Hentai Collector Sentenced to Jail Over "Obscene" Material

jackknife402

New member
Aug 25, 2008
319
0
0
I live in Iowa, and depending on what county he was from(I didn't see this on the news) It is a possibility. We've got some pretty crazy judicials in a few of our counties, but the majority of them do not act in this way. We do seem to have plenty of cp cases though, and they might have been freaking out because of that. In the last decade Iowa law has gone a crusade to eliminate this form of cry, and it seems like he just happened to live in the wrong county.
 

NeoAC

Zombie Nation #LetsRise
Jun 9, 2008
8,574
0
0
I'm just going to chalk this up to America being America. The place where violent deaths are portrayed at least 15 times a day between the broadcast networks and no one bats an eye, yet you get riots in the streets over one 45 year old pierced boob.
 

w-Jinksy

New member
May 30, 2009
961
0
0
Irridium said:
Well, that is disgusting.

But their not even pictures of real people. Just drawings.

If I drew a stick figure bent over another stick figure, would that count as pornography and would I have to go to court for it?
only if the stick figure was smaller coloured pink and had bows on its head.

i agree this is is silly i mean a bloody drawing, they dont arrest all the countless people who view and buy rape related hentai.

I think america is just a little bit too obsessed with this crusade they seem to have against peadophiles which are in reality very rare individuals and ones who actually commit acts are even rarer.
 

cobra_ky

New member
Nov 20, 2008
1,643
0
0
AC10 said:
To add to this I certainly started "noticing" girls around the 6th or 7th grade when my hormones started raging. I additionally know a few people who lost their virginity at 13 and a few more at 14. I even know one gay guy who lost it at 12. None of them regret it and all of them engaged in consenting sexual activity. Could they be charged with sex with a minor, even though they had sex with other minors their own age?
Yes, and this has happened many, many times. The most recent case i heard was a bunch of adolescent girls being brought in on child porn charges because they had been distributing naked pictures of themselves.
 

Firia

New member
Sep 17, 2007
1,945
0
0
I am against this. Yes, by the sounds of the artical written, the guy was dumb. But I've read manga... A LOT! I've seen the most childlike characters sold as 16 or 18 years old, just cause that's how the artist draws. Was there something in the manga that pegged the "Children" as under age?

Most of all, it's not like this guy was marketing child porn. He had some manga that may or may not have contained underage hentai. The books could have been confiscated, end of story. The threat of jail could have instilled just enough fear in a maybe-wouldbe-offender. But 6 months and psych evals after release?? Over KILL.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
cobra_ky said:
AC10 said:
To add to this I certainly started "noticing" girls around the 6th or 7th grade when my hormones started raging. I additionally know a few people who lost their virginity at 13 and a few more at 14. I even know one gay guy who lost it at 12. None of them regret it and all of them engaged in consenting sexual activity. Could they be charged with sex with a minor, even though they had sex with other minors their own age?
Yes, and this has happened many, many times. The most recent case i heard was a bunch of adolescent girls being brought in on child porn charges because they had been distributing naked pictures of themselves.
This is getting pretty off topic, but I just don't think it's up to the government to tell ME when I'm ready to have sex and with whom and how I have it. Certainly the laws are in place to protect children who could be easily manipulated, but 18 is kind of far beyond what I call an easy manipulable child. Though other countries have it lower (15 in Sweden, 16 now in Canada with like 400000 additional exceptions to the rule, etc).
 

uncle-ellis

New member
Feb 4, 2009
621
0
0
Haha.

Dumb-ass shouldn't have imported pedo comics.

Also, looking through the comments in this topic,
Stop defending him!

I'm all for freedom of speech, information, ect, ect, But seriously?
This guy imported CHILD PORN! He went out of his way to import pictures of CHILDREN HAVING SEX!
 

One of Many

New member
Feb 3, 2010
331
0
0
Triffid said:
wow...people are actually defending this. I know it comes down to an issue of whether it is or isn't pedophilia, but c'mon. He is clearly a pervert. Why do so many people seem to argue the point that he has to harm a child before he is guilty? Does some kid need to be a sacrificial lamb before we can say he is a pervert?

Besides, how did he get caught? was he sharing it with online friends or something or did someone see it and report him?

Look, I understand when you defend someone that gets charged for having porn that they accidentally got (or was hacked) onto their computer, but this guy gets off to little kids and animal sex. That's perverse, it's not artistic. I could piss in someone's mouth and call it artistic expression, but I'm going to guess the recipient is going to think VERY differently. I think a 6 month sentence was too lenient.

Did you even read the first post in this thread? Christopher Handley was caught because someone from the Postal Service went through his mail. He wasn't handing this stuff out, he wasn't sharing it over the web. The cops only seized seven manga volumes and then searched his personal collection of over 1,200 volumes, retaining of that search, only 80 volumes, for reasons unknown.

As for your pissing comment, was the other person willing? Did you tie them up and force this? There are people that have strange fetishes. Besides a drawing is not a real person, no one was harmed in the making of a comic. I could buy a manga that is focused on a character running around killing people, that doesn't mean I'm gonna go kill people. Just because someone is looking to expand their collection with new books, that happen to involve sex with a minor, doesn't mean their going to run out and bugger a kid.
 

uncle-ellis

New member
Feb 4, 2009
621
0
0
Ph0t0n1c Ph34r said:
Further ammo for my "Ban Japan" campaign.
For that to happen someone would have to fully understand the mind-blowing depths of insanity that exists in Japan.

And I don't think that anyone is going to volunteer for that.
 

Gileseypops

New member
Sep 16, 2009
77
0
0
In my opinion, it depends entirely on what is deemed as 'child pornography'. If it is obviously an image of a young child then I think it is something to be concerned about and he may need some psychological evaluation....possibly not a sentence but definitely a chat with a psychiatrist. However, in my experience of Hentai, it is impossible not to find a character in a schoolgirls outfit or something that depicts a similar symbol of innocence and if this is the case I think there's nothing to worry about. The sentence however, I do think is a step too far. xx
 

Dr. Crawver

Doesn't know why he has premium
Nov 20, 2009
1,100
0
0
I don't know how to react really. It's fair enough if it is against the law to possess the magazine, but it seems increadably hardline, and needlessly strict
 

Sheo_Dagana

New member
Aug 12, 2009
966
0
0
Interestingly enough, one of the ways they were going to deem something to be 'virtual child pornography' was by looking at the size of a character's breasts. [/sigh] So is having Rukia hentai illegal just because she's a total A-cup?
 

Gindil

New member
Nov 28, 2009
1,621
0
0
AC10 said:
To add to this I certainly started "noticing" girls around the 6th or 7th grade when my hormones started raging. I additionally know a few people who lost their virginity at 13 and a few more at 14. I even know one gay guy who lost it at 12. None of them regret it and all of them engaged in consenting sexual activity. Could they be charged with sex with a minor, even though they had sex with other minors their own age?
I would be very careful with this line of reasoning. Recently, I know three girls were in trouble in their school because of "sexting" They sent some nude photos to their bfs. It didn't end well [http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/01/kids/]. Just because it works for a group, I don't think it may work for everyone.

Sheo_Dagana said:
Interestingly enough, one of the ways they were going to deem something to be 'virtual child pornography' was by looking at the size of a character's breasts. [/sigh] So is having Rukia hentai illegal just because she's a total A-cup?
Maybe he should have moved to Australia. That would have put him into even MORE hot water since that is EXACTLY what's happening there right now.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
uncle-ellis said:
Haha.

Dumb-ass shouldn't have imported pedo comics.

Also, looking through the comments in this topic,
Stop defending him!

I'm all for freedom of speech, information, ect, ect, But seriously?
This guy imported CHILD PORN! He went out of his way to import pictures of CHILDREN HAVING SEX!
Drawings. Unless I misread, he went somewhere and got drawings.

Drawings != Pictures.

Pictures involve real people in real situations at some point. Drawings involve fantasy figures in fantasy situations that never actually occured.

So either you'll need to accept that drawings of murder is the same as murder.

Or stop being biased.

Gets a little old with everyone treating violence as a lighter issue than sexuality.

"Comics/Anime about children being dissected alive? Shit that's fine dude. But pedophilia...OH SWEET GOD NO!"

uncle-ellis said:
Ph0t0n1c Ph34r said:
Further ammo for my "Ban Japan" campaign.
For that to happen someone would have to fully understand the mind-blowing depths of insanity that exists in Japan.

And I don't think that anyone is going to volunteer for that.
Then they'd have to fully understand how it pales in comparison to the bible belt in the US.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
While I question how the man spends his spare capital, I'm quite certain I don't think he should be placed in jail. Yes, the books may have contained material about children but is the theoritical abuse of children really a concern? Child pornography is illegal quite simply because your average reasonable person sees it as sexual abuse against a minor, and in this case I see no abuse. Moreover, if he was not actually displaying his collection to others he couldn't even reasonably be accused of a a crime in that regard either.

No children were harmed, no distinct law was broken, he did not inflict his tastes upon the community. I see no reason for such a sentence.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
uncle-ellis said:
Haha.

Dumb-ass shouldn't have imported pedo comics.

Also, looking through the comments in this topic,
Stop defending him!

I'm all for freedom of speech, information, ect, ect, But seriously?
This guy imported CHILD PORN! He went out of his way to import pictures of CHILDREN HAVING SEX!
Why wouldn't I defend him? He is being sent to PRISON when I see no evidence of a CRIME.

If you can explain, clearly for my sake, precisely what he did is a crime and WHY I'd be thankful. As I already pointed out, child pornography is generally illegal because it is considered harmful to the children depicted therein. Obscenity is only a crime if the population at large is asked to endure it. He kept his collection private and the sex acts were being depicted by hand drawn characters. Unless we are suddenly going to protect the rights of non-existant beings and protest punish a theoritical future breach of the law there I see no grounds for this conviction.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Eclectic Dreck said:
uncle-ellis said:
Haha.

Dumb-ass shouldn't have imported pedo comics.

Also, looking through the comments in this topic,
Stop defending him!

I'm all for freedom of speech, information, ect, ect, But seriously?
This guy imported CHILD PORN! He went out of his way to import pictures of CHILDREN HAVING SEX!
Why wouldn't I defend him? He is being sent to PRISON when I see no evidence of a CRIME.

If you can explain, clearly for my sake, precisely what he did is a crime and WHY I'd be thankful. As I already pointed out, child pornography is generally illegal because it is considered harmful to the children depicted therein. Obscenity is only a crime if the population at large is asked to endure it. He kept his collection private and the sex acts were being depicted by hand drawn characters. Unless we are suddenly going to protect the rights of non-existant beings and protest punish a theoritical future breach of the law there I see no grounds for this conviction.
Don't forget that there is generally no way to pinpoint the age of characters in drawings.

Most anime protests that its characters are all over 18 :p.

Technically if the gal on the first page of this thread is pedo then I know at least one Japanese Foreign Exchange student that was at my highschool that was pedo bait at 18 years of age :p (She looks unusually young for her age even now).