Um ... yeah. Might have missed the boat on that one.Ninjamedic said:-Transform Fox News into a propaganda station.
Well that explains the Bahamas and Australia but why did you have to take Ireland? From a geographical perspective it's basically just more of the same!Zykon TheLich said:...I'm sorry, what was that?
You do realise that the entire reason we went round taking other peoples countries is that ours is so horrible right?
The Mongols.klaynexas3 said:I would conquer Russia. Because once I have it, no one else can take it from me. Name one person that has managed to take Russia, besides Russians?
Hey I'm open to a peaceful merger. But you just seem so stubborn on maintaining your "rights" that war is the only option I'm afraid.Caiphus said:How cruel. Australia attacking New Zealand would be like beating up your little brother.Drummodino said:As an Australian, New Zealand. They really should stop pretending to be their own country and just join up with us already. We can trade, Kiwi birds for kangaroos!
Your slightly uppity, insecure little brother.
The Normans started it, I guess they didn't realise the mistake they were making, but you can't leave a job half done.C14N said:Well that explains the Bahamas and Australia but why did you have to take Ireland? From a geographical perspective it's basically just more of the same!
Ah I see, pumping us for our vast natural resources of...ummm...all of that...err...wind and rain that we have, valuable stuff that.Imp Emissary said:Also, I just said it was a nice place. I didn't say we all wanted to live there. ;p
Read my later post. I have to keep the Right-Wingers in line somehow.DragonStorm247 said:Um ... yeah. Might have missed the boat on that one.Ninjamedic said:-Transform Fox News into a propaganda station.
Good idea, though it only sometimes counts a continent. Other times, it's part of Oceania, along with NZ, part of Indonesia and various smaller nations.balladbird said:I'd conquer Australia. The way I see it, even though it's just one country, it also counts as a continent, so I'd get +2 reinforcements a turn for having it, which would give me a slight advantage over those who chose a country that isn't a continent. Then I could just mass my troops in indonesia every turn and voila! perfect defensive bottleneck.
See the underlined section.Silverbeard said:The Mongols.klaynexas3 said:I would conquer Russia. Because once I have it, no one else can take it from me. Name ONE PERSON that has managed to take Russia, besides Russians?
Zykon TheLich said:The Normans started it, I guess they didn't realise the mistake they were making, but you can't leave a job half done.C14N said:Well that explains the Bahamas and Australia but why did you have to take Ireland? From a geographical perspective it's basically just more of the same!
Ah I see, pumping us for our vast natural resources of...ummm...all of that...err...wind and rain that we have, valuable stuff that.Imp Emissary said:Also, I just said it was a nice place. I didn't say we all wanted to live there. ;p
Ah-ha.bartholen said:See the underlined section.Silverbeard said:The Mongols.klaynexas3 said:I would conquer Russia. Because once I have it, no one else can take it from me. Name ONE PERSON that has managed to take Russia, besides Russians?
Nope, he died way before they got into Europe, and Russia didn't exist as a country back then, it was a cluster of principalities that didn't even reach the lower stretches of Volga. and they didn't manage to take the whole area that would later become Russia [Edit, although considering the bit they left was basically Siberia that may well have been through choice].Silverbeard said:Ah-ha.
I missed that part amidst the general chaos of the statement. One person who managed to take Russia besides Russians (as opposed to 'one person that has managed to take Russia, besides a Russian) created a grammatical paradox that warped my sense of reality.
Yes, I did invoke the Hammer of Grammar on you. Are you reeling from the impact yet?
And Genghis Khan.
Clearly you have not read The BFG.Imp Emissary said:To some people, it is.
*puts out a rain catcher*
But mostly we would just make it less expensive/difficult for us to visit.
And don't sell yourselves short. You have something very valuable as a natural resource.
Your wonderful people.
xD Your wonderfully, tasty people.....
[sub][sub]Nah. We won't eat you. All people taste terrible ;p[/sub][/sub]
Touche, old boy. Touche.Zykon TheLich said:Nope, he died way before they got into Europe, and Russia didn't exist as a country back then, it was a cluster of principalities that didn't even reach the lower stretches of Volga. and they didn't manage to take the whole area that would later become Russia [Edit, although considering the bit they left was basically Siberia that may well have been through choice].Silverbeard said:Ah-ha.
I missed that part amidst the general chaos of the statement. One person who managed to take Russia besides Russians (as opposed to 'one person that has managed to take Russia, besides a Russian) created a grammatical paradox that warped my sense of reality.
Yes, I did invoke the Hammer of Grammar on you. Are you reeling from the impact yet?
And Genghis Khan.