Am I the only one finding it funny he said ''Xenorph'', with xeno meaning strange/alien in the name.TerribleAssassin said:I think it will be led by evil communist mutants from the planet Xenorph!
really i am? awwww
Am I the only one finding it funny he said ''Xenorph'', with xeno meaning strange/alien in the name.TerribleAssassin said:I think it will be led by evil communist mutants from the planet Xenorph!
Bring it! I'll rip their throats out with my bare hands!The Ambrosian said:Don't hope that happens!The Cheezy One said:Play Metro 2033. I really hope so!
I don't want to be attacked by a Dark One!
Even so, very under-rated. The shooting isn't too bad, the only bad thing is the occasional glitch, well too me anyway.The Cheezy One said:Bring it! I'll rip their throats out with my bare hands!The Ambrosian said:Don't hope that happens!The Cheezy One said:Play Metro 2033. I really hope so!
I don't want to be attacked by a Dark One!
Seriously though, a great story, just a shame the game fell a bit short in delivery. Like Logan Westbrook said, a more of a free roaming, exploratory factor would greatly improve the game, as the stations are really atmospheric, but zip by really fast.
And I will never have enough fun stabbing nosaliases through the throat!
This is the more optimistic route. Hopefully this will happen, but there are many things, like nukes that could go off, and if the opposite of what you said happens, well, just go watch Idiocracy.Ham_authority95 said:Besides more advanced technology and higher standards of living, it's impossible to tell.
Although I can safely say that we'll be safe from any over-population because of standards of living in both the Third World(which probably won't exist by that time) and the First World.
More education and prosperity=less babies being born.
Next to modern day console shooters, it is definitely an experience to be had. Especially as in-depth console games such as this and bioshock are few and far between.The Ambrosian said:Even so, very under-rated. The shooting isn't too bad, the only bad thing is the occasional glitch, well too me anyway.
Exactly. I mean... take a look at 1984... George Orwell predicted that would be what 1984 would look like. And he certainly wasn't the first to try and say that the future would be terrible.theevilsanta said:Much better than it is now, just like it always has been every 40 years in the future.
edit - Sadly, you're all very, very wrong. People have been predicting very real, very near future doom since the dawn of history. And lots of uneducated and quick-to-scare folks (like all of you) have been all too ready to believe it. Guess what. It never, ever happened. Things just kept getting better.
Didn't they call it "the world of tomorrow"?Scarim Coral said:I can tell you for one thing, even in the year 2050 there still won't be any flying cars or food in a pill etc. I really can't rememeber the official term of all of those future utopia vision by people from the past 1970's etc. That type of vision will still not happen in the year 2050.
How does the Assassin know when or where Adam and Eve are? And assuming you believe in creation theory, how would he then have been born X centuries later to go snipe aforementioned ancestors? You have created the ultimate grandfather parapdox! (Physicists theory about the Grandfather Paradox is that it would be impossible, because there would be nothing you could do in the past to prevent your birth. Nature will protect itself from being time-space-continuum fucked.Joshroom said:2050 not gonna happen I'm afraid. In 2043 an inventor named George Albarn is going to perfect the very first, fully working, paradox solving time machine. Then, it will be highjacked by a secret organisation who will send a Hitman style assassin through, back to the garden of Eden where he will snipe out Adam and Eve; effectively solving all of humanities problems.
Roll on 2043!
Reminds me of how under-rated singularity is. It's not the best but I really enjoyed it...The Cheezy One said:Next to modern day console shooters, it is definitely an experience to be had. Especially as in-depth console games such as this and bioshock are few and far between.The Ambrosian said:Even so, very under-rated. The shooting isn't too bad, the only bad thing is the occasional glitch, well too me anyway.
Just nuke the African continent, nobody likes those guys anyway. Hell, as long as North America, Europe, and Australia are still around I'd be happy.PoisonUnagi said:What we need is some very real, very sad genocide. Or infertility. If we can half or third the world's population over the course of a couple years, then we should be good. And use the Chinese child policy - no more than 2 children per family, with the obvious exception of triplets.
If that doesn't ensue, then, well, there go our resources.
the sad part is, your 1st prediction is probably true.pyrosaw said:World? What world? We would have eithr bombed each other to death, or the big corporations bought out the government. Okay maybe not the last option, but I want 2050 to be cyberpunk-ish.