Wait are you saying that the fixed camera is only present in MGS2? because thats what turned me off of the series is that not there in all the other games?IanBrazen said:Besides the fixed camera I have no problems with the game play
Wait are you saying that the fixed camera is only present in MGS2? because thats what turned me off of the series is that not there in all the other games?IanBrazen said:Besides the fixed camera I have no problems with the game play
I haven't played the MGS series, but given the fact that his original post complained about the game's story being delivered poorly saying that he failed to understand it doesn't have an bearing on his criticism. In literature and most multimedia the rule is SHOW don't TELL. This means that you should SHOW character traits or relationships through their actions rather than delivering it via exposition because the result will always be more powerful.Conrad Wentzel said:Honestly if you didn't like Metal Gear Solid 2 because you thought the story was bad, it was probably because you didn't understand it. It was sort of like how I hated Fight Club the first time I saw it because I was too young and stupid to understand the deep concepts explained in the movie.
Read this plot analysis guide and then tell me if you think the story still sucks:
http://junkerhq.net/MGS2/
I thought you were an MGS fan.IanBrazen said:jeese I cannot imagine even more of that heavy handed drivel.
Or nuance, subtlety, character, or video games. It's like he wanted to make a movie but couldn't edit it down to 90 minutes.trty00 said:"Show, don't tell?" HA! That's rich. Hideo Kojima couldn't grasp that concept if you smashed into his mind with a stone!
Yes I was looking for that, and I do like that interpretation. Though I don't know how many people will buy it.DioWallachia said:It was a bad game on purpose. Kojima didn't want to make more MGS games after 2 but the death threats and the pressure made him do it.Lovely Mixture said:MGS2 was my introduction to the series, and I liked it. However I agree that the original concept was much better, the game we got lacks some oomph to it.
And goddamn I am so happy, so happy to see that people are critical of MGS4. That game was awful on all accounts that I don't see how people can all MGS4 a good game and still call MGS2 bad.
http://metagearsolid.org/reports_mgs4.html
No I completely understood all of the story. I think its a FANTASTIC story I just think its not told very well.Conrad Wentzel said:Honestly if you didn't like Metal Gear Solid 2 because you thought the story was bad, it was probably because you didn't understand it. It was sort of like how I hated Fight Club the first time I saw it because I was too young and stupid to understand the deep concepts explained in the movie.
I truly believe either Kojomi has gone insane sort of how George Lucas went insane with Star Wars or that he truly did not want to make a fourth game and was forced to by Konami. It would explain why the game basically undid everything the other games setup. I also like how everything in the fourth game was answered with nanomachines. Sometimes if you can't come up with a good explanation, it is best not to explain it at all.
You know what, now that you mention it, the game is probably a lot worse than I let myself believe lol.Matthew94 said:The bosses are boring an unimaginative, they are probably the worst out of the 4 games.
The game essentially ends after act 2. Acts 1 and 2 were the only acts with decent gameplay, the rest is just a way to push the plot forward.
Gaping plot holes, where did raidens second arm go?
Every bloody cutscene starts with "the nanomachines..."
The codec is WOEFULLY underused and as a result all that plot trivia gets put into more cutscenes rather than bring optional.
Drebin's shop unbalances the whole game. You may say "don't use it" but it doesn't matter, 95% of gamers are still going to use it.
Big Boss coming back, really?
I could go on.
They all had fixed cameras, but mgs2 was the worst one imo. I dont mind fixed cameras as long as they are done well.lemby117 said:Wait are you saying that the fixed camera is only present in MGS2? because thats what turned me off of the series is that not there in all the other games?IanBrazen said:Besides the fixed camera I have no problems with the game play
The irony of it is that From The New World was intended to be a break from the previous games to attract new players. It didn't work, and most of it's faults just annoyed the fans of the previous games (all 12 of us). I'm still not sure what exactly whoever came-up with Mao's ability quests was thinking (other than they needed something even less practical than Hilda's shape-shifting). The story is particularly grating considering that the only real emotional depth we see in it are from the villains, while the player is stuck following the story of Blond Young Male Protagonist#73 and Miss Fanservice.Arqus_Zed said:As for the third and final installments in the Shadow Hearts series... I've already voiced my complaints numerous times before: lousy characters, lame story, only five fusions (really, five? compared to the 20 of SH or the 23 of SH:C?) and no evolution what so ever in terms of graphics and gameplay. Hell, they even took a couple of steps back: the stellar chart system isn't nearly as interesting as the Key of Solomon mechanic, the CG cut-scenes aren't as impressive and most environments don't leave much of an impression. Not to mention that the franchise used to mix genuinely deep, heavy and even horrific moments with some truly funny moments. This one was just a silly slapstick fest. The only solace is that Yoshitaka Hirota still provided a kick-ass soundtrack. Still, worst way to end a trilogy. Ever.
Half of the appeal of the Metal Gear series is it's audacity.The Wonder of the net said:I still think that Metal Gear one two and three are good. Solid sci-fi but its the new one coming out. Rising Revengence. That sounds utterly retarded. If you are going to do "Revengence" at least put out Metal Gear Rising because at this point the plot holes with Raiden will not become clearer if you try to work at it. Just cut your losses and if you want to make a Sci-fi hack and slash make a new game franchise. Other wise still kinda looking forward to Metal Gear Rising.
But didn't they just leave Solidus Snake's body there? I mean it would be like taking the watch off a dead guy. He won't use it now.PieBrotherTB said:Half of the appeal of the Metal Gear series is it's audacity.The Wonder of the net said:I still think that Metal Gear one two and three are good. Solid sci-fi but its the new one coming out. Rising Revengence. That sounds utterly retarded. If you are going to do "Revengence" at least put out Metal Gear Rising because at this point the plot holes with Raiden will not become clearer if you try to work at it. Just cut your losses and if you want to make a Sci-fi hack and slash make a new game franchise. Other wise still kinda looking forward to Metal Gear Rising.
Put it this way, John Cygan has been apparently signed up as a voice actor.
John Cygan as in the voice of Solidus Snake.
Solidus Snake, who died in MGS2, and
who's body was destroyed and burned in place of Big Boss'
That's so ridiculous that it's awesome.