I know, right? That's why I hate them.DrunkWithPower said:WAIT, so Activision told Sony to lower it's prices... yet they raise theirs? Hypocrites.
I know, right? That's why I hate them.DrunkWithPower said:WAIT, so Activision told Sony to lower it's prices... yet they raise theirs? Hypocrites.
Because we're too proud of the pound. It has the Queen, Charles Darwin, and some other people I don't know of. The Euro is for countries who don't have any famous people to put on their money.Citrus Insanity said:I've never understood why England can't just convert to the euro
That's what I thought too.scnj said:Wow. Activision truly have taken EA's place, huh?
Very good point, now I hate them even more.DrunkWithPower said:WAIT, so Activision told Sony to lower it's prices... yet they raise theirs? Hypocrites.
Games were $50 each in 1985, and until this generation they were STILL $50. They completely ignore inflation for 20 years, and when they move prices everyone freaks out. I don't understand jacking them up to $90, but the hike to $60 was well within reason all things considered. The development costs might have gone up, but the cost of a disc is so low that they can't really claim distribution as a reason.CakeDragon said:It's not as if games are expensive enough already........
Activision =/= Activision-Blizzard. How do I know? Prototype.Brotherofwill said:Mental note: Never buy from Activision ever again. Okay...maybe Diablo 3 but that's about it.
Yes, but in 1985 only a very few select people bought videogames. Today videogames are mainstream so there is a much larger market = more revenue.asinann said:Games were $50 each in 1985, and until this generation they were STILL $50. They completely ignore inflation for 20 years, and when they move prices everyone freaks out. I don't understand jacking them up to $90, but the hike to $60 was well within reason all things considered. The development costs might have gone up, but the cost of a disc is so low that they can't really claim distribution as a reason.
Doesn't matter. I just don't want to support them after all. If you buy a Blizzard game they get money, so in the end it doesn't matter if the game is good or not. I just can't resist to buy D3...been waiting for ages.Abedeus said:Activision =/= Activision-Blizzard. How do I know? Prototype.Brotherofwill said:Mental note: Never buy from Activision ever again. Okay...maybe Diablo 3 but that's about it.
Blizzard always supports their games, even... 8 years after release.
Activision doesn't support single-player games at all.
Not to be picky, but it's the UK as a while you mean rather than EnglandCitrus Insanity said:I've never understood why England can't just convert to the euro, but this is a crappy turn of events for them nonetheless.
Well, didn't Yahtzee buy Mirrors Edge for 100 Australian dollars? I mean that's like 86 US dollars, not far from 100.xmetatr0nx said:It makes me wonder how far it will go. Will we see a $100 game in the future? I certainly hope not. With the rise in popularity of video games there is to be an expected mark up but there is a point where a line is crossed and it back fires.
Oh and we won't switch to the euro cause we want to stay with the pound, Why don't u all switch to the pound.chimmers said:Not to be picky, but it's the UK as a while you mean rather than EnglandCitrus Insanity said:I've never understood why England can't just convert to the euro, but this is a crappy turn of events for them nonetheless.
yes i have no job been looking for 2 years and yet i can manage to get a maximum 1 game per year....halo wars CE was a killer...CakeDragon said:It's not as if games are expensive enough already........