How do you feel about PC games that require Steam installed?

Recommended Videos

Skobvs

New member
Nov 26, 2009
258
0
0
As long as the game is a good one and you don't plan to return it after you play it, steam is great! This is why I always test a game on a mates pc (usually someone will have it) before I buy it.
 

masher

New member
Jul 20, 2009
745
0
0
Steam has great customer support and feedback. My account was hacked, and within 24 hours or less, I was happy, playing TF2, and cursing the life of that hacking bastard. Steam/Valve listen to you, and that's great! Plus, there's a sale like every week. I love Steam! XD
 

Catalyst6

Dapper Fellow
Apr 21, 2010
1,359
0
0
Almost all of my games are through Steam, so I suppose I'm just so used to it. I really do like having a persistent persona as well as the extra interface.

I'd say that the only problem with Steam is that you HAVE to be online to use it without jumping through a bunch of hoops. Example: My university's network blocks the ports Steam needs to start, so unless I disable the wireless on my laptop and open it offline then it won't work.

Still, it is great overall.
 

SultanP

New member
Mar 15, 2009
985
0
0
I would be bothered if it didn't usually mean no other forms of DRM, being able to play without the cd, and not having to look for patches yourself. I also like to see a list of my games, even though only a fraction of the games I own are on Steam.
 

cooluc

PC Gamer
Dec 23, 2009
57
0
0
I love steam, except one thing:
I'm forced to install all my games in the same directory. Let me explain why:
I have 2 different storage volumes: a 500 gb hard drive, used to store data and play games that require a less powerful system (This is where STEAM is installed)
A 140gb RAID0 between two Raptor drives, where windows is installed, along with the more demanding games.
Sadly, steam forces me to put all my games in the same directory, so games like crysis, DA:O, and others, I buy either boxed or from D2D
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,596
0
0
RhomCo said:
veloper said:
Most recent and worst example of this is the gold edition of DOW2. It's got the chaos expansion data on disc, but not the original DOW2. This confuses steam to the point where it will stall at 10kb/s and after a couple minutes actually crash.
You have to manually cancel all the DLs, delete all the DOW content and tell steam to DL only the first one first, to avoid this.
I had none of these problems with DoW2 Gold.

In fact the only thing that really shat me off was it using Steam for Install, DRM, and auto update but then switching to GFWL for everything else. What the fuck is up with that?
It could be a different localization. Mine's the french + UK version.
 

AWAR

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,910
0
0
I cant understand why people hate it, can someone explain this to me?
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
gold_digger22 said:
For example, in order to play Modern Warfare 2 on the PC, you need to install Steam and link your game key code to your account. Apparently it means they can't sell it later.
Well, I don't often sell my games, and they end up rotting in storage as is, so I don't mind not having a physical copy and having it accessible to reinstall, heh - and who would want to buy Modern Warfare 2 on PC now the truth about how shitty its multiplayer is on the PC?

But I can see why people hate that some games require Steam.
 

Flames66

New member
Aug 22, 2009
2,310
0
0
I'm not amazingly keen on it. I prefer the steam option to all the other DRM options because I trust valve, but I still want it on a disk that just installs.
 

ShrapnelHound

New member
Apr 21, 2010
80
0
0
I think it is a good thing, it gives people are platform to for pc games to find the games they want and new games they didnt know about, its helping to keep pc gaming alive
 

ffs-dontcare

New member
Aug 13, 2009
701
0
0
I like the games, but I hate Steam.

1 - I don't care about updating my games unless I play multiplayer or want to get rid of some pretty glaring bugs. Usually I just want to install my game and get to playing. When I installed Dawn of War 2, I was not happy to have to wait for it to update on my crappy internet connection. Nor was I happy about having to wait for games like Half-life 2 and Portal and such to finish updating when I just want to get into the single-player. I want to choose whether I update or not. Developers deserve to get paid for their work, but they (and the publishers) shouldn't get to control when I get to play and what version I play single-player with.
2 - I like to be absolutely certain that I can play my games anywhere at any time. I paid for my games, so I should be able to play them whenever I want, wherever I want.
3 - I want to be able to play my games in the future, ages from now. Even if I end up not doing so, it's great to have that option. I'm thankful to be able to play old classics like Z, C&C, Total Annihilation, Dark Reign and Duke Nukem 3D even today without having to deal with any DRM whatsoever. I want the same option with today's games. Again, I paid for it, so it's mine.

I realize that Steam has its uses if you're the sort of gamer who buys games via digital distribution, plays online regularly and perhaps just likes to update automatically on a fast-ass reliable connection, but it doesn't appeal to me personally.
 

Kingjackl

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1,041
0
0
Because of my shitty internet, I can't actually buy anything on Steam without having to leave my computer on for a week while the thing downloads. Also I don't use the community system because none of my friends use Steam. Basically, I would never install it deliberately, but if it's the only way I can play the Orange Box, then I don't mind.
 

Jekken6

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,285
0
0
I think more games shoul take adantage and piggyback on it with cloud support, autopatching, stats, etc. Then getting into a server in borderlands on PC would've been much less of a nightmare.
 

Petromir

New member
Apr 10, 2010
592
0
0
ffs-dontcare said:
I like the games, but I hate Steam.

1 - I don't care about updating my games unless I play multiplayer or want to get rid of some pretty glaring bugs. Usually I just want to install my game and get to playing. When I installed Dawn of War 2, I was not happy to have to wait for it to update on my crappy internet connection. Nor was I happy about having to wait for games like Half-life 2 and Portal and such to finish updating when I just want to get into the single-player. I want to choose whether I update or not. Developers deserve to get paid for their work, but they (and the publishers) shouldn't get to control when I get to play and what version I play single-player with.
2 - I like to be absolutely certain that I can play my games anywhere at any time. I paid for my games, so I should be able to play them whenever I want, wherever I want.
3 - I want to be able to play my games in the future, ages from now. Even if I end up not doing so, it's great to have that option. I'm thankful to be able to play old classics like Z, C&C, Total Annihilation, Dark Reign and Duke Nukem 3D even today without having to deal with any DRM whatsoever. I want the same option with today's games. Again, I paid for it, so it's mine.

I realize that Steam has its uses if you're the sort of gamer who buys games via digital distribution, plays online regularly and perhaps just likes to update automatically on a fast-ass reliable connection, but it doesn't appeal to me personally.
1. Once its installed you can prevent a game frome ever updating again, with about 3 mouse clicks. Yes it can be annoying on installing especially for a SP game. Compared to some of the set up hoops from the days of C&C and Duke Nukem 3D, this is minor.

2. You can, as long as a games already installed offline mode doesnt care where you are. Its only installing them that casues any problems, and there are ways round even that.

3. You can, and will be able to just make sure that if steam goes bust you get the patches they have released (they already have made them, they just keep updating them as time goes by just in case).


Seriously you state some pretty old skool gaming there (much of which using an original copy causes far more heartache than steam does if you try on a modern PC). For example a few years ago i managed to get an original copy of C&C working on my PC, the only problem was the processor was so overpowered that the game ended before it had finished saying transfering battlefield control. It took me about as long to sort that problem out as it did to download empire total war, when that came out a year or so later.
 

mightybozz

New member
Aug 20, 2009
177
0
0
I don't like steam. I've not got a good internet connection at home (rural area) and I can't get it on my university network. So I've had to spend hours sitting in the Union and in coffee shops waiting for Empire Total War and DOW2 to download. Why this is necessary when I could just buy a disk is beyond me. I like owning a disk with some actual software on it, rather than a mere licence to download it at some point in the future.

Basically, I can see why Steam would be an option that appeals to some people (though not many around where I live at the moment). But that doesn't mean the rest of us PC gamers should be screwed because we haven't got easy access to a fast connection. There's no reason not to have both Steam copies and proper boxed copies available. People talk of the PC market suffering: well here's where developers are shooting themselves in the foot.
 

ffs-dontcare

New member
Aug 13, 2009
701
0
0
Petromir said:
ffs-dontcare said:
I like the games, but I hate Steam.

1 - I don't care about updating my games unless I play multiplayer or want to get rid of some pretty glaring bugs. Usually I just want to install my game and get to playing. When I installed Dawn of War 2, I was not happy to have to wait for it to update on my crappy internet connection. Nor was I happy about having to wait for games like Half-life 2 and Portal and such to finish updating when I just want to get into the single-player. I want to choose whether I update or not. Developers deserve to get paid for their work, but they (and the publishers) shouldn't get to control when I get to play and what version I play single-player with.
2 - I like to be absolutely certain that I can play my games anywhere at any time. I paid for my games, so I should be able to play them whenever I want, wherever I want.
3 - I want to be able to play my games in the future, ages from now. Even if I end up not doing so, it's great to have that option. I'm thankful to be able to play old classics like Z, C&C, Total Annihilation, Dark Reign and Duke Nukem 3D even today without having to deal with any DRM whatsoever. I want the same option with today's games. Again, I paid for it, so it's mine.

I realize that Steam has its uses if you're the sort of gamer who buys games via digital distribution, plays online regularly and perhaps just likes to update automatically on a fast-ass reliable connection, but it doesn't appeal to me personally.
1. Once its installed you can prevent a game frome ever updating again, with about 3 mouse clicks. Yes it can be annoying on installing especially for a SP game. Compared to some of the set up hoops from the days of C&C and Duke Nukem 3D, this is minor.

2. You can, as long as a games already installed offline mode doesnt care where you are. Its only installing them that casues any problems, and there are ways round even that.

3. You can, and will be able to just make sure that if steam goes bust you get the patches they have released (they already have made them, they just keep updating them as time goes by just in case).


Seriously you state some pretty old skool gaming there (much of which using an original copy causes far more heartache than steam does if you try on a modern PC). For example a few years ago i managed to get an original copy of C&C working on my PC, the only problem was the processor was so overpowered that the game ended before it had finished saying transfering battlefield control. It took me about as long to sort that problem out as it did to download empire total war, when that came out a year or so later.
In regards to number 3, you're probably right but I'm a cautious, wary person by nature. :p

As for number 2, Steam's off-line mode doesn't last forever, it requires you to log in online every few days or so. However, if what you say about turning off auto-updating is true, then that shouldn't really be an issue for me anymore. What does matter, however, is where I am. Even if Steam lets me play my games without updating them, there is still the issue of having to log in every few days or so and in a place with a bad connection or some dodgy filtering, that may prove to be a significant hurdle. But like I said, I'm wary by nature.

I've had issues with the auto-update (and disabling of) in the past. I suppose I can try it again at some point and see where that leads.
 

Petromir

New member
Apr 10, 2010
592
0
0
ffs-dontcare said:
In regards to number 3, you're probably right but I'm a cautious, wary person by nature. :p

As for number 2, Steam's off-line mode doesn't last forever, it requires you to log in online every few days or so. However, if what you say about turning off auto-updating is true, then that shouldn't really be an issue for me anymore. What does matter, however, is where I am. Even if Steam lets me play my games without updating them, there is still the issue of having to log in every few days or so and in a place with a bad connection or some dodgy filtering, that may prove to be a significant hurdle. But like I said, I'm wary by nature.

I've had issues with the auto-update (and disabling of) in the past. I suppose I can try it again at some point and see where that leads.
Does it not? Fairly sure used it to allow me to play some games occasionally on the in-laws PC and it never seemed to mind, and it didnt connect for at least 6 months....

Every so often Steam did used to have a habit of changing the update preferences, but that seems to have been sorted out.

Best way to manage the two is to log into online when you can mearly to keep steam happy, but check before you do, using offline mode your update settings are ok?

As far as I can tell steams online mode is very tollerant of shit internet as long as your not using the chat, store or using it to d/l.

Edit: Waryness is fair enough, and most of your concerns are fair, but should be fairly minimal risks these days.
 

strigoivii

New member
Aug 5, 2010
23
0
0
Personally I hate steam with a vengeance, call of duty waw took 2 days to install, even though I had a disc it kept trying to download through my steam account.... infinity ward and activision were overwhelmed by the amount of hate mail from users of steam who'd bought the game and I check every game in the shop to see whether the word steam appears on it. I have just bought several games from e-bay and unfortunately the one I most looked forward to, Saints row 2 (a game based on scarface) is completely unplayable... the driving lags or turns so fast it's impossible to see whats happening. I realise that some people don't want to buy 2nd hand games and like to download a game they've bought and it is supposed (ha ha) to stop piracy but the option should still exist for us that want to buy a game and play it in our own homes. I wonder if I'm entitled to my money back because I have purchased a product that is not fit for its intended use because of steam.... now THAT would be a great law case......
 

Anah'ya

a Taffer
Jun 19, 2010
870
0
0
It will be funny to wake up one day and find out that Steam and Skype banded together to form Steamy Skype Net and enslaved us all...

...

Okay, that was very unrelated.

But anyway.

No, this Taffer does not mind having to use Steam to play a game. I like Steam. Sometimes I dream about Steam. They are nice dreams.