I don't trust Valve anymore.

Recommended Videos
Jun 11, 2008
5,329
0
0
SL33TBL1ND said:
Glademaster said:
SL33TBL1ND said:
Wait, so you don't like optional microtransactions, hats that actually do things and an optional trading system to get the stuff you've been missing for ages? Of course there's going to be a few hiccups at first. Remember the wrongful COD6 bans? It all got fixed in the end, give them time.
The only point I don't agree with what you're trying to make is that hates should affect gameplay. They aesthetic nonesense which is part of what TF2 is about but they should not affect gameplay in way they do in polycount pack.
It's not like they're providing an unbalanced bonus. But I can see why you wouldn't want them to. To each their own.
Well no they're not that bad I mean the bonus could be worse and non set reliant.
 
Dec 14, 2008
1,038
0
0
iLikeHippos said:
FINALLY a valid reason to hate a developer. I'm so damn fed up with all the "Blizz banned peeps for cheating so I will hate them >:C"
the stupidity it mother***** hurts...

OT: This will be a downfall of revered and veteran players by the seems of it. If I ever get steam, I'll just stay the fuck away from Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress where the most obvious grievers will be. I can't afford to be consulted 10 days to clear out the bans of "HE FUCKING SHOT ME!!!12" reports each time it happens. Which it will. A lot. Because they're dumbasses, those grievers.

Thanks for the heads up. No, really... It's good to know when the GMs goes ape-shit for the stupidity of others.
What are you on about? The topic is discussing the ban of some person scamming someone out of an item in TF2 and the harsh punishment that followed, not Valve believing rage induced reports from random douchebags.
 

Cazza

New member
Jul 13, 2010
1,931
0
0
They should only delete your items not your steam account thats to far. I shall watch who I trade with. Last thing I want is some troller to accuse me and get me locked out for who knows how long.
 

Veleste

New member
Mar 27, 2010
241
0
0
Working in the games industry I can tell you that people do not get their accounts banned for no reason. Investigations are launched into flagged accounts if the account meets the criteria it is banned - if the player requests it another investigation is launched, if it supports the first ban then your account is closed forever with no hope but often the ban gets seen as being harsh and that you've learned your lesson and it gets overturned. Companies like Valve and even smaller ones like Riot who support online gaming have an obligation to protect their player base from cheaters and the most effective way of doing this is by banning those who cheat or exploit weaknesses in the system.

I don't know exactly their policies on it but I imagine they give a warning first and then a ban - anything else is bad business practice.
 

iLikeHippos

New member
Jan 19, 2010
1,837
0
0
philosophicalbastard said:
iLikeHippos said:
FINALLY a valid reason to hate a developer. I'm so damn fed up with all the "Blizz banned peeps for cheating so I will hate them >:C"
the stupidity it mother***** hurts...

OT: This will be a downfall of revered and veteran players by the seems of it. If I ever get steam, I'll just stay the fuck away from Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress where the most obvious grievers will be. I can't afford to be consulted 10 days to clear out the bans of "HE FUCKING SHOT ME!!!12" reports each time it happens. Which it will. A lot. Because they're dumbasses, those grievers.

Thanks for the heads up. No, really... It's good to know when the GMs goes ape-shit for the stupidity of others.
What are you on about? The topic is discussing the ban of some person scamming someone out of an item in TF2 and the harsh punishment that followed, not Valve believing rage induced reports from random douchebags.
I said my outright opinion over the topic, and what I think will happen. Even the OP has one.

Why not contribute and share?
 

Jekken6

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,285
0
0
I just hate that people on TF2 now, alot of people, are just trying to trade with others and that's about it. Maybe because the last few servers i've been on have been 2fort servers.
 
Dec 14, 2008
1,038
0
0
iLikeHippos said:
philosophicalbastard said:
iLikeHippos said:
FINALLY a valid reason to hate a developer. I'm so damn fed up with all the "Blizz banned peeps for cheating so I will hate them >:C"
the stupidity it mother***** hurts...

OT: This will be a downfall of revered and veteran players by the seems of it. If I ever get steam, I'll just stay the fuck away from Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress where the most obvious grievers will be. I can't afford to be consulted 10 days to clear out the bans of "HE FUCKING SHOT ME!!!12" reports each time it happens. Which it will. A lot. Because they're dumbasses, those grievers.

Thanks for the heads up. No, really... It's good to know when the GMs goes ape-shit for the stupidity of others.
What are you on about? The topic is discussing the ban of some person scamming someone out of an item in TF2 and the harsh punishment that followed, not Valve believing rage induced reports from random douchebags.
I said my outright opinion over the topic, and what I think will happen. Even the OP has one.

Why not contribute and share?
I was just making sure that you didn't read it wrong and raged for no reason.

I still believe valve is one of the greatest developers out there, and any mistakes they make will surely be corrected given their record.
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
Yeah...Even my favourite video game company isn't beyond at least a little bullshit it seems.

Do what I do. Don't trust anyone. It works wonders.

*sticks on tin foil hat*
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,660
0
0
starfox444 said:
I agree with you about the prices being ridiculous, but I'm going to have to agree with giving the account a ban. Otherwise, saying that the "Hat isn't worth that guy's Steam account" makes it sound like if you buy enough games on Steam, you are above rules of decent conduct.
Nope, but it SURE as hell means that, even if I was a terrible BASTARD in every online game I have on steam that I suddenly lose the right to play all those other games at all.

I mean, I own three games on steam that I never realized relied on Steamworks to begin with. Most recently New Vegas. If I grief and cheat in TF2, fine I get banned. Water under the bridge. Expected result. But if I grief and cheat in TF2 I suddenly don't get to play my Single Player Game where I can only grief and cheat against some silly math problems?
 

Veritasiness

New member
Feb 19, 2010
88
0
0
Yeah, banning an entire Steam account over TF2 item scamming seems like a pretty bad decision, buisnesswise and playerwise.

On the other hand, it is an excellent deterrent - if it's commonly expected that Valve will remove your access to ALL of your games for scamming in one of them, well, who'd take that risk?
 

JUMBO PALACE

Elite Member
Legacy
Jun 17, 2009
3,552
7
43
Country
USA
Seems a bit extreme to me. At least he got his account back which means Valve looked into the problem.
 

oreopizza47

New member
May 2, 2010
578
0
0
jackpipsam said:
Valve lost me when they stoped updating Half-Life 2 deathmatch
Noting that this is a relatively old post, how exactly would one update Half-Life Deathmatch? Not a whole lot to change in a game specifically designed for deathmatch rounds, or at least it would seem that way.
 
Jun 23, 2008
613
0
0
I have my own annoyances with Steam, but mostly they seem to do right. I still think licenses for games should be transferable from one account to the next, but they've made a strong point to steer away from the ultra-dick-moves, like charging a subscription fee, requiring a continuous connection for single-player activity, or limiting installations.

I suspect that the current incident(s) with the Mann-conomy are part of its growing pains. We saw similar problems with Steam in general with the release of Half-Life 2. These days, with maybe the exception off Stardock's Impulse, it's the most ethically responsible of the online distribution clients available.

Don't expect any better from Activison or EA, to be sure.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
The two things that erk me are that you're given free crates that are just screaming at you to spend money to open them, and that the polycount pack needs hats to get the extra bonus.

And the bonuses aren't always balanced mind you. Scout's get an extra 25 hp. No downside.

Snipers are immune to headshots. No downside.

Soldiers get 20% damage resistance from sentries. No downside.

Pyro's get a speed boost, almost on a scout's level now. I was running away from one today in a hallway and THE PYRO CAUGHT UP WITH A SCOUT RUNNING AWAY. Then an airblast or two and you're screwed. They become slightly more vulnerable to bullet damage but that speed boost far outweighs that.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,607
0
0
Well basing your entire trust on a few accounts if unfair. To be honest, I am not worried at all.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
Payne121 said:
He got his account back, obviously they did an investigation. No need to get all worked up over it.
So basically there's no problem?

[sub]It's too late for real reading.[/sub]
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,628
0
0
This is why you shouldn't put all your games(eggs) in one service(basket). Its also why I am pissed at more and more games exclusively using Steam.

What happened to that guy sucks, and banning someone over accusations is crap. However perhaps they banned his account temporarily to investigate. If he was suspected of scamming, Valve probably banned him to avoid more people getting scammed.
 

Digitaldreamer7

New member
Sep 30, 2008
588
0
0
The reason I don't trust valve anymore... is because of the whole "we are taking over DOTA" DOTA is blizzards realm and it is a community project that is open source and free. I hope blizzard takes this away from them and leaves it in the hands of the players and the community where it belongs. If they charge for it, ill no longer buy valve games. (i know, an empty threat that they wouldnt care about, but I don't care)