How short is too short?

Recommended Videos

googleit6

New member
May 12, 2010
711
0
0
Lately, especially in the older generations among us, people have been complaining about how many of the young women and girls of various ages have started dressing in outfits that are shorter and lower than before. Almost every girl I know has a pair of short shorts, and there was even a girl at school yesterday who was wearing shorts that pretty much had her ass hanging right out of them. (A crude description, but accurate.)

Basically, I would like to know where you draw the line at acceptable, Escapists. Also, when does expressing oneself through clothing end, and offending the public begin? Where do you sit on this issue?
 

hittite

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,681
0
0
nudity.

I kid, I kid. To qualify as shorts, they have to cover more than the person's underwear does, otherwise it's just an exceptionally large belt.
 

supermariner

New member
Aug 27, 2010
808
0
0
the issue could be one of personal freedom
and why the general public's right not to be offended matters any more than the right to wear whatever you want
that's where i sit
but from MY standpoint (which again doesn't matter any more than the person who wears the short item) there shouldn't be any length too short really
 

That's Funny

New member
Jul 20, 2009
805
0
0
I don't have a line of acceptability per say, I just don't really care if people want to walk around half naked in the winter.
 

iBananaCrazy

New member
Sep 20, 2010
152
0
0
Well, honestly, people need to wear what looks best on them. I don't want a larger woman walking around with a dress that goes to the middle of her thighs. And short shorts are fine, as long as it covers your ass, we're fine.
 

Burwood123

New member
Dec 2, 2009
246
0
0
I would argue that skirts arent short enough.... If they wanna dress like sluts, then shout at us foor looking when they quite clearly know everybodies looking.... then let them
 

Slaanax

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,532
0
0
as long as your Genitals aren't hanging out it is fine with me, unless your a good looking girl. Then by all means girls let it hang out =D!
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
They couldn't really be any shorter than 5'1" if I was going to get off with them.
 

Prometherion

New member
Jan 7, 2009
533
0
0
Depends if they have the figure. I have no qualms with women in short shorts if it looks good. Big person = big shorts.

Now im the bad guy.
 

Jumping_Over_Fences

New member
Apr 15, 2009
978
0
0
I actually don't think shorts can be short enough. My reason may not be what you are expecting though. I find that woman who walk around dressed as whores are not the people I want to talk to, so it makes my job easier. If you are looking to attract that form of attention from men, you will not get my attention. There is a tasteful way to wear clothes and carry yourself.

Now I am starting to sound like an old man.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
If I can see their underwear, it's too short. That's for woman. For men, if I can see your underwear, pull your freaking pants up and get a belt or something.

In all honesty, I can see where adults and especially parents can get a tad shocked by this. I have a Latin Teacher who claims that if you put your hands by your side and your tallest finger is farther down then the cloth, then it's too short.
 

Dimitriov

The end is nigh.
May 24, 2010
1,215
0
0
That sounds waaay too short. It's about common courtesy, the general public has a right over one person because it affects far more people if the one person can't manage to just behave appropriately.

And it doesn't need to have anything to do with morals or religion or anything like that; the simple fact is that clothing like that is incredibly distracting, especially in a school setting.

I for one enjoy being able to actually think or concentrate on work/school once in a while :p
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,683
0
0
I don't get how bathing suits aren't considered obscene (not formal or particularly proper, for sure) even though they cover about as much or less than underpants.
 

Aqualung

New member
Mar 11, 2009
2,946
0
0
Woodsey said:
They couldn't really be any shorter than 5'1" if I was going to get off with them.
Someone obviously didn't read the OP.

OT: I'm frequently annoyed when girls wear shorts that literally stop at the crotch, or tops that stop above the navel. Call me old fashioned, but if you want to look like a whore, you're going to be treated like one.
 

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
Anything shorter than a burka is too short.

Prometherion said:
Depends if they have the figure. I have no qualms with women in short shorts if it looks good. Big person = big shorts.

Now im the bad guy.
Well, at least you're honest. No matter what anyone says, we're all with you on that.
 

tomtom94

aka "Who?"
May 11, 2009
3,373
0
0
Once it gets beyond 2/3 of the way up the thigh it's a bit on the silly side.

Though of course I'm not complaining.