Human Centipede II Refused U.K. Classification

[PAGEToap44]

Damn it, I though Apple is finally announcing their Human CENTiPAD, I wanted to see the poor sods involved

I like the South Park reference.

I refuse to watch the first film. It seems a pointless a disgusting thing to be given it's own full length feature, now it has two.

 

[airrazor7]

One has to wonder, out of all of the writers trying to break into the screenplay business, how many good scripts are overlooked to make crap like this?

 

[faceless chick]

the first movie wasn't gory. what's wrong with people these days, are you this pussified?
the horror movies of the 80s piss a stream of blood and dead babies on this movie. jesus, SAW was more graphical than the human centipede.

if audiences these days are too scared by the first i can only assume the sequel is half as gory as one of the usual horror movies i watched as a teen. and if they continue with the retarded storyline of the first, i can declare it a normal horror movie for kids.

rate it pg-13 and show it, you losers!
maybe boys will grow a backbone again after watching a few of these.

 

[Sylocat]

*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*
*headdesks*

Yeah, that's my general feelings on this.

 

[Mikeyfell]

Someone made a movie about someone jerking off to another movie they made?

Sounds weird.

 

[arc101]

well....To Bittorrent *sixties batman music*

 

[T.D.]

The first film was at least original, which really was all that was going for it.

If you bring out a second one any originality is gone and it just becomes a mindless torture film. Which really isn't saying anything artistic or profound, so most of the kind of people who would watch it probably aren't legally allowed to watch it e.g. people under 18.

So really what would this film produce constructively?

Now yes I do believe that nothing should be censored (unless for comedic effect see, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVAJ30BE01E)

However it's hard to defend against something that just doesn't seem to do any good (it's like trying to defend Osama Bin Laden).

 

[Chris646]

Welp, internet rules state that this falls under rules 34 and 36.
But on topic: Why would they make this? Why?

 

[Angry Camel]

Oh good, this probably means it will get banned from Australia and we won't have to see this poor, digusting excuse of a horror film. If this does get through to Australia, my little tatter of faith left in our Classifications Board will be ripped apart.

 

[ExileNZ]

Wait... THEY WERE ABLE TO FUND AND PRODUCE A SECOND HUMAN CENTIPIDE!?!?!?

My.. my faith in the human race is completely gone now...

Amen to that.

 

[Android2137]

Never saw the first one. Never intend to see it. Glad Britain decided it was too offensive for screening. A line must be drawn somewhere.

 

[JasonKaotic]

Oh, come on. Really? Fuck you, censorship.

 

[JochemDude]

And through banning it they have just ensured that thousands of people who'd else never even heard about it are going to see it.

 

[1337mokro]

3 people sewn ass to mouth. It doesn't really disgust me. I've seen worse things that were created by man.

It was just an awful movie. Stupid decisions made by the characters, a hilarious supposed to be menacing villain and it really only had shock value which means that to me who just shrugged and eventually laughed at the "Feed her!" line it was just so bad it became a parody of the slasher/gore flick genre.

The sequel is only going to amp up the gore and paying 9 euro/12 for the 3D to watch a movie which has the same content and story as a cow being slaughtered, means that I could just go out and buy an entire cow and just watch while it get slaughtered at least I'll be able to throw a nice barbecue afterwards which I can't say about the movie.

On the subject of the ban however... I hope it gets banned here too. Would at least protect some people from wasting their money out of curiosity.

 

[Reishadowen]

Just....wow. My question is though, where would you even get a film-crew & actors to AGREE to do something like this in the first place though? I mean, yeah I knew the world is a pretty F*ed up place, but, SERIOUSLY?! Someone actually thought, "A movie where I play a character who's mouth is sewn to someone's anus is DEFINITELY the way I want to start my movie career!" and they thought this not once, but TWICE?

The more I learn about people, the more I wish I didn't have to.

 

[Ferrsai]

I'm not on the censorship bandwagon in general, however, stupidity should never be rewarded in any way. This movie is both base and banal. It offers absolutely no value to the industry or society. Sadly, it's not the only form of stupidity being rewarded today. I won't argue with anybody who would defend trash like this. Yes, it's just an opinion, but our opinions make us who we are. If one finds that this is worth defending, I'm sorry you poor soul, you are beyond hope.

Oh society, what have you become...