Well the normies aren't going to want to be like Beast or what not and dealing with the negative effects. They'll just want to be like Superman, so really it wouldn't be equal.Mr.Mattress said:I just read three pages of this Forum, and I cannot believe no one has said this. Now, I would be Pro-Mutant if they where real, but if they where real, Why would we try to "demutify" them? Why wouldn't we try to get on their level? Think about it, there are mutants that can shoot laser beams, manipulate minds, turn into beasts, teleport, bend steal, transform into anyone on the planet! I mean, my goodness, think of what we could learn by studying them! We could make all of Humanity on their level! Human Progress isn't accomplished by "Dumbing" down others, it's made by studying and adapting. Science, Politics, Art, Philosophy, all done through study and adapting. To Demutify people would be to censor television, would be to burn heretics at the stake, would be to ban a book due to it's controversial message. We don't need to Demutify the Mutants, we need to Mutify ourselves to be equal to them. That is the only solution. And the only way to accomplish that is to accept Mutants into society.
Even worse, when they first have powers they initially can't control them.Witty Name Here said:Nothing about fear or conquest. Hell, I said in my own post that it'd either be no one is a mutant or every person is; I'd have no problem so long as either of those things are met.GamerMage said:And you actually believe that? You wouldn't even give them a chance to prove you otherwise? I suppose what they say is true: "You fear what you don't understand, and hate what you can't conquer."
But in the end, humans and mutants would be incapable of co-existing for the most part. Think about it for a moment, there have been studies showing that merely having a gun in the house increases a person's chance of responding violently/aggressively... now what if that person could cause someone to explode just with their thoughts alone?
It has nothing to do with "hatred" or anything. I wouldn't "hate" someone for being a mutant, however I'd acknowledge the fact they technically -could- kill me without breaking a sweat. I mean, for God's sake, imagine some 13-year old in the throes of hormonal rebellion suddenly having access to nuclear weapons, or a toddler that can breath fire having a temper tantrum.
It's a tragedy just waiting to happen.
Did they kill senators and a president without notice?GamerMage said:(Uh, yes? Yes, it could? Ever hear of Waco before?)
You missed the point. What i meant is that there are already people considered enemies and if a crooked higher up wanted it they could also order special units to kill people based on bogus accusation. If you can say a senator is a mutant while he's not why not a terrorist?(Look up Infamous: Second Son. They call the Conduits "Bio-Terrorists". Fetch (A Neon Conduit)'s parents try to turn her in to the cops. )
Elaborate. What Am I missing here? Mutant a extremely powerful and can cause a lot of damage, mutants are human and thus prone to evil/regretful actions so mutants could cause a whole lot of deaths. What is it i'm missing?(No, dear, that's what we would call "Missing the forest for the trees". )
Since i'm not a soldier, a man? Although i'd say calling all soldiers slaves is quite rude.(1. No, generals3... a man chooses, a slave obeys. Which are you, I wonder? 2. Like you?)
When i have to be, i'll be cold blooded.Oh the american centrismI'm not even from the US and it would be on a global scale if it were up to me. (You're cold-blooded, you that?)
When your decisions can affect billions of lives, yes.And i'm sorry to say it but that paragraph was an emotionally loaded ideological speech involving little to no pragmatism. (Does everything have to be?)
Well it's not that amazing really.Killing people can very well help actually. If I can save a million by killing one or save a billion by killing thousands than i'm going to say killing helps. I'm sorry but i'm not going to risk the lives of millions by letting living time bombs with huge powers walking around. Either i'll defuse them or destroy them. (That what you tell yourself,generals3? Amazing how you can justify such actions, isn't it?)
Yes... isn't that what i just said?(That's EXACTLY what you'd be doing!)
Yes it is[No,it isn't!)
If you think protecting millions/billions from extremely dangerous beings is a "poorly defined", fine i guess.I gave my poorly defined reasons.
A monster? No. I'm just the one who'd do what has to be done so people like you, who don't want to make the hard decisions, get to keep their conscience and live. In this world sometimes evil has to be done for the greater good.You're a monster, you know that? I'm half surprised you wouldn't try to find a way to weaponize them for yourself. We're not going to reacha happier ending if we don't at least TRY to reach it first. You're saying you'd just kill them with wreckless abandon. What is WRONG with you?
And are you suggesting that literally every mutant is going to have world-ending powers like that? Or are you suggesting that we ought to treat someone who has a magical, invisible sixth finger on their left hand that can only affect brownies the same as Mad Jim Jaspers [http://marvel.wikia.com/James_Jaspers_%28Earth-616%29]? Do you realize how stupid that sounds? How backwards that sounds? How paranoid that sounds? You're approaching Glenn Beck levels of paranoia there, pal. Step back a bit. Take a deep breath.Spot1990 said:It's not even about violent mutants. You ever heard of New Son? It's an alternate universe version of Gambit. Who lost control of his powers and killed literally everyone on Earth in seconds. He travelled to different realities and found the same thing had happened in a bunch of them. This is Gambit we're talking about. The guy with the stick and the cards. Letting mutants walk around free would be like letting people buy over the counter nukes at a 7/11.
I considered writing a longer response, but really, this is the only thing I think I need to respond to. Because you're absolutely right. I don't have a problem with keeping tabs on people; I don't even have a problem with keeping a registry of people who have certain powers. What I have a problem with is the idea that there is NO WAY that people with inherent, inborn differences can live together peacefully. And what I especially have a problem with is the idea that someone would be willing to murder children, and their parents, for that reason. People who don't have the power to do harm to you otherwise. It boggles my mindgenerals3 said:If you don't see any problems with people who could be considered as powerful or more than nuclear weapons running around than we clearly will never agree on this. Personally i'm already very strongly pro gun control because i consider giving your average joe a hand gun already irresponsible. So yeah, mutant super powers... That's societal suicide.
I've heard of it, but I haven't played it. I played the first one; I really liked it...right up until the third act. I actually threw my controller so hard I broke it at that one point. You know the one.GamerMage said:(Insert Slow Clap Here) Couldn't have put it better myself. It's people like this we gotta watch for. They make people like us look bad. Ever play Infamous: Second Son? It's main plot focused on this. Heck, it's part of the main villain Augustine's reason for Curdain Cay and the DUP as a whole. ...If I had some amazing powers like Gambit or Delsin's or even Natsu's for Fairy Tail, I'd want to help others. I'd be hesitant at first, (Not sure where I'd start) but ultimately, I'd do it. That's just the kind of person I am.
Pretty much this. I don't read the comics, but in the various incarnations of the X-men I have seen it always amazes me that the words "Human Rights" never come up while mutants are being herded into concentration camps and what-not.chinangel said:pro mutie. The last thing this world needs is even more descrimination and hate: god knows we have enough as is.
Who ever said that? I'm sorry but you're distorting my argument. You've taken one specific type of difference and than extent to "all differences", as if i ever said anything about "differences" in general. We're talking about people with special abilities that make them much more powerful than your average human being (and by extent more dangerous). A person with a mental deficiency is also inherently different but did anything imply i'd want to "neutralize" them? No. That's because they aren't a danger to society.000Ronald said:What I have a problem with is the idea that there is NO WAY that people with inherent, inborn differences can live together peacefully.