The meaning of the word 'Terrorist' has been perverted to mean anyone who acts against governmental law whether just or unjust.BlackWidower said:How exactly does this fall under the purview of Homeland Security? Are the sites being run by ter'rists?
Some of the sites had counterfeit merchandise? How did they know? If it was counterfeit, why go through all this crap, couldn't they just charge them with fraud? Unless they say it's counterfeit, and if that's the case, who gives a shit?!
That is amazing, thank you for posting that.Souplex said:I think Jack Black put it best:
Shouldn't that be "Homeland security seizes dozens of copyrights infringing websites"?Tom Goldman said:Homeland Security Seizes Dozens of Piracy Websites
You write well. I'll hazard a guess here - you don't live in the U.S.Bretty said:With IP moderation and tracking in the US now I am surprised the country who spouts privacy and individualism is so heavily controlled. Irony?
Sheeple like you blow my mind you really do. You gladly sit there going ass to mouth with the big media companies eating every piece of bull shit they spew your way with a big stupid smile on your face and don't seem to care that they are using their money to buy off politicians in order to bring the internet in the US to something on par with what China and Iran currently have. . . . But hey if it stops some 15 yr old from getting a few free songs who cares about silly things like rights.Cryo84R said:Can we start putting pirates in prison yet?
Please?
That's an interesting angle. Change the dialogue from an illegal/legal focus to a purely economic one, like tickets for not wearing seatbelts (ignoring if that should be a ticketed offense or not).KEM10 said:It is. The idea is the same and (economically) it works. If you know of Gary Becker, this was his idea on how to end the war on drugs...well, besides making them legal and doubling the price for a joint and making the illegal sales ten times more punishable.4173 said:Isn't that the same as the arresting kids holding a couple joints, which everyone roundly mocks?KEM10 said:This action won't do much besides just informing the public it is trying something. The only way to kick piracy down is to use attack the demand portion since it costs little to form the supply. If you can build up the guilt (or fear) of the people who use the torrents it will have actual inherent costs.
In short: To significantly and quickly knock down piracy, start suing the teenagers who do it. And not just one or two, hit them like these sites.
Aw, did i suggest that maybe someone should pay for things they get? That would put a real ding in your entertainment library, wouldn't it?Xanthious said:Sheeple like you blow my mind you really do. You gladly sit there going ass to mouth with the big media companies eating every piece of bull shit they spew your way with a big stupid smile on your face and don't seem to care that they are using their money to buy off politicians in order to bring the internet in the US to something on par with what China and Iran currently have. . . . But hey if it stops some 15 yr old from getting a few free songs who cares about silly things like rights.Cryo84R said:Can we start putting pirates in prison yet?
Please?