Higher Game Prices Coming to the U.K.

Outamyhead

New member
Feb 25, 2009
381
0
0
decimal value is the same as what I'm now paying in the states pretty much, although it is a blatant cheek for Activision to do that, now all the other publishers will follow suit, thinking that's fine.
 

Octorok

New member
May 28, 2009
1,461
0
0
Good Jesus! Fifty. Five. Fucking. Quid?? Currently, really expensive games that are brand new go up to about 45, which is steep in itself. But 55 is just ridiculous. Dead Rising 2 is brand new, but according to Amazon, comes in at 30 pounds. Even AC2 and L4D2 are only 40. But Modern Warfare is still at 45 quid... I bet that they won't put it up over the half century. That would be nucking futs.
 

BloodRed Pixel

New member
Jul 16, 2009
630
0
0
there are some really interesting looking games from independent developers just coming up, dead cheap!
and Penumbra Collection (1-3) is 4UKP this weekend. It doesn get any better.
 

Andy_Panthro

Man of Science
May 3, 2009
514
0
0
Hmm...

I guess some folks might start doing more gaming on their PCs.

PC games usually cost less than console game on release (for the same game) and will reduce in price more quickly.

Example, I got Fallout 3 for £17.99 a few months after it was released, and could of got it for £19.99 a couple of weeks after release (GAME "game of the week" offer)

I pre-ordered Dragon Age: Origins from Play.com for £26.99 (XBox + PS3 £39.99)

Cheap as chips.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Citrus Insanity said:
I've never understood why England can't just convert to the euro,
The Euro is a dodgy currency that's far more unstable than the pound. That and we don't want Germany controlling our exchange rate.
 

kspiess

New member
May 19, 2009
15
0
0
No way I'd spend $90 USD on a game.

And citing raising development costs seems somewhat lame. No one forced them to raise their development costs. It is possible to make a good game with 'only' 40 million instead of 60 million.
 

ChromeAlchemist

New member
Aug 21, 2008
5,865
0
0
Umm...yay?
xmetatr0nx said:
It makes me wonder how far it will go. Will we see a $100 game in the future? I certainly hope not. With the rise in popularity of video games there is to be an expected mark up but there is a point where a line is crossed and it back fires.
Considering the higher manufacturing cost of each new medium (besides CDs, that's the exception) it can only get worse, can't it? It depends on how high a jump there will be in processing power and what storage medium is adopted in the future.

But this was a mixture of hyperbole and telling us stuff we already knew. Who actually thought that the development cost of games this generation was the same as the last?

To be honest though, it shouldn't affect Amazon too much, nor Steam. So as far as I'm concerned they can kiss my sack and fornicate themselves with a barbed wire bat.

EDIT: I just realised he meant higher dev cost on this game in particular. My views still stand.
 

tk1989

New member
May 20, 2008
865
0
0
This is complete bullshit. £40 was extortionate enough as it was, but £55?!?! that is complete shit. I am sure that stores will lower the prices to closer to £40, but this is still ridiculous!
 

dekkarax

New member
Apr 3, 2008
1,213
0
0
Lord Krunk said:
Silly Brits... if Australia can handle those prices, so can you!
I agree, it's not a real problem, if people don't like it, they could always buy it when it gets cheaper...or if they want to annoy Activision, they could buy it pre-owned.
 

Low Key

New member
May 7, 2009
2,503
0
0
If you UK gamers had NTSC consoles, it would be cheaper to ask one of us Americans to buy the game (FYI, Oregon and Montana have the lowest sales tax) and ship it to you. It would only come to $72. It might take a while to get there though...probably as long as it takes for the PAL version to be released.

Strange how that is cheaper, yet the game publishers are mass producing the discs so they can sell millions.
 

Akihiko

Raincoat Killer
Aug 21, 2008
952
0
0
Well, if Activision wanted to lose customers, they're definitely going about it the right way. People can barely afford £40 in the current recession, raising that to £55 is just going to make even less people buy the game, as quite frankly they can't afford it.

To be frank, the best fitting word for this is bullshit. They state the pound is weak? Yeah, fair play that this year it has dropped a fair bit in terms of value, however it's still strong comparing to the majority of the currencies in the world. Hell it's still way stronger than the USD, if the currency being weak was the cause of this, then why in the world aren't games costing $90 in America too... Plus, if it was the increasing price of development costs, then again, why doesn't the game cost $90 in America, and other countries too to account for that price rise? Or even, just don't spend as much money on development... I've known brilliant games to be released from developers who have spent very little money on it's development.

Fortunately, I wasn't intending on buying MW2 anyway, however, they've got my word, I ain't paying £55 for ANY of their games. It's daylight robbery.
 

Low Key

New member
May 7, 2009
2,503
0
0
Akihiko said:
Well, if Activision wanted to lose customers, they're definitely going about it the right way. People can barely afford £40 in the current recession, raising that to £55 is just going to make even less people buy the game, as quite frankly they can't afford it.

To be frank, the best fitting word for this is bullshit. They state the pound is weak? Yeah, fair play that this year it has dropped a fair bit in terms of value, however it's still strong comparing to the majority of the currencies in the world. Hell it's still way stronger than the USD, if the currency being weak was the cause of this, then why in the world aren't games costing $90 in America too... Plus, if it was the increasing price of development costs, then again, why doesn't the game cost $90 in America, and other countries too to account for that price rise? Or even, just don't spend as much money on development... I've known brilliant games to be released from developers who have spent very little money on it's development.

Fortunately, I wasn't intending on buying MW2 anyway, however, they've got my word, I ain't paying £55 for ANY of their games. It's daylight robbery.
America buys more games than the rest of the world combined. Game prices went up to $60-$70 from $40-$50 when the 360 and PS3 came out. That's about $11billion from first release. At the current £40, only $5billion was made.

I don't agree with the price increase at all, I just wanted to explain why greedy companies like Activision do what they do. They see everyone as a statistic. Dare I call it price fixing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_fixing]?