The first film was at least original, which really was all that was going for it.
If you bring out a second one any originality is gone and it just becomes a mindless torture film. Which really isn't saying anything artistic or profound, so most of the kind of people who would watch it probably aren't legally allowed to watch it e.g. people under 18.
So really what would this film produce constructively?
Now yes I do believe that nothing should be censored (unless for comedic effect see, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVAJ30BE01E)
However it's hard to defend against something that just doesn't seem to do any good (it's like trying to defend Osama Bin Laden).
If you bring out a second one any originality is gone and it just becomes a mindless torture film. Which really isn't saying anything artistic or profound, so most of the kind of people who would watch it probably aren't legally allowed to watch it e.g. people under 18.
So really what would this film produce constructively?
Now yes I do believe that nothing should be censored (unless for comedic effect see, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVAJ30BE01E)
However it's hard to defend against something that just doesn't seem to do any good (it's like trying to defend Osama Bin Laden).