They're fun in games, but I think in reality, as few people as possible should own them.
They seem to cause more problems than they solve.
They seem to cause more problems than they solve.
sorry? im silly for not assuming that the US is on the verge of declaring a dictatorship where Obama is going to round up and kill any political enemies and groups he doesnt happen to like. how very retarded of me!CanHasDIY said:How silly... I can name another society that didn't think an armed populus was a good idea... the Nazi's. One of the first things Hitler did was round up all the guns, so the citizens couldn't defend themselves against his armies.spartandude said:You guys can say its for self defence and that if there were more restrictions on guns criminals would still get them because they brake the law any way and blahh blah blah
compare the amount of gun murders from the USA to places like UK, France, Austrailia, Canada and such, you know thet places with gun restrictions and suddenly America doesnt look so good
As for criminals, lemme drop a little knowledge on ya - if someone has the intent to kill, they're gonna do it, whether by gun or sword of bomb... take the Tucson shooting for example. As a result a lot of the busy-bodies in this country are calling for a handgun ban. Personally, I would much rather be assaulted by someone with a handgun than, say, a high-powered hunting rifle... at least with the pistol they would have to get within sight range; the rifle shot you may never hear coming, a la the D.C. sniper incident. Not to mention, had the shooter been unable to acquire a firearm, who's to say that he wouldn't have throw together an incendiary device, which would have had a much greater area of affect, thus causing greater damage?
As the saying goes, an armed society is a polite society. Makes me glad I live in the "concealed-carry and proud of it" Midwest.
Yeah,but in the UK the police don't have guns (excluding SWAT and the like) last I checked we we'ren't run by criminalsUltratwinkie said:EllEzDee said:Why does a police officer need a gun? So they can kill people? I think the number of videos of American cops shooting unarmed civilians demonstrates this perfectly. If civies didn't have guns, there'd be absolutely no reason for a cop to have one. (Obviously not including specialist teams like SWAT)Armyguy0 said:Cops with guns = stupid why?EllEzDee said:Civilians and cops with guns = stupid.
Criminals have guns, and the police don't have guns = A criminal run area.
See the problem here?
The picture alone describes the amount of fail i read in that post.
and yet look at Australia's crim rate (including gun crime) compared to americaobscurumlux01 said:@ Azrael the Cat:
Australia, the country founded by the scum of the old-world Europe? All the liars, rapists, murderers, molesters, and con-artists? Really? You want me to believe that we give a rat's ass about you being all self-righteous with that kind of lineage?
*laughs* Right...and Yahtzee is a really NICE guy once you get to know him, right?
@ Topic
I'd love to get a gun, just too cheap to actually BUY one. Meh, there's always a knife and the much more visceral thrill of making sure that whoever messes with you will feel as much pain as you want to inflict before they finally die from their injuries. Yeah, and plus no stupid concealed carry crap necessary.
That seems all well and good about using a tazer, but at some point a firearm might be needed. My dad had a friend (an alcoholic, a bull of a man) who started punching the hell out of a cop who was trying to take him in for driving drunk. It took two cops all unloading their tazers at full voltage to finally take him down.Ham_authority95 said:Besides self-defense, hunting, and war, I don't see the point of them. My family has 3 of them, including a magnum right next my parents' bed.
When I start living alone, I'll probably just get a Tazer. Guns aren't fun for me to shoot, plus a Tazer would do away with all the nasty killing business if I never needed to defend myself.
Don't ask me about my opinions on gun laws because I couldn't give less of a shit about those.
A) what country are you from, he who pretends to know more about my country's history that I? I never said tyrannical oppression was just around the corner, but rather that the Second Amendment exists to prevent it... Sheesh... talk about only hearing what you want to...spartandude said:sorry? im silly for not assuming that the US is on the verge of declaring a dictatorship where Obama is going to round up and kill any political enemies and groups he doesnt happen to like. how very retarded of me!
as for your second point. i imagine it would be difficult to get hand gun let alone a high powered hunting rifle if guns were banned or had much tighter restrictions about carrying them and using them.
and im not going to deny that gun crime is going to dissapear if guns were more restricted but if other countries are any indication it would significantly reduce
btw im not 100% sure but if hitler and nazis get mentioned in an argument on the internet then shouldnt this be ending soon? thank god im sick of replying to the half-wits here
In France, guns are only allowed for hunting. You can't buy a shotgun or a desert eagle or something non-hunty.macfluffers said:PS- France's gun ownership rate is 23%. America? 25%. Yeah, such a huge difference. /sarcasm
How exactly is that 'false in every way?'Gentle Dementia said:I'm divided. I know society would be better without them ("illegal guns means only criminals have guns" is false in every way). But on the other hand, I want one!
So you believe that guns could stop gun crimes? Now I don't follow everything that happens in the news in USA, but when was the last time someone managed to kill/ incapacitate a potential murderer with a gun before the murderer managed to physically harm anyone else?danpascooch said:many of the deadly shootings such as the recent one at Arizona could probably have suffered a lower body count if someone at the scene had a gun, and used it to stop the shooter.
a) i was merely saying how wrong of me it was not to compare AS YOU DID a gun free america to same as Nazi Germany!CanHasDIY said:A) what country are you from, he who pretends to know more about my country's history that I? I never said tyrannical oppression was just around the corner, but rather that the Second Amendment exists to prevent it... Sheesh... talk about only hearing what you want to...spartandude said:sorry? im silly for not assuming that the US is on the verge of declaring a dictatorship where Obama is going to round up and kill any political enemies and groups he doesnt happen to like. how very retarded of me!
as for your second point. i imagine it would be difficult to get hand gun let alone a high powered hunting rifle if guns were banned or had much tighter restrictions about carrying them and using them.
and im not going to deny that gun crime is going to dissapear if guns were more restricted but if other countries are any indication it would significantly reduce
btw im not 100% sure but if hitler and nazis get mentioned in an argument on the internet then shouldnt this be ending soon? thank god im sick of replying to the half-wits here
B) like I said, if guns are banned then those with intent to kill will find other methods, likely using explosives... but hey, maybe that's what you're going for.
C) just because a country has a low rate of gun crime doesn't make it Paradise. Look at China, they have a standing weapons ban AND one of the worst human rights records in history. Then again, maybe that is paradise to you - a land where Big Brother makes all your decisions for you, undesirables are removed from society... is that the kind of world you want?
D) if you can't make your point without childish insults, you have no point to make.
Shotguns are mainly for hunting. Most police and military models are adapted from hunting models. That said, I've heard that you can buy non-hunting firearms, but I could be mistaken.d4rkxy13x said:In France, guns are only allowed for hunting. You can't buy a shotgun or a desert eagle or something non-hunty.macfluffers said:PS- France's gun ownership rate is 23%. America? 25%. Yeah, such a huge difference. /sarcasm
It happens all the time.Knusper said:So you believe that guns could stop gun crimes? Now I don't follow everything that happens in the news in USA, but when was the last time someone managed to kill/ incapacitate a potential murderer with a gun before the murderer managed to physically harm anyone else?
That sort of language gets us nowhere. Besides, by saying "gun nuts" and calling people on the anti-gun control side of the debate unintelligent, you are flaming, and therefore a hypocrite.spartandude said:d)fair enough i should not have used childish insulte, and yes i do have a point to make, im just waiting till one of you gun nuts actually becomes inteligent and open minded to examine another person's argument and not imediately flame them for having a different opinion to yours
Lucky your dad's friend didn't have a gun.th3xile said:That seems all well and good about using a tazer, but at some point a firearm might be needed. My dad had a friend (an alcoholic, a bull of a man) who started punching the hell out of a cop who was trying to take him in for driving drunk. It took two cops all unloading their tazers at full voltage to finally take him down.Ham_authority95 said:Besides self-defense, hunting, and war, I don't see the point of them. My family has 3 of them, including a magnum right next my parents' bed.
When I start living alone, I'll probably just get a Tazer. Guns aren't fun for me to shoot, plus a Tazer would do away with all the nasty killing business if I never needed to defend myself.
Don't ask me about my opinions on gun laws because I couldn't give less of a shit about those.