I thought it was "let he who didn't wear Hammer pants cast the first stone."Happyninja42 said:As Harry Dresden put it when commenting about Molly's outfit to her father. "Let he who has never stone washed his jeans, cast the first stone."
Newp, it was "stone washed jeans" in the book. Continuing the "stoning" reference. xD Or well, at least that's what he said in Proven Guilty. He might have made a Hammer Pants comment in another book or short story and I just don't remember it.Something Amyss said:I thought it was "let he who didn't wear Hammer pants cast the first stone."Happyninja42 said:As Harry Dresden put it when commenting about Molly's outfit to her father. "Let he who has never stone washed his jeans, cast the first stone."
Same idea, though.
Most people probably have done exactly that, though, and I don't really care who hasn't because that's where the "hipster" thing comes in in the first place. That "here first" territorialism is exactly what the OP mocked. I used to joke about fellow Nine Inch Nails fans because being a fan since Halo 1 was such a big deal to them. The resulting jokes with my friends were about how I knew I loved NiN from Halo 0, or how I loved the first single 15 minutes before it was recorded.
And I think I have a pretty good excuse. I was 9 when "Down In It" was released.
As a parallel, I can say a lot of bad things about ICP, but I've never had a Juggalo care that I wasn't "down with the clown" since the first record, or that I only really ever cared for two of the albums in the first place. Or that I still mock "Miracles."
I can, however, safely say I never touched grunge. The less said about what I was actually into, the better. >.>
To be fair, it's never been about the people that admit they know nothing and want to learn(like most people). But the people that waltz in and act like they know everything in a fandom when they actually don't. Nobody likes bandwagoners, and for good reason, there's a good chance people will drop off the moment it becomes inconvenient to them. And something being seen as previously unpopular sorta has a habit of attracting annoyances.Eclipse Dragon said:Likewise, I've only very recently been introduced to the board game scene at my local comic book shop, I was not shunned for my lack of knowledge in everything board game related, they welcomed me with open arms and were more than happy to explain how to play.
As someone that sorta did...and was a nerd(and to a point still do because it's simpler to have a handful of buddies and people that know you than have a bunch of people think you're approachable with their problems you probably have either no interest in or ability to help with)...I don't think it's so much revisionist so much as you not wanting to acknowledge other people's opinions and experiences...Misericorde said:Nerds didn't want to be shunned, they coped with being shunned the best way they could. Lets not engage in any revisionist history.
Doesn't it, though? Yeah, it sets up a wall around "real nerds" but the people that are included in that walled area often exhibit traits that are usually seen as much more severe drawbacks in wider society than they are within that specific circle. You are probably less likely to be made the butt of a joke about being overweight and socially awkward by the members of your shitty high-school Star Trek fanclub than you are in your regular classes (as long as you're a white, straight dude, at least). I'm not saying nerd "culture" is more accepting than society at large (far from it!) I'm just saying that they're accepting of different things, which can lead to it feeling like a safe haven for a subset of people who don't fit in with the rest of the world but do fit in with the nerd crowd. Nerd subculture might not be better than other subcultures, but at least it's about you (some you out there, at least) and people generally enjoy stuff being about or for them.Something Amyss said:Except it doesn't say that. It sets up a wall around "real nerds" and nothing else. It says nothing about acceptance (and honestly, nerd comm unity can be more exclusive and cliquey than the dreaded "jocks").Simonism451 said:if you actually happen to be socially awkward and not very attractive, it also tells you that it's okay to be those things and that there's a group of people out there who will accept you despite that.
The irony, though, is that it exemplifies hipster" behavour.
Nobody's forcing you to read my posts, sweetheart.Misericorde said:If we can all agree that it's shitty, maybe we can just stop at that and leave the rest of the post-modernist equivocation for a topic that deserves more thought?Simonism451 said:Doesn't it, though? Yeah, it sets up a wall around "real nerds" but the people that are included in that walled area often exhibit traits that are usually seen as much more severe drawbacks in wider society than they are within that specific circle. You are probably less likely to be made the butt of a joke about being overweight and socially awkward by the members of your shitty high-school Star Trek fanclub than you are in your regular classes (as long as you're a white, straight dude, at least). I'm not saying nerd "culture" is more accepting than society at large (far from it!) I'm just saying that they're accepting of different things, which can lead to it feeling like a safe haven for a subset of people who don't fit in with the rest of the world but do fit in with the nerd crowd. Nerd subculture might not be better than other subcultures, but at least it's about you (some you out there, at least) and people generally enjoy stuff being about or for them.Something Amyss said:Except it doesn't say that. It sets up a wall around "real nerds" and nothing else. It says nothing about acceptance (and honestly, nerd comm unity can be more exclusive and cliquey than the dreaded "jocks").Simonism451 said:if you actually happen to be socially awkward and not very attractive, it also tells you that it's okay to be those things and that there's a group of people out there who will accept you despite that.
The irony, though, is that it exemplifies hipster" behavour.
Is it silly, selfish and does it make gatekeeping okay? Yes, yes and no, obviously. However, it does make a bit of subjective sense of the resistance to opening the hobby up to everybody (meaning cool people/people I disagree with)
So true. Those words work in a surprisingly similar fashion. Call a friend or someone who shares your hobby a "nerd" and he'll nod and laugh, but if don't fit the nerd label, and you call someone a "nerd" expect to get into a fight, or at least an argument.Strazdas said:Saying "nerd culture" is like saying "****** culture".
The same type of people is it? Maybe that's where the well deserved animosity is from. Judging people based on utterly superficial traits and assuming they are the same. Assuming that they could not have been interested before. A bunch of whining about their past doesn't excuse their actions towards people they never met before in the least. It's a childish way of thinking and adults that act immaturely like that get well deserved scorn.Redryhno said:Hell, a large part of nerdom was shunned for the things they like and now they're shunned because they were apprehensive over the things they love becoming popular and bringing in the EXACT same type of people that threw their action figures against the school walls and made fun of their shirts.
Oh boo fucking hoo. If they can't grow up and recognize the difference between people from their past and new people and carry a chip on their shoulder over it then they're a bunch of children. I don't see why decent people should tolerate others stubbornly clinging to having the emotional maturity of a tomato.Then of course there's the "pretty" factor in that there's actually universally attractive "nerds" now that weren't shamed for their looks. There's alot of resentment from old-schoolers, because not only were they brow-beaten as kids, they're now being brow-beaten as adults in the things they took solace in. And they're being told to accept unconditionally, something that wasn't extended to them for most of their lives in the fandoms.
Nitpicking/gatekeeping happens in every culture. As I mentioned, music culture does it too. IMO even worse.Misericorde said:If we can all agree that it's shitty, maybe we can just stop at that and leave the rest of the post-modernist equivocation for a topic that deserves more thought?Simonism451 said:Doesn't it, though? Yeah, it sets up a wall around "real nerds" but the people that are included in that walled area often exhibit traits that are usually seen as much more severe drawbacks in wider society than they are within that specific circle. You are probably less likely to be made the butt of a joke about being overweight and socially awkward by the members of your shitty high-school Star Trek fanclub than you are in your regular classes (as long as you're a white, straight dude, at least). I'm not saying nerd "culture" is more accepting than society at large (far from it!) I'm just saying that they're accepting of different things, which can lead to it feeling like a safe haven for a subset of people who don't fit in with the rest of the world but do fit in with the nerd crowd. Nerd subculture might not be better than other subcultures, but at least it's about you (some you out there, at least) and people generally enjoy stuff being about or for them.Something Amyss said:Except it doesn't say that. It sets up a wall around "real nerds" and nothing else. It says nothing about acceptance (and honestly, nerd comm unity can be more exclusive and cliquey than the dreaded "jocks").Simonism451 said:if you actually happen to be socially awkward and not very attractive, it also tells you that it's okay to be those things and that there's a group of people out there who will accept you despite that.
The irony, though, is that it exemplifies hipster" behavour.
Is it silly, selfish and does it make gatekeeping okay? Yes, yes and no, obviously. However, it does make a bit of subjective sense of the resistance to opening the hobby up to everybody (meaning cool people/people I disagree with)
No, it's just that everyone is already through the gate now, and the gatekeepers are alone in a crowd. I feel badly for them, but they're the ones who were NOT unfairly treated like social outcasts.RaikuFA said:HIIIIIIPPSSSSSTTTTEEEEEERRRRRSSSSS!!! RAGE!!! SMASH!!! DESTROY!!!
*ahem* Sorry about that. I really hate hipsters. But I'll say what I said about "fake nerd girls": let them do what they want. They'll fuck up eventuality. Let the gatekeeping come naturally. Hipsters already do gatekeeping with music (part of why I made that music thread.) Don't stoop to their level.
It's not about your skin, or your hobbies, or your friends. It's about shit like thinking "Nerd" means anything special and that you have a right to watch people like hawks for a fuckup. Nitpicking is the dark, ugly side of nerds everywhere.
My point was that people are all superficial shits to some degree or another, and when someone gets judged for superficial crap for a large part of their life, quit throwing a fit when that person starts doing some of the same stuff. Let them have their corner and grumble under their breath, they'll either change their minds, or they won't. Don't bother them, they probably won't bother you.Secondhand Revenant said:The same type of people is it? Maybe that's where the well deserved animosity is from. Judging people based on utterly superficial traits and assuming they are the same. Assuming that they could not have been interested before. A bunch of whining about their past doesn't excuse their actions towards people they never met before in the least. It's a childish way of thinking and adults that act immaturely like that get well deserved scorn.Redryhno said:Hell, a large part of nerdom was shunned for the things they like and now they're shunned because they were apprehensive over the things they love becoming popular and bringing in the EXACT same type of people that threw their action figures against the school walls and made fun of their shirts.
Oh boo fucking hoo. If they can't grow up and recognize the difference between people from their past and new people and carry a chip on their shoulder over it then they're a bunch of children. I don't see why decent people should tolerate others stubbornly clinging to having the emotional maturity of a tomato.Then of course there's the "pretty" factor in that there's actually universally attractive "nerds" now that weren't shamed for their looks. There's alot of resentment from old-schoolers, because not only were they brow-beaten as kids, they're now being brow-beaten as adults in the things they took solace in. And they're being told to accept unconditionally, something that wasn't extended to them for most of their lives in the fandoms.
Haha where the hell do you live that calling someone a nerd will get you into a fight? Nowadays someone would be more likely to think of it as a largely neutral descriptor, I've called strangers or recent acquaintances nerd or nerdy before, not a fight or argument among those instances, several have taken it as a compliment within the last couple years.sageoftruth said:So true. Those words work in a surprisingly similar fashion. Call a friend or someone who shares your hobby a "nerd" and he'll nod and laugh, but if don't fit the nerd label, and you call someone a "nerd" expect to get into a fight, or at least an argument.Strazdas said:Saying "nerd culture" is like saying "****** culture".
Ok...if you say that's what I'm doing, that must be what I"m doing, because as you know, someone saying that's not what they're doing means they must be doing exactly what someone else says they're doing.Secondhand Revenant said:No you failed to really indict everyone as being such. You're just defending it for a bunch of people who apparently refuse to grow up and carry a chip on their shoulder like a 5 year old. I loathe jackasses who try to excuse their behavior because someone was mean to them in the past. It's the height of childish behavior, I despise intellectual laziness like that. And their corner apparently encompasses more than just themselves so if they fuck off to a desert island, cool, but that doesn't seem to be what they do or we wouldn't encounter themRedryhno said:My point was that people are all superficial shits to some degree or another, and when someone gets judged for superficial crap for a large part of their life, quit throwing a fit when that person starts doing some of the same stuff. Let them have their corner and grumble under their breath, they'll either change their minds, or they won't. Don't bother them, they probably won't bother you.Secondhand Revenant said:The same type of people is it? Maybe that's where the well deserved animosity is from. Judging people based on utterly superficial traits and assuming they are the same. Assuming that they could not have been interested before. A bunch of whining about their past doesn't excuse their actions towards people they never met before in the least. It's a childish way of thinking and adults that act immaturely like that get well deserved scorn.Redryhno said:Hell, a large part of nerdom was shunned for the things they like and now they're shunned because they were apprehensive over the things they love becoming popular and bringing in the EXACT same type of people that threw their action figures against the school walls and made fun of their shirts.
Oh boo fucking hoo. If they can't grow up and recognize the difference between people from their past and new people and carry a chip on their shoulder over it then they're a bunch of children. I don't see why decent people should tolerate others stubbornly clinging to having the emotional maturity of a tomato.Then of course there's the "pretty" factor in that there's actually universally attractive "nerds" now that weren't shamed for their looks. There's alot of resentment from old-schoolers, because not only were they brow-beaten as kids, they're now being brow-beaten as adults in the things they took solace in. And they're being told to accept unconditionally, something that wasn't extended to them for most of their lives in the fandoms.
Hell, if they don't act like they know better than them when they really don't and they'll probably be quite a bit more amicable. That's pretty much all my post was talking about. I think you read far too much that you wanted there buddy.
No I'm reading your lame excuses for their behavior aside from that stuff about not knowing better. If it were just the not knowing better junk I'd roll my eyes and not bother to reply, simply disagreeing with your assessment of the problem. I responded because I don't care for the BS excuses for some people being emotionally retarded and acting like 5 year olds, holding grudges against people who did nothing.
Yup because telling people to leave them alone isn't at all meant as a defense! Starting the pity party for the oh so emotionally damaged nerds isn't meant to try and defend them at all! "Let them have their corner" is not a defense. Really! Because you say so!Redryhno said:Ok...if you say that's what I'm doing, that must be what I"m doing, because as you know, someone saying that's not what they're doing means they must be doing exactly what someone else says they're doing.Secondhand Revenant said:No you failed to really indict everyone as being such. You're just defending it for a bunch of people who apparently refuse to grow up and carry a chip on their shoulder like a 5 year old. I loathe jackasses who try to excuse their behavior because someone was mean to them in the past. It's the height of childish behavior, I despise intellectual laziness like that. And their corner apparently encompasses more than just themselves so if they fuck off to a desert island, cool, but that doesn't seem to be what they do or we wouldn't encounter themRedryhno said:My point was that people are all superficial shits to some degree or another, and when someone gets judged for superficial crap for a large part of their life, quit throwing a fit when that person starts doing some of the same stuff. Let them have their corner and grumble under their breath, they'll either change their minds, or they won't. Don't bother them, they probably won't bother you.Secondhand Revenant said:The same type of people is it? Maybe that's where the well deserved animosity is from. Judging people based on utterly superficial traits and assuming they are the same. Assuming that they could not have been interested before. A bunch of whining about their past doesn't excuse their actions towards people they never met before in the least. It's a childish way of thinking and adults that act immaturely like that get well deserved scorn.Redryhno said:Hell, a large part of nerdom was shunned for the things they like and now they're shunned because they were apprehensive over the things they love becoming popular and bringing in the EXACT same type of people that threw their action figures against the school walls and made fun of their shirts.
Oh boo fucking hoo. If they can't grow up and recognize the difference between people from their past and new people and carry a chip on their shoulder over it then they're a bunch of children. I don't see why decent people should tolerate others stubbornly clinging to having the emotional maturity of a tomato.Then of course there's the "pretty" factor in that there's actually universally attractive "nerds" now that weren't shamed for their looks. There's alot of resentment from old-schoolers, because not only were they brow-beaten as kids, they're now being brow-beaten as adults in the things they took solace in. And they're being told to accept unconditionally, something that wasn't extended to them for most of their lives in the fandoms.
Hell, if they don't act like they know better than them when they really don't and they'll probably be quite a bit more amicable. That's pretty much all my post was talking about. I think you read far too much that you wanted there buddy.
No I'm reading your lame excuses for their behavior aside from that stuff about not knowing better. If it were just the not knowing better junk I'd roll my eyes and not bother to reply, simply disagreeing with your assessment of the problem. I responded because I don't care for the BS excuses for some people being emotionally retarded and acting like 5 year olds, holding grudges against people who did nothing.
Toodle pip.
Dude, I think you really need to step back and calm down here a bit...because it was not meant as a defense, it was meant as advice, because if someone is grumbling and not bothering anyone beyond that, stop giving a shit, because it's a waste of time to try to "correct" them.Secondhand Revenant said:Yup because telling people to leave them alone isn't at all meant as a defense! Starting the pity party for the oh so emotionally damaged nerds isn't meant to try and defend them at all! "Let them have their corner" is not a defense. Really! Because you say so!
You never denied it anyways and you continued to defend them. You utterly failed to realize which part of your post mine was addressing and told me the point of your post as a whole, which I really didn't care about. I cared about the nonsense you were spouting while getting to your point.