted to take her apart and put her back together...! :|

 

[Elementary - Dear Watson]

So, let's recap.

You know this guy who's a zoophile and who's about to go abroad to act as an animal caretaker for lions. The guy tells you he'd like to screw a lion because lions are so HAWT, HNNNG. He also tells you you'll have a hard time contacting him (which I can't really believe myself) and you've still put it in your mind to try and stop him.

At this point, assuming this is real and not some late and rather lame April Fools joke, I'd say you're too late. If he doesn't end up mauled or devoured, he'll probably end up prosecuted. Seeing as he's traveling abroad and I *think* you've eluded to him going in Africa, this may or may not be an issue.

In some African countries, zoophilia is treated in the same way it is here. In others... Well, I'll admit my knowledge of the Koran isn't up to snuff, but I'm pretty sure zealots out there made up some kind of anti-bestiality clause in the Charia.

Which would be bad news for your friend. The Charia doesn't have kid gloves, when it's being interpreted literally by a bunch of God-fearing folks.

He mentioned Zimbabwe... Its a prdominantly Christian Country with less than 1% Muslim... So Sharia/Charia prob won't apply, but I don't think Robert Mugabe will like it either...

The only beastiality case I know of in Zimbabwe is this gem!!

 

[Don Savik]

Im sorry, but if he finds himself sexually attracted to a Lion, there must be only one reason...

Well I've seen some people sexually attracted to......questionable things.....that I think them screwing a lion would be a better alternative.

Personally I would contact whatever organization he is going with, they should have a number, and just because some people on this forum think that all laws should be broken unless it harms another, its not a bad thing to at least INFORM THEM of the man they're going to have to work with. If they dismiss it and say its silly (which they probably won't) they will at least keep a closer eye on him with the animals, and not have an excuse if he does end up trying to molest the animals.

 

[Bouncer]

I'm surprised they didn't do some kind of background check before hiring this guy... then again it's just not something you'd expect out of anyone.

Actually, that's not really true in this society... Crazy people are crazy.

Since I think this is completely absurd, let me answer in a way that is equally as absurd:

First of all, To those people who say that said lion will maul him, what if he covers himself in lion pheromones and seduces the lioness the old fashionned way.

Second, you keep saying Lion, are we talking about a male lion here? Not that there's anything wrong with male/male (As I'm told) But if the artwork depicts a male lion we've got an entirely new angle to the problem.

Thirdly to those who suggests he would tranqu the lion first, I don't know about you but fornicating with something that's unconcious just doesn't seem all that fun at all.

Fourth I'm surprised that nobody responded to you, obviously they didn't take you seriously just as I am not taking you seriously right now.

You know the line folks, doesn't matter had sex! Also, April Fools was yesterday.

This thread was also started yesterday.

In before Danyal (in New Zealand so I know things a day in advance now).

Once you get that smoking gun evidence just use the age old tactic of public humiliation

Not a bad idea, really. Start up a Facebook profile, Twitter account, and Youtube channel under the guy's name. Put all of your evidence on there. Make some stuff up, if you have to. Make some stuff up even if you don't have to. Everybody wins.

I don't think that would be a good idea. I could get sued for slander if I did.

As for phoning authorities, there's a few problems with that. First off, I don't know who exactly to call because I don't know exactly where he's going to be travelling. Second, I can't prove 100% that he's going to attempt anything. (But after countless posts about past relationships with his pets and lots of artwork and written fantasies about lions, it's not hard to put two and two together.)

That's why i've been trying to find the right email addresses of wildlife authorities, so I could send all the info and let them sort it out. I don't know what specific game reserves are over there, nor if they even have phone numbers to get in contact with.

It's not slander if it's true.

And if you're working with the fact that he's claimed to have had physical relationships with his pets as the only proof, you have to remember that there are ALOT of furries on the internet and I think that most of them lead pretty normal lives. The ones who would actively have physical relationships with animals, I beleive, have several screws loose.

Despite his having a facination with lions, I doubt that this is something he'd actually go through with, and if he does, he's likely to get caught eventually.

I know I said I'd answer this absudly but.. I don't know, this seems strange to me but not so out there to make me think it isn't possible. If it really worries you maybe you should try to contact his close friends, family or if he has no friends and no contact with is family, I doubt he has the confidence to go out and do something like that.

Unless the Crazy outweighs the lack of confidence.

Some people who never leave their homes should never leave their homes.

Im sorry, but if he finds himself sexually attracted to a Lion, there must be only one reason...

Couldn't have said it better myself.

 

[GistoftheFist]

Yes, I said lion. Male. I can't say for sure if it's only them or if it's lionesses too.

Im sorry, but if he finds himself sexually attracted to a Lion, there must be only one reason...

Well I've seen some people sexually attracted to......questionable things.....that I think them screwing a lion would be a better alternative.

Personally I would contact whatever organization he is going with, they should have a number, and just because some people on this forum think that all laws should be broken unless it harms another, its not a bad thing to at least INFORM THEM of the man they're going to have to work with. If they dismiss it and say its silly (which they probably won't) they will at least keep a closer eye on him with the animals, and not have an excuse if he does end up trying to molest the animals.

That's exactly what i've been trying to do, but like I said before I don't know what specific game reserve. I'm simply trying to inform the right people. If they listen and decide it's silly, that's their choice.

 

[Ed130 The Vanguard]

If he get's killed it would make a awesome Darwin Awards article.

Oh yeah April Fools to you too.

 

[TheVioletBandit]

I don't consider it abuse to have sex with an animal as long as it doesn't physically harm them. That being said, natural selection, if he wants to fuck a lion, his funeral.

Even though it may not physically hurt the animal it is still rape/molestation as the animal has no way to vocally object to or give consent for the action, and even if they could it's disgusting to take advantage of an animal like that which is most likely no more intelligent than a small child. Also, if he is having sex with dogs it probably is hurting them.

 

[TheVioletBandit]

I don't consider it abuse to have sex with an animal as long as it doesn't physically harm them. That being said, natural selection, if he wants to fuck a lion, his funeral.

Even though it may not physically hurt the animal it is still rape/molestation as the animal has no way to vocally object to or give consent for the action, and even if they could it's disgusting to take advantage of an animal like that which is most likely no more intelligent than a small child. Also, if he is having sex with dogs it probably is hurting them.

Sex is entirely a matter of perspective, we as humans take it very seriously, while animals don't. You take your dog to the park and some dog comes and shags her, by our definition the dog just raped her, but do you see your dog huddling in the corner for ages like some victim? Nope, animals just don't give a fuck about getting fucked.

The most they will perceive of it is a show of dominance which is completely normal. We all have dominant/submissive relationships with our pets or animals, it's just the way things are.

That being said, I clearly stated that it is wrong to do if it physically harms an animal, so clearly banging a female dog was out of the question to begin with.

It doesn't matter if the animal would see it as normal/okay or not. Morality comes from humanity and as such applies to humanity. Yeah, a male dog may mate with a female dog in the park, but because neither of the subjects in this scenario are human, human morality doesn't apply. The male dog neither knows of human morality or could understand it if he did, but an adult man is both aware of and understands the negative moral implications of this action. A young human child could very possibly be convince that someone molesting them is normal, or simply think it's normals because they do not know otherwise. Does this make the molestation any less wrong? No, it doesn't because the adult responsible for the molestation knows that it's wrong, and their the one doing the action.

 

[Erana]

I don't consider it abuse to have sex with an animal as long as it doesn't physically harm them. That being said, natural selection, if he wants to fuck a lion, his funeral.

Even though it may not physically hurt the animal it is still rape/molestation as the animal has no way to vocally object to or give consent for the action, and even if they could it's disgusting to take advantage of an animal like that which is most likely no more intelligent than a small child. Also, if he is having sex with dogs it probably is hurting them.

Sex is entirely a matter of perspective, we as humans take it very seriously, while animals don't. You take your dog to the park and some dog comes and shags her, by our definition the dog just raped her, but do you see your dog huddling in the corner for ages like some victim? Nope, animals just don't give a fuck about getting fucked.

The most they will perceive of it is a show of dominance which is completely normal. We all have dominant/submissive relationships with our pets or animals, it's just the way things are.

That being said, I clearly stated that it is wrong to do if it physically harms an animal, so clearly banging a female dog was out of the question to begin with.

So you apparently are an everything-whisperer or something? How the fuck do you know what an animal feels? I'm not saying that all animals think just like humans do, but I know very well that a lot of them are very capable of emotions, in their own way. And even if an animal weren't to perceive rape in the same way, there's no telling if an individual animal would find that treatment and relationship to a human to be in some way traumatizing.

And while we're on the topic of raping lions, when they get a new mate, their kids tend to die. I would really like some concrete proof on there being no psychological significance of rape in species with that sort of thing going on before anyone goes, "Yeah, let's fuck the lions, they don't give a fuck." Especially with those videos of the crazy lioness who kept adopting baby prey animals.

 

[Relish in Chaos]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

 

[DugMachine]

I expect to see this in the new season of A Thousand Ways to Die

 

[tendaji]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

There's a furry who got accepted to go back to an African research station who this guy is targeting. The problem is that the OP is immediately tying Furry Pornography to Bestiality and thus claiming that this guy who is going to Zimbabwe fuck lions. Which is not the case.
In terms of the "relationship with his dog" the owner was afraid that the loss of the dog's testicles would actually alter the personality of the dog when they were removed and was afraid of basically getting a different dog back from the vet.

The person heading to Zimbabwe has been to Africa multiple times to help with research on lions, he's also been a part of teams here in the states, and has yet to have sex with the animals. So this guy is basically trolling by saying anyone who is a furry is only trying to have sex with animals if they go into a field that deals with animals.

 

[The Funslinger]

To be honest, I think a lion has personal defenses agains sexual predators... some fucking big claws!

Ummm... I don't really know what to suggest... errr... he has issues...!

Yeah, this topic scares and confuses me.

All I can say is (barring the obvious 'ew' factor) sex with an animal is unethical for the same reason testing on one is unethical. It can't give consent. If this guy doesn't see that, then he's a bad person.

That said, he's doing it regardless, so if he does see that, then he's probably even worse.

But damn, those poor, traumatized house pets... OP should launch a rescue operation and steal them.

 

[JochemHippie]

Zoophilia is a sexual orientation. Quite a twisted from a politically correct PoV.

As to it not being capable to give consent... I'd think he'll find out real fucking fast whether it gives consent or not.

Also I think that OP is probably not considering that he might be a harmless furry.

 

[Relish in Chaos]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

There's a furry who got accepted to go back to an African research station who this guy is targeting. The problem is that the OP is immediately tying Furry Pornography to Bestiality and thus claiming that this guy who is going to Zimbabwe fuck lions. Which is not the case.
In terms of the "relationship with his dog" the owner was afraid that the loss of the dog's testicles would actually alter the personality of the dog when they were removed and was afraid of basically getting a different dog back from the vet.

The person heading to Zimbabwe has been to Africa multiple times to help with research on lions, he's also been a part of teams here in the states, and has yet to have sex with the animals. So this guy is basically trolling by saying anyone who is a furry is only trying to have sex with animals if they go into a field that deals with animals.

If that's true, then there's no problem here.

 

[Heronblade]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

There's a furry who got accepted to go back to an African research station who this guy is targeting. The problem is that the OP is immediately tying Furry Pornography to Bestiality and thus claiming that this guy who is going to Zimbabwe fuck lions. Which is not the case.
In terms of the "relationship with his dog" the owner was afraid that the loss of the dog's testicles would actually alter the personality of the dog when they were removed and was afraid of basically getting a different dog back from the vet.

The person heading to Zimbabwe has been to Africa multiple times to help with research on lions, he's also been a part of teams here in the states, and has yet to have sex with the animals. So this guy is basically trolling by saying anyone who is a furry is only trying to have sex with animals if they go into a field that deals with animals.

If that's true, then there's no problem here.

I'm not sure I would go that far. If what Tendaji states is true, and bear in mind we have just as little reason to believe him as Gist for the time being, then the latter is a bigot who is guilty of libel, and from the sound of it, other forms of defamation.

Not that there's much we can do about that situation either. Public scoldings don't tend to work very well even when done face to face.

 

[Gizmo]

I'm gonna take a different stance to everyone else here (slightly different anyway) and say if he manages to fuck a lion maybe the dude deserves to fuck that lion.

You sir have a very good point, how many people can say that they've had sexual relations with a lion, you'd clearly have to be doing something right and by all means have at it.

Captcha: Quality Time
how strangely relevant.