Don't put words in my collective sex's mouth please.emeraldrafael said:Plus they do threesomes sometimes, which is a plus in any case for some guys.
I found threesomes to be the worst kind of sex possible.
Ick.
Don't put words in my collective sex's mouth please.emeraldrafael said:Plus they do threesomes sometimes, which is a plus in any case for some guys.
yeah.... I'm not retracting my statement.AccursedTheory said:Don't put words in my collective sex's mouth please.emeraldrafael said:Plus they do threesomes sometimes, which is a plus in any case for some guys.
I found threesomes to be the worst kind of sex possible.
Ick.
I could have swore you said every...emeraldrafael said:yeah.... I'm not retracting my statement.AccursedTheory said:Don't put words in my collective sex's mouth please.emeraldrafael said:Plus they do threesomes sometimes, which is a plus in any case for some guys.
I found threesomes to be the worst kind of sex possible.
Ick.
I wasnt saying all guys, I was refering to the specific guy she's dating. Who does enjoy Threesomes. Dont be so assumptuous.
No, I said in any case, which meant in any thing you can say about the relationship my friend is having. Cause thats all he's ever said when I brought up negatives that other people tell me to tell her.AccursedTheory said:I could have swore you said every...emeraldrafael said:yeah.... I'm not retracting my statement.AccursedTheory said:Don't put words in my collective sex's mouth please.emeraldrafael said:Plus they do threesomes sometimes, which is a plus in any case for some guys.
I found threesomes to be the worst kind of sex possible.
Ick.
I wasnt saying all guys, I was refering to the specific guy she's dating. Who does enjoy Threesomes. Dont be so assumptuous.
I must be losing it... my bad.
Definining it by attraction to one sex or the other is an artificial constraint, though. It's really no more accurate than defining anything other than sexuality as an act of deviance or a disease.Cgull said:Surely if we're bound to be fixed by the idea of sexuality (as apparently we all are), which is defined, usually, by whether you are attracted to your own or the opposite gender, surely desiring both at the same time (potentially) falls outside of that, essentially breaking the mould (surely a good thing?).
If I've read that right then I think I actually agree with you, I'm straight by definition, but I hate that the need to define it exists in the first place.Zachary Amaranth said:Definining it by attraction to one sex or the other is an artificial constraint, though. It's really no more accurate than defining anything other than sexuality as an act of deviance or a disease.Cgull said:Surely if we're bound to be fixed by the idea of sexuality (as apparently we all are), which is defined, usually, by whether you are attracted to your own or the opposite gender, surely desiring both at the same time (potentially) falls outside of that, essentially breaking the mould (surely a good thing?).
Obviously not the SAME, mind, but It's a constraint which is demonstrably not the case.
Most intelligent phrase used in this thread so far.Jarl said:What goes on in my mind? Probably the same that goes on in yours.
Of all the stupid threads on these forums....
It's the ability to be able to be romantically and sexually attracted to both genders. It's not some "deviant" behaviour, it's exactly the same and gay or straight, only both. I mean, how do you explain homosexuals? You fucking don't!