Help me stop a zoophile

[Erana]

I don't consider it abuse to have sex with an animal as long as it doesn't physically harm them. That being said, natural selection, if he wants to fuck a lion, his funeral.

Even though it may not physically hurt the animal it is still rape/molestation as the animal has no way to vocally object to or give consent for the action, and even if they could it's disgusting to take advantage of an animal like that which is most likely no more intelligent than a small child. Also, if he is having sex with dogs it probably is hurting them.

Sex is entirely a matter of perspective, we as humans take it very seriously, while animals don't. You take your dog to the park and some dog comes and shags her, by our definition the dog just raped her, but do you see your dog huddling in the corner for ages like some victim? Nope, animals just don't give a fuck about getting fucked.

The most they will perceive of it is a show of dominance which is completely normal. We all have dominant/submissive relationships with our pets or animals, it's just the way things are.

That being said, I clearly stated that it is wrong to do if it physically harms an animal, so clearly banging a female dog was out of the question to begin with.

So you apparently are an everything-whisperer or something? How the fuck do you know what an animal feels? I'm not saying that all animals think just like humans do, but I know very well that a lot of them are very capable of emotions, in their own way. And even if an animal weren't to perceive rape in the same way, there's no telling if an individual animal would find that treatment and relationship to a human to be in some way traumatizing.

And while we're on the topic of raping lions, when they get a new mate, their kids tend to die. I would really like some concrete proof on there being no psychological significance of rape in species with that sort of thing going on before anyone goes, "Yeah, let's fuck the lions, they don't give a fuck." Especially with those videos of the crazy lioness who kept adopting baby prey animals.

 

[Relish in Chaos]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

 

[DugMachine]

I expect to see this in the new season of A Thousand Ways to Die

 

[tendaji]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

There's a furry who got accepted to go back to an African research station who this guy is targeting. The problem is that the OP is immediately tying Furry Pornography to Bestiality and thus claiming that this guy who is going to Zimbabwe fuck lions. Which is not the case.
In terms of the "relationship with his dog" the owner was afraid that the loss of the dog's testicles would actually alter the personality of the dog when they were removed and was afraid of basically getting a different dog back from the vet.

The person heading to Zimbabwe has been to Africa multiple times to help with research on lions, he's also been a part of teams here in the states, and has yet to have sex with the animals. So this guy is basically trolling by saying anyone who is a furry is only trying to have sex with animals if they go into a field that deals with animals.

 

[The Funslinger]

To be honest, I think a lion has personal defenses agains sexual predators... some fucking big claws!

Ummm... I don't really know what to suggest... errr... he has issues...!

Yeah, this topic scares and confuses me.

All I can say is (barring the obvious 'ew' factor) sex with an animal is unethical for the same reason testing on one is unethical. It can't give consent. If this guy doesn't see that, then he's a bad person.

That said, he's doing it regardless, so if he does see that, then he's probably even worse.

But damn, those poor, traumatized house pets... OP should launch a rescue operation and steal them.

 

[JochemHippie]

Zoophilia is a sexual orientation. Quite a twisted from a politically correct PoV.

As to it not being capable to give consent... I'd think he'll find out real fucking fast whether it gives consent or not.

Also I think that OP is probably not considering that he might be a harmless furry.

 

[Relish in Chaos]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

There's a furry who got accepted to go back to an African research station who this guy is targeting. The problem is that the OP is immediately tying Furry Pornography to Bestiality and thus claiming that this guy who is going to Zimbabwe fuck lions. Which is not the case.
In terms of the "relationship with his dog" the owner was afraid that the loss of the dog's testicles would actually alter the personality of the dog when they were removed and was afraid of basically getting a different dog back from the vet.

The person heading to Zimbabwe has been to Africa multiple times to help with research on lions, he's also been a part of teams here in the states, and has yet to have sex with the animals. So this guy is basically trolling by saying anyone who is a furry is only trying to have sex with animals if they go into a field that deals with animals.

If that's true, then there's no problem here.

 

[Heronblade]

I think this guy?s honestly bullshitting you, but if he?s telling the truth, you should let him do it and eventually get prosecuted. Of course, it?s animal abuse (no-one try to argue back at me saying it?s not, because I?ll just ignore it), but you don?t have much concrete evidence and, heck, it?s an African government. What the fuck are they going to do about it?

Also, it doesn't affect you and you don't know the damn animals, so why should you care? There are better things to be doing than futilely attempting to stop a troll/zoophile who claims he's going to shag a lion.

There's a furry who got accepted to go back to an African research station who this guy is targeting. The problem is that the OP is immediately tying Furry Pornography to Bestiality and thus claiming that this guy who is going to Zimbabwe fuck lions. Which is not the case.
In terms of the "relationship with his dog" the owner was afraid that the loss of the dog's testicles would actually alter the personality of the dog when they were removed and was afraid of basically getting a different dog back from the vet.

The person heading to Zimbabwe has been to Africa multiple times to help with research on lions, he's also been a part of teams here in the states, and has yet to have sex with the animals. So this guy is basically trolling by saying anyone who is a furry is only trying to have sex with animals if they go into a field that deals with animals.

If that's true, then there's no problem here.

I'm not sure I would go that far. If what Tendaji states is true, and bear in mind we have just as little reason to believe him as Gist for the time being, then the latter is a bigot who is guilty of libel, and from the sound of it, other forms of defamation.

Not that there's much we can do about that situation either. Public scoldings don't tend to work very well even when done face to face.

 

[Gizmo]

I'm gonna take a different stance to everyone else here (slightly different anyway) and say if he manages to fuck a lion maybe the dude deserves to fuck that lion.

You sir have a very good point, how many people can say that they've had sexual relations with a lion, you'd clearly have to be doing something right and by all means have at it.

Captcha: Quality Time
how strangely relevant.

 

[tendaji]

I'm not sure I would go that far. If what Tendaji states is true, and bear in mind we have just as little reason to believe him as Gist for the time being, then the latter is a bigot who is guilty of libel, and from the sound of it, other forms of defamation.

Not that there's much we can do about that situation either. Public scoldings don't tend to work very well even when done face to face.

If you want I can link you to his journals on Furaffinity that tells about his previous trips to Africa, and you can look at his pornography that he commissioned if you really want to (have to be signed in anyways). But the guys is a nature conservationists and knows how nasty lions can be if you upset them in anyway. He's not going to try to stick his penis in one's ass just so he can get off to the idea.