NotAPie said:
Yeah, Been there done that.
I've thought about changing my personality to being more of a jerk...I just can't, but fuck it I'm in no hurry to find anyone at the moment.
Wouldn't help. Being successful romantically is sometimes correlated with being a jerk, but the causal relationship is reversed. Guys who don't have to work hard to get girls (hot guys) don't tend to work as hard at relationships, and slip into being "jerks". They're jerks because they get girls easily, they don't get girls easily because they're jerks.
mrpenguinismyhomeboy said:
Nah man, see, I think theres probably instances of both occurring in the real world. I think that your misinterpreting it. It is possible to see someone only as a friend, despite how attractive they are, and, it is possible to fall in love with someone, despite how attractive they aren't. See, I think your being close minded.
I disagree on both counts. If I am friends with a girl (or a girl is friends with me) the only difference between that and being in a relationship is mutual sexual attraction. Different people are attracted to different things, sure, and one woman's "hideous CHUD" is another woman's diamond in the rough, but then we're getting off topic.
If what you mean is that some girls don't find the usual definition of "hotness" appealing, and some guys don't find the usual definition of "beautiful" appealing, I agree. But, there's no way that it makes sense for a girl to reject a guy (who she likes as a friend, and finds sexually appealing), nor for her to date a guy who she finds sexually unappealing.
The definition of appealing is subjective, not categorical.
mrpenguinismyhomeboy said:
Consider this scenario: We have a guy. And he's what a person would consider a physically attractive guy. Now, he also has a sister. They are close to the same age. And this sister is also what a person would consider a physically attractive girl. This brother and sister pair are close. they are brother and sister, and sense the grew up at relatively the same pace, they are close, and have emotional bonds to each other. Both the brother and the sister would consider each other to be physically attractive if they thought about it.
Now see, your logic says that if the brother asks the sister out on a date, then she has no good reason for refusing to date her brother. After all, her brother isn't a dick, and is a physically attractive person. So, by your logic she has no reason to not date him. In fact, according to what you said, the sister should accept and start actively dating her brother, because theres no real reason for her to not do it. After all, her brother is attractive, and she'd enjoy the sex right?
Wrong. See, she wouldn't start dating her brother, despite the fact that he's not a douche and is good looking. Her brother is exactly that, her brother, and she has never thought about him in a romantic way before, and to do so would be incredibly uncomfortable for her. She will not start actively dating her brother.
I'm not sure that brother is a good analogy, though. We're hard-wired to be unable to find our siblings physically attractive. So, from her perspective, he isn't a viable sexual candidate, and my point remains the same. She doesn't find him attractive, because (while another person might), she is culturally, and even arguably genetically, disposed to find the idea repulsive.
It goes back to my point (which I should have made clear): the question of whether he's "attractive" is dependent on her definition of attractive. Some girls are chubby chasers, they might find me attractive, and reject my good friend who's much more gaunt. If a girl is into the thin indie-rocker look, she'll go for my friend. But, if I ask out a girl and get some variation on the "friend zone" then it's really just "she doesn't find me sexually appealing"
mrpenguinismyhomeboy said:
This is the other use of the term friend zone. It does exist, because it is possible for you to present yourself to a girl in such a way that you don't appear interested in her, and as a result, she doesn't have any romantic interest in you either, and as a result, when it's been a year of you two being close friends and you suddenly decide to ask her out, she will not date you, because she can't think of you in that way. It has less to do with you being ugly, and more about with how you present yourself.
That's simply untrue. It assumes that girls are very simpleminded creatures, who (after enough time spent thinking about someone one way) cannot change their minds forward or back. But that's not how we know either ourselves to be (my feelings about friends change), nor how any other human would be. And, again, you're falling into the trap of putting the entire locus of control of this into male hands, which is sheer crap.
I dare you to find a girl who would verify that claim "well, I liked him at first, but he seemed so aloof that I lost interest, then when he told me he liked me I'd simply stopped liking him", and where there aren't fifteen different confounding variables.
mrpenguinismyhomeboy said:
It's not about friendly or being an asshole, it's about showing interest. She wont date you if you don't show interest. You have to let her know you are a viable option.
But then again, I'm awful with women, so I have no idea how to show women you are "interested" in them without writing them a cheesy poem. But I'm sure the principle still stands. The friend zone does exist. Both uses of the term work.
I've been in a fair number of relationships, and excluding two (neither of which went very well), I have never showed direct interest in having a relationship. Mostly since I've always been happy being friends. And these girls have approached me (which is also how I know this experience fro the other wise), expressed their interest in me.
What to make of this? Well, I'd say that there's nothing wrong with asking a girl out, but accept that there's nothing you could have done to change her answer. I've asked out girls who were my friends, and been rejected, I've asked out girls who weren't my friends and been rejected. In no cases have I seen actual instances where the act of being a friend (and nothing more) precludes a girl from wanting to be my girlfriend if she finds me attractive.
That's the god's honest truth.